Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-x5gtn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-10T11:32:53.978Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Noonan syndrome and pregnancy outcomes

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  17 January 2022

Christopher A. Chow*
Affiliation:
Department of Pediatrics, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA
Katherine H. Campbell
Affiliation:
Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA
Josephine C. Chou
Affiliation:
Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA
Robert W. Elder
Affiliation:
Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA
*
Author for correspondence: C. Chow, MD, Yale School of Medicine, 15 York St., LLCI 0302, New Haven, CT 06510, USA. Tel: (925) 628-3504; Fax: 6502637390. E-mail: cachow6@gmail.com

Abstract

Background:

Noonan syndrome is a genetic disorder with high prevalence of congenital heart defects, such as pulmonary stenosis, atrial septal defect and hypertrophic cardiomyopathy. Scarce data exists regarding the safety of pregnancy in patients with Noonan syndrome, particularly in the context of maternal cardiac disease.

Study design:

We performed a retrospective chart review of patients at Yale-New Haven Hospital from 2012 to 2020 with diagnoses of Noonan syndrome and pregnancy. We analysed medical records for pregnancy details and cardiac health, including echocardiograms to quantify maternal cardiac dysfunction through measurements of pulmonary valve peak gradient, structural heart defects and interventricular septal thickness.

Results:

We identified five women with Noonan syndrome (10 pregnancies). Three of five patients had pulmonary valve stenosis at the time of pregnancy, two of which had undergone cardiac procedures. 50% of pregnancies (5/10) resulted in pre-term birth. 80% (8/10) of all deliveries were converted to caesarean section after a trial of labour. One pregnancy resulted in intra-uterine fetal demise while nine pregnancies resulted in the birth of a living infant. 60% (6/10) of livebirths required care in the neonatal intensive care unit. One infant passed away at 5 weeks of age.

Conclusions:

The majority of mothers had pre-existing, though mild, heart disease. We found high rates of prematurity, conversion to caesarean section, and elevated level of care. No maternal complications resulted in long-term morbidity. Our study suggests that women with Noonan syndrome and low-risk cardiac lesions can become pregnant and deliver a healthy infant with counselling and risk evaluation.

Type
Original Article
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2022. Published by Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Roberts, AE, Allanson, JE, Tartaglia, M, Gelb, BD. Noonan syndrome. Lancet 2013; 381: 333342.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Romano, AA, Allanson, JE, Dahlgren, J, et al. Noonan syndrome: clinical features, diagnosis, and management guidelines. Pediatrics 2010; 126: 746759.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Turner, AM. Noonan syndrome. J Paediatr Child Health 2014; 50: E14E20.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Liao, J, Mehta, L. Molecular genetics of Noonan syndrome and RASopathies. Pediatr Endocrinol Rev 2019; 16: 435446.Google ScholarPubMed
El Bouchikhi, I, Belhassan, K, Moufid, FZ, et al. Noonan syndrome-causing genes: molecular update and an assessment of the mutation rate. Int J Pediatr Adolesc Med 2016; 3: 133142.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tidyman, WE, Rauen, KA. The RASopathies: developmental syndromes of Ras/MAPK pathway dysregulation. Curr Opin Genet Dev 2009; 19: 230236.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Karnik, R, Geiger, M. Cardiac manifestations of Noonan syndrome. Pediatr Endocrinol Rev 2019; 16: 471476.Google ScholarPubMed
Pierpont, ME, Digilio, MC. Cardiovascular disease in Noonan syndrome. Curr Opin Pediatr 2018; 30: 601608.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Prendiville, TW, Gauvreau, K, Tworog-Dube, E, et al. Cardiovascular disease in Noonan syndrome. Arch Dis Child 2014; 99: 629634.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kouz, K, Lissewski, C, Spranger, S, et al. Genotype and phenotype in patients with Noonan syndrome and a RIT1 mutation. Genet Med 2016; 18: 12261234.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chase, CJ, Holak, EJ, Pagel, PS. Anesthetic implications of emergent cesarean section in a parturient with Noonan syndrome and bacterial endocarditis. J Clin Anesth 2013; 25: 403406.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cullimore, AJ, Smedstad, KG, Brennan, BG. Pregnancy in women with Noonan syndrome: report of two cases. Obstet Gynecol 1999; 93: 813816.Google ScholarPubMed
Engemise, S, Croucher, C. Pregnancy following oocyte donation in a woman with Noonan’s syndrome and a balanced Robertsonian translocation a case report. Arch Gynecol Obstet 2007; 276: 185187.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grange, CS, Heid, R, Lucas, SB, Ross, PL, Douglas, MJ. Anaesthesia in a parturient with Noonan’s syndrome. Can J Anaesth 1998; 45: 332336.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Joo, JG, Beke, A, Toth-Pal, E, Csaba, A, Papp, C. Successful pregnancy in a Noonan syndrome patient after 3 unsuccessful pregnancies from severe fetal hydrops: a case report. J Reprod Med 2005; 50: 373376.Google Scholar
Magboul, MM. Anaesthetic management of emergency caesarean section in a patient with Noonan’s syndrome--case report and literature review. Middle East J Anaesthesiol 2000; 15: 611617.Google Scholar
McBain, J, Lemire, EG, Campbell, DC. Epidural labour analgesia in a parturient with Noonan syndrome: a case report. Can J Anaesth 2006; 53: 274278.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McLure, HA, Yentis, SM. General anaesthesia for caesarean section in a parturient with Noonan’s syndrome. Br J Anaesth 1996; 77: 665668.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Adam, K. Pregnancy in women with cardiovascular diseases. Methodist Debakey Cardiovasc J 2017; 13: 209215.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nanna, M, Stergiopoulos, K. Pregnancy complicated by valvular heart disease: an update. J Am Heart Assoc 2014; 3: e000712.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sanghavi, M, Rutherford, JD. Cardiovascular physiology of pregnancy. Circulation 2014; 130: 10031008.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Suwanrath, C, Thongphanang, P, Pinjaroen, S, Suwanugsorn, S. Validation of modified World Health Organization classification for pregnant women with heart disease in a tertiary care center in southern Thailand. Int J Womens Health 2018; 10: 4753.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Silversides, CK, Grewal, J, Mason, J, et al. Pregnancy outcomes in women with heart disease: the CARPREG II study. J Am Coll Cardiol 2018; 71: 24192430.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cuypers, JA, Witsenburg, M, van der Linde, D, Roos-Hesselink, JW. Pulmonary stenosis: update on diagnosis and therapeutic options. Heart 2013; 99: 339347.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hensley, N, Dietrich, J, Nyhan, D, Mitter, N, Yee, MS, Brady, M. Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy: a review. Anesth Analg 2015; 120: 554569.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Menon, R, Richardson, LS. Preterm prelabor rupture of the membranes: a disease of the fetal membranes. Semin Perinatol 2017; 41: 409419.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wiig, H, Keskin, D, Kalluri, R. Interaction between the extracellular matrix and lymphatics: consequences for lymphangiogenesis and lymphatic function. Matrix Biol 2010; 29: 645656.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed