Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-ndmmz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-10T21:07:52.888Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Persistent electrical and morphological atrial abnormalities after early closure of atrial septal defect

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 January 2005

Clifford L. Cua ,
Elizabeth E. Sparks ,
David P. Chan  and
Curt J. Daniels
Clifford L. Cua
Affiliation:
Department of Pediatrics, Division of Pediatric Cardiology, Columbus Children’s Hospital, Columbus, OH, USA
Elizabeth E. Sparks
Affiliation:
Department of Pediatrics, Division of Pediatric Cardiology, Columbus Children’s Hospital, Columbus, OH, USA
David P. Chan
Affiliation:
Department of Pediatrics, Division of Pediatric Cardiology, Columbus Children’s Hospital, Columbus, OH, USA
Curt J. Daniels
Affiliation:
Department of Pediatrics, Division of Pediatric Cardiology, Columbus Children’s Hospital, Columbus, OH, USA
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Atrial arrhythmias are associated with enlarged atrial chambers and an increased duration of the P wave. Repair of atrial defects within the oval fossa is expected to normalize atrial size. Few studies, however, have evaluated electrical and morphological atrial features after repair. Our study was performed to determine if atrial abnormalities exist after surgical closure of such atrial septal defects, and whether early closure improves outcome. We recruited patients who had undergone surgical closure of a defect within the oval fossa, so-called “secundum” atrial septal defects. Electrocardiograms, signal averaged electrocardiograms, and echocardiograms were performed. Two-tailed test and Pearson correlation was utilized for statistical analysis. The population consisted of 20 patients and 27 controls, with the mean age of the patient being 11.25 ± 5.10 years, their age at surgery 6.55 ± 5.10 years, and the time since surgery 4.70 ± 2.61 years. The size of the right (23.88 ± 6.35 ml/m2 versus 18.84 ± 4.43 ml/m2) and left (21.91 ± 12.47 ml/m2 versus 17.72 ± 4.83 ml/m2) atrium were significantly larger in the patients. The duration of the P wave (108 ± 16 ms versus 96 ± 8 ms) and the duration of the PR interval (155 ± 18 ms versus 138 ± 23 ms) were longer. No correlation existed between age or interval since surgery with atrial sizes or measurements of the signal averaged electrocardiogram. We conclude that, despite surgical repair, abnormalities exist in patients with an atrial septal defect. Early surgery does not appear to prevent the atrial abnormalities.

Type
Original Article
Information
Cardiology in the Young , Volume 14 , Issue 5 , October 2004 , pp. 481 - 487
Copyright
© 2004 Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Campbell M, Neill C, Suzman S. The prognosis of atrial septal defect. BMJ 1957; 1: 1375–1383.Google Scholar
Konstantinides S, Geibel A, Olschewski M, et al. A comparison of surgical and medical therapy for atrial septal defect in adults. N Engl J Med 1995; 333: 469–473.Google Scholar
Gatzoulis MA, Redington AN, Somerville J, Shore DF. Should atrial septal defects in adults be closed? Ann Thorac Surg 1996; 61: 657–659.Google Scholar
Meijboom F, Hess J, Szatmari A, et al. Long-term follow-up (9 to 20 years) after surgical closure of atrial septal defect at a young age. Am J Cardiol 1993; 72: 1431–1434.Google Scholar
Esscher E, Michaelsson M. Long-term results following closure of isolated ostium secundum atrial septal defect in children and adults. Europ J Cardiol 1977; 6: 109–116.Google Scholar
O’Laughlin MP. Catheter closure of secundum atrial septal defects. Tex Heart Inst J 1997; 24: 287–292.Google Scholar
Kort HW, Balzer DT, Johnson MC. Resolution of right heart enlargement after closure of secundum atrial septal defect with transcatheter technique. J Am Coll Cardiol 2001; 38: 1528–1532.Google Scholar
Berger F, Vogel M, Kramer A, et al. Incidence of atrial flutter/fibrillation in adults with atrial septal defect before and after surgery. Ann Thorac Surg 1999; 68: 75–78.Google Scholar
Ruschhaupt DG, Khoury L, Thilenius OG, Repogle RL, Arcilla RA. Electrophysiologic abnormalities of children with ostium secundum atrial septal defect. Am J Cardiol 1984; 53: 1643–1647.Google Scholar
Bagger JP, Thomsen PE, Bjerregaard P, Gotzsche H, Rasmussen K. Intracardiac electrography in patients before and after surgical repair of secundum atrial septal defect. J Electrocardiology 1984; 17: 347–352.Google Scholar
Brandenburg Jr RO, Holmes DR, Brandenburg RO, McGoon DC. Clinical follow-up study of paroxysmal supraventricular tachyarrhythmias after operative repair of a secundum Type atrial septal defect in adults. Am J Cardiol 1983; 51: 273–276.Google Scholar
Gatzoulis MA, Freeman MA, Siu SC, Webb GD, Harris L. Atrial arrhythmia after surgical closure of atrial septal defects in adults. N Engl J Med 1999; 340: 839–846.Google Scholar
Bricker JT, Gillette PC, Cooley DA, McNamara DG. Dysrhythmias after repair of atrial septal defect. Tex Heart Inst J 1986; 13: 203–208.Google Scholar
Bink-Boelkens M, Velvis H, Homan van der Heide JJ, Eygelaar A, Hardjowijono RA. Dysrhythmias after atrial surgery in children. Am Heart J 1983; 106: 125–130.Google Scholar
Satoh T, Zipes DP. Unequal atrial stretch in dogs increase dispersion of refractoriness conducive to developing atrial fibrillation. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol 1996; 9: 833–842.Google Scholar
Moe GK. On the multiple wavelet hypothesis of atrial fibrillation. Arch Int Pharmacodyn Ther 1962; 140: 183–188.Google Scholar
Alessie MA, Lammers WJEP, Bonke FIM, Hollen J. Experimental evaluation of Moe's multiple wavelet hypothesis of atrial fibrillation. In: Zipes DP, Jalife J (eds). Cardiac Arrhythmias. Grune and Stratton, Orlando, FL, 1985, pp 265–276.
Aronow WS, Ahn C, Kronzon I. Echocardiographic findings associated with atrial fibrillation in 1699 patients aged >60 years. Am J Cardiol 1995; 76: 1191.Google Scholar
Tsang TSM, Barnes ME, Bailey KR, et al. Left atrial volume: important risk marker of incident atrial fibrillation in 1655 older men and women. Mayo Clin Proc 2001; 76: 467–475.Google Scholar
Steinberg JS, Zelenkofske S, Wong SC, Gelernt M, Sciacca R, Menchavez E. Value of the P-wave signal-averaged ECG for predicting atrial fibrillation after cardiac surgery. Circulation 1993; 88: 2619–2622.Google Scholar
Tuzcu V, Ozkan B, Sullivan N, Karpawich P, Epstein ML. P wave signal-averaged electrocardiogram as a new marker for atrial tachyarrhythmia in postoperative Fontan patients. J Am Coll Cardiol 2000; 36: 602–607.Google Scholar
Ishimoto N, Ito M, Kinoshita M. Signal-averaged P-wave abnormalities and atrial size in patients with and without idiopathic paroxysmal atrial fibrillation. Am Heart J 2000; 139: 684–689.Google Scholar
Fukunami M, Yamada T, Ohmori M, et al. Detection of patients at risk for paroxysmal atrial fibrillation during sinus rhythm by P wave-triggered signal-averaged electrocardiogram. Circulation 1991; 83: 162–169.Google Scholar
Dhala A, Underwood D, Leman R, et al. Signal-averaged P-wave analysis of normal controls and patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation: a study in gender differences, age dependence, and reproducibility. Clin Cardiol 2002; 25: 525–531.Google Scholar
Darber D, Jahangir A, Hammill SC, Gersh BJ. P-wave signal-averaged electrocardiography to identify risk for atrial fibrillation. PACE 2002; 25: 1447–1453.Google Scholar
Triposkiadis F, Wooley CF, Boudoulas H. Mitral stenosis: left atrial dynamics reflect altered passive and active emptying. Am Heart J 1990; 120: 124–132.Google Scholar
Bolens M, Friedli B. Sinus node function and conduction system before and after surgery for secundum atrial septal defect: an electrophysiologic study. Am J Cardiol 1984; 53: 1415–1420.Google Scholar
Lester SJ, Ryan EW, Schiller NB, Foster E. Best method in clinical practice and in research studies to determine left atrial size. Am J Cardiol 1999; 84: 829–832.Google Scholar