Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-75dct Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-10T23:59:15.489Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Morphology of the functionally univentricular heart

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 September 2005

Robert H. Anderson  and
Andrew C. Cook
Robert H. Anderson
Affiliation:
Cardiac Unit, Institute of Child Health, University College, London, UK
Andrew C. Cook
Affiliation:
Cardiac Unit, Institute of Child Health, University College, London, UK
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Of all the complex malformations that affect the heart, those that have produced the greatest difficulty, over the years, in terms of logical description and classification are the ones with the circulations supported by a functionally univentricular mass. The problems in description stem from the fact that, although the ventricular mass functions as a singular entity, the majority of lesions falling within this category, from the stance of morphology, possess two ventricular chambers. For many years, and indeed, even now in many centres, the hearts are described as being “univentricular”, or alternatively as “single ventricles”. There is still no consensus as to which particular lesions should be included within this “univentricular” category. The paradigm of the group is usually taken as double inlet left ventricle.1 In this lesion, the dominant left ventricle is accompanied by a rudimentary second chamber, albeit that arguments continue as to whether the second chamber is an incomplete right ventricle,2 or simply an infundibulum.3 Further arguments raged as to whether tricuspid atresia should be included within the univentricular category.4,5 The debate is rationalised when we recognise that all the potentially univentricular hearts are treated nowadays by constructing the Fontan circulation,6 or one of its variants,7 as indeed are some unequivocally biventricular hearts.8 Clarification and simplification of the anatomical arrangement in this functionally univentricular category, as we will show in this review, is provided by rigorous application of the crucial philosophic principle of analysis called the “Morphological Method”,9 coupled with separate analysis of the ventricular mass and the atrioventricular junctions.10,11

Type
Anatomical Considerations
Information
Cardiology in the Young , Volume 14 , Issue S1 , February 2004 , pp. 3 - 12
Copyright
© 2004 Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Edwards JE. Discussion. In: Davila JC (ed.). 2nd Henry Ford Hospital International Symposium on Cardiac Surgery. New York, Appleton-Century-Crofts, 1977, p 242.
Anderson RH, Becker AE, Tynan M, Macartney FJ, Rigby ML, Wilkinson JL. The univentricular atrioventricular connection: getting to the root of a thorny problem. Am J Cardiol 1984; 54: 822–828.Google Scholar
Van Praagh R. Nomenclature and classification: Morphologic and segmental approach to diagnosis. In: Moller JH, Hoffman JIE (eds). Pediatric Cardiovascular Medicine. New York, Churchill Livingstone, 2000, pp 275–288.
Anderson RH, Becker AE, Macartney FJ, Shinebourne EA, Wilkinson JL, Tynan MJ. Is “tricuspid atresia” a univentricular heart? Pediatr Cardiol 1979; 1: 51–56.Google Scholar
Bharati S, Lev M. The concept of tricuspid atresia complex as distinct from that of the single ventricle complex. Pediatr Cardiol 1979; 1: 57–62.Google Scholar
Fontan F, Baudet E. Surgical repair of tricuspid atresia. Thorax 1971; 26: 240–248.Google Scholar
de Leval MR, Kilner P, Gewillig M, Bull C. Total cavopulmonary connection: a logical alternative to atriopulmonary connection for complex Fontan operations. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1988; 96: 682–695.Google Scholar
Barlow A, Pawade A, Wilkinson JL, Anderson RH. Cardiac anatomy in patients undergoing the Fontan procedure. Ann Thorac Surg 1995; 60: 1324–1330.Google Scholar
Van Praagh R, David I, Wright GB, Van Praagh S. Large RV plus small LV is not single RV. Circulation 1980; 61: 1057–1058.Google Scholar
Anderson RH, Ho SY. Continuing medical education. Sequential segmental analysis – description and categorization for the millenium. Cardiol Young 1997; 7: 98–116.Google Scholar
Anderson RH, Baker EJ, Redington AN. Can we describe structure as well as function when accounting for the arrangement of the ventricular mass. Cardiol Young 2000, 10: 247–260.Google Scholar
Keeton BR, Macartney FJ, Hunter S, Mortera C, Rees P, Shinebourne EA, Tynan M, Wilkinson JL, Anderson RH. Univentricular heart of right ventricular type with double or common inlet. Circulation 1979; 59: 403–411.Google Scholar
Brandt PWT. Cineangiography of atrioventricular and ventriculo-arterial connexions. In: Godman MJ (ed.). Paediatric Cardiology Volume 4. Edinburgh, Churchill Livingstone, 1981, pp 199–220.
Bjork VO, Olin CL, Bjarke BB, Thoren LA. Right atrial-right ventricular anastomosis for correction of tricuspid atresia. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1979; 77: 452–458.Google Scholar
Kurosawa H, Imai Y, Fukuchi S, Sawatari K, Koh Y, Nakazawa M, Takao A. Septation and Fontan repair of univentricular atrioventricular connection. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1990; 99: 314–319.Google Scholar
Hosseinpour AR, Anderson RH, Ho SY. The anatomy of the septal perforating arteries in normal and congenitally malformed hearts. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2001; 121: 1046–1052.Google Scholar
Anderson RH, Anderson C, Zuberbuhler JR. Further morphologic studies on hearts with pulmonary atresia and intact ventricular septum. Cardiol Young 1991; 1: 105–114.Google Scholar
Dyamenali U, Hanna B, Sharratt GP. Pulmonary atresia with intact ventricular septum: management of the coronary arterial anomalies. Cardiol Young 1997; 7: 105–113.Google Scholar