Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-5wvtr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-24T04:22:30.724Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Monuments, Kitsch, and the Sense of Nation in Imperial Germany

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 January 2017

Helmut Walser Smith
Helmut Walser Smith*
Affiliation:
Vanderbilt University
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This article shows how the material culture of nationhood can reveal a different perspective on the problem of nationalism. Using simple time graphs and Geographic Information Systems (GIS), the article considers temporal and spatial dimensions of “nation objects” in an effort to understand the allusive phenomenon of banal, everyday national identity. Specifically, it brings together quantitative evidence for the pervasiveness of veterans monuments, Kaiser Wilhelm I and Otto von Bismarck monuments, as well as monuments to Germany's great intellectuals, and then examines the world of objects, largely kitsch, that these monuments brought forth. The article argues that, especially in small-town Germany, objects signifying the nation point to a national sentiment governed less by the sharp logic of ideology than by the harmonizing tendencies of kitsch.

Dieser Aufsatz zeigt, wie die materielle Kultur der nationalen Einheit eine andere Perspektive auf das Problem des Nationalismus bieten kann. Durch die Verwendung einfacher Zeitgraphiken und Geographic Information Systems (GIS) werden die zeitlichen und räumlichen Dimensionen von “Nationalobjekten” betrachtet, um das anspielungsreiche Phänomen banaler, alltäglicher Nationalidentität zu begreifen. Konkret werden quantitative Nachweise weit verbreiteter Kriegsdenkmäler, Denkmäler für Kaiser Wilhelm I. und Otto von Bismarck sowie Denkmäler für Deutschlands führende Intellektuelle zusammengeführt und im Anschluss daran die Welt der Objekte – größtenteils Kitsch –, die diese Denkmäler hervorgebracht haben, untersucht. Dabei wird argumentiert, dass diese die Nation repräsentierenden Objekte vor allem im kleinstädtischen Deutschland auf ein Nationalgefühl verweisen, das weniger durch klar definierte Ideologie als vielmehr durch die harmonisierenden Tendenzen von Kitsch bestimmt ist.

Type
Articles
Information
Central European History , Volume 49 , Issue 3-4 , December 2016 , pp. 322 - 340
Copyright
Copyright © Central European History Society of the American Historical Association 2016 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 The relevant literature is cited in Judson, Pieter M., “Nationalism in the Era of the Nation-State, 1870–1945,” in The Oxford Handbook of Modern German History, ed. Smith, Helmut Walser (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2011), 499–526 Google Scholar.

2 On the religious dimension, especially for the early decades of Imperial Germany, see Bennette, Rebecca Ayako, Fighting for the Soul of Germany: The Catholic Struggle for Inclusion after Unification (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar; on the Social Democrats and dominant strains of nationalism, see Lidtke, Vernon L., The Alternative Culture: Socialist Labor in Imperial Germany (New York: Oxford University Press, 1985)Google Scholar; on antisemitism, the best comprehensive work is Zumbini, Massimo Ferrari, Die Wurzeln des Bösen: Gründerjahre des Antisemitismus: Von der Bismarckzeit zu Hitler (Frankfurt/Main: Vittorio Klostermann, 2003)Google Scholar; on minorities and assimilation, see Rahden, Till van, Jews and Other Germans: Civil Society, Religious Diversity, and Urban Politics in Breslau, 1860–1925 (Madison: University of Wisconsin Press, 2008)Google Scholar.

3 Schieder, Theodore, Das Kaiserreich als Nationalstaat, 2nd ed. (Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht, 1992), 75 Google Scholar; Mosse, George, Nationalization of the Masses: Political Symbolism and Mass Movements in Germany, from the Napoleonic Wars through the Third Reich (New York: Howard Fertig, 1975), 93 Google Scholar; Hobsbawm, Eric, “Mass-Producing Traditions: Europe, 1870–1914,” in The Invention of Tradition, ed. Hobsbawm and Ranger, Terence (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1983), 264 Google Scholar.

4 In 1890, the residential distribution according to size of community was as follows: 53 percent in communities under 2,000; 12 percent in communities of 2,000 to 5,000; 13.1 percent in communities of 5,000 to 20,000; 9.8 percent in communities of 20,000 to 100,000; and 12.1 percent in cities over 100,000. See Hohorst, Gerd, Kocka, Jürgen, and Ritter, Gerhard A., eds., Sozialgeschichtliches Arbeitsbuch, vol. 3: Material zur Statistik des Kaiserreichs, 1870–1914, 2nd ed. (Munich: C.H. Beck, 1978), 52 Google Scholar.

5 Most prominently, Eley, Geoff, Reshaping the German Right: Radical Nationalism and Political Change after Bismarck, 2nd ed. (Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 1991)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

6 The nobility in Germany comprised less than 0.5 percent of the population, whereas the combined numbers of the economic bourgeoisie (Wirtschaftsbürgertum) and the educated bourgeoisie (Bildungsbürgertum) made up, on a generous reckoning, some 6 percent. See Helmut Walser Smith, “Authoritarian State, Dynamic Society, Failed Imperialist Power, 1878–1914,” in Smith, The Oxford Handbook of Modern German History, 315–16. For further details, see Wehler, Hans-Ulrich, Deutsche Gesellschaftsgeschichte, 1849–1914 (Munich: C.H. Beck, 1995), 712–13Google Scholar.

7 One way to think of this deepening is through the concept of “banal nationalism.”  See Billig, Michael, Banal Nationalism (London: Sage, 1995), 6, 8–9Google Scholar, where he refers to a kind of nationalism that is “flagged” in everyday lives—a kind of “routine and familiar form” of nationalism that might be distinguished from more passionately held, articulate forms. Whether this should still be called nationalism as opposed to a form of national consciousness is a separate issue.

8 It is difficult to select the outstanding exemplars in this tradition, even when the sample is limited to Imperial Germany, the subject of nationalism, and English-language publications. Within this group, the older works include Blackbourn, David, Class, Religion, and Local Politics in Wilhelmine Germany (New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 1980)Google Scholar; Koshar, Rudy, Social Life, Local Politics, and Nazism: Marburg, 1880–1935 (Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press, 1986)Google Scholar; Applegate, Celia, A Nation of Provincials: The German Idea of Heimat (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1990)CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Confino, Alon, The Nation as a Local Metaphor: Württemberg, Imperial Germany, and National Memory, 1871–1918 (Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press, 1997)Google Scholar. Of the newer works, see esp. Zimmer, Oliver, Remaking the Rhythms of Life: German Communities in the Age of the Nation-State (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

9 For an entry into this scholarship, see Auslander, Leora, “Beyond Words,” American Historical Review 110, no. 4 (October, 2005): 1015–45CrossRefGoogle Scholar. For a pathbreaking work in the context of nineteenth-century German history, see Giloi, Eva, Monarchy, Myth, and Material Culture in Germany, 1750–1950 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2011)Google Scholar. On some differences between close or thick readings, and the search for patterns, see Moretti, Franco, Distant Reading (New York: Verso, 2013)Google Scholar. There is, of course, a venerable tradition of searching for cultural patterns in serial data; see, e.g., Vovelle, Michel, Piété baroque et déchristianisation en Provence au XVIIIe siècle: Les attitudes devant la mort d'après les clauses de testaments (Paris: Seuil, 1973)Google Scholar.

10 Still instructive is Friedländer, Saul, Reflections on Nazism: An Essay on Kitsch and Death, trans. Weyr, Thomas (New York: Harper & Row, 1984)Google Scholar.

11 Quoted in Ailings, Reinhard, Monument und Nation: Das Bild vom Nationalstaat im Medium Denkmal—zum Verhältnis von Nation und Staat im deutschen Kaiserreich 1871–1918 (Berlin: Walter de Gruyter, 1996), 76 CrossRefGoogle Scholar, citing Berlin und die Berliner, ed. anon (Karlsruhe: J. Bielefelds Verlag, 1905), 183 Google Scholar.

12 Mittig, Hans-Ernst and Plagemann, Volker, eds., Denkmäler im 19. Jahrhundert: Deutung und Kritik (Munich: Prestel Verlag, 1972), 284 Google Scholar; Mutter, Richard, “Die Denkmalseuche,” in Aufsätze über bildenende Kunst, vol. 2, ed. Rosenhagen, Hans (Berlin: J. Ladyschinkow, 1914), 59–68 Google Scholar.

13 Abshoff, Fritz, Deutschlands Ruhm und Stolz: Unsere hervorragendsten vaterländischen Denkmäler in Wort und Bild (Berlin: Verlagsanstalt Universum, 1904)Google Scholar.

14 Kuntzemüller, Otto, Die Denkmäler Kaiser Wilhelm des Großen in Abbildungen mit erläuterndem Text (Bremen: Heinr. Engelke, 1902)Google Scholar. For Bismarck monuments, see Kloss, Günter and Seele, Sieglinde, Bismarck-Türme und Bismarck-Säulen: Eine Bestandsaufnahme (Petersberg, 1997)Google Scholar, from which the data in this article are drawn. See also Seele, Sieglinde, Lexikon der Bismarck-Denkmäler (Petersberg: Michael Imhof, 2005)Google Scholar.

15 For early attempts at gathering Germany's poets, philosophers, scientists, musicians, and artists, see Abshoff, Fritz, Deutschlands Geistes-Helden: Ehrendenkmäler unserer hervorragenden Führer auf geistigem Gebiet in Wort und Bild (Berlin: Verlagsanstalt Universum, 1901)Google Scholar; Weddigen, Otto, Die Ruhestätten und Denkmäler unserer deutschen Dichter (Halle: Hermann Gesenius, 1904)Google Scholar; Selbmann, Rolf, Dichter Denkmäler in Deutschland (Stuttgart: Metzler Verlag, 1988)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

16 Koselleck, Reinhart, Zur politischen Ikonologie des gewaltsamen Todes (Basel: Schwabe und Co. A.G., 1998)Google Scholar.

17 See Laqueur, Thomas, The Work of the Dead: A Cultural History of Mortal Remains (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

18 Musil, Robert, “Denkmale,” in Gesammelte Werke, vol. 7, Kleine Prosa, Aphorismen, Autobiographisches, ed. Frisé, Adolf (Reinbek: Rowohlt, 1978), 506 Google Scholar; also see Dichtung und Wahrheit über 1813, Sozialdemokratische Flugschriften 19 (Berlin: Vorwärts, 1913), cited in Sauer, Klaus and Werth, German, Lorbeer und Palme: Patriotismus in deutschen Festspielen (Munich: Deutscher Taschenbuch-Verlag, 1971), 138 Google Scholar.

19 Rohrkrämer, Thomas, Der Militarismus der kleinen Leute: Die Kriegervereine im Deutschen Kaiserreich (Munich: R. Oldenbourg Verlag, 1990)CrossRefGoogle Scholar. On folkloric militarism, see Vogel, Jacob, “Military, Folklore, Eigensinn: Folkloric Militarism in Germany and France, 1871–1914,” Central European History 33, no. 4 (2000): 487–504 CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

20 Bjork, James E., Neither German nor Pole: Catholicism and National Indifference in a Central European Borderland (Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 2008), 95 CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

21 Robert Musil, cited in Ailings, Monument und Nation, 593; second quote from Dichtung und Wahrheit über 1813, cited in Sauer and Werth, Lorbeer und Palme, 138.

22 Heiligenstein, Ron, Regimental Beer Steins of the Imperial German and Royal Bavarian Armies and the Imperial German Navy, 1890 to 1914 (Milwaukee, WI: R.R. Heiligenstein, 1997)Google Scholar.

23 Ibid., 49–52.

24 See esp. Eva Giloi, Monarchy, Myth, and Material Culture, 157–85.

25 Ibid., 274; Otto May, Deutsch sein heißt treu sein: Ansichtskarten als Spiegel von Mentalität und Untertanenerziehung in der Wilhelminischen Ära (1888–1918) (Hildesheim: Lax Verlag, 1998), 60.

26 May, Deutsch sein heißt treu sein, 71.

27 Mrs. Sidgwick, Alfred, Home Life in Germany (London: Meuthen and Co., 1908), 97 Google Scholar.

28 Hobsbawm, “Mass-Producing Traditions”; Nipperdey, Thomas, “National Idee und Nationaldenkmal in Deutschland im 19. Jahrhundert,” in Nipperdey, Gesellschaft, Kultur, Theorie (Göttingen: Vandenhoeck and Ruprecht, 1976), 133–73CrossRefGoogle Scholar. See also Hull, Isabel V., “Prussian Dynastic Ritual and the End of Monarchy,” in German Nationalism and the European Response, 1890–1945, ed. Fink, Carole, Hull, Isabel V., and Knox, MacGregor (Norman: University of Oklahoma Press, 1985), 13–42 Google Scholar.

29 Eley, Reshaping the German Right.

30 Prussia counted some 60 percent of all monuments (a figure roughly commensurate with the percentage of the Prussian population in the German Empire).

31 Gerwarth, Robert, The Bismarck Myth: Weimar Germany and the Legacy of the Iron Chancellor (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2005), 18–24 CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

32 Breitenborn, Konrad, Bismarck: Kult und Kitsch um den Reichsgründer (Leipzig: Kep Verlag, 1990), 7 Google Scholar.

33 May, Deutsch sein heißt treu sein, 149.

34 Ibid.

35 Selbmann, Dichter Denkmäler in Deutschland, 25–26.

36 Noltenius, Rainer, Dichterfeiern in Deutschland: Rezeptionsgeschichte als Sozialgeschichte am Beispiel der Schiller- und Freiligrath-Feiern (Munich: Wilhelm Fink Verlag, 1984)Google Scholar.

37 On these celebrations, see esp. Lehmann, Hartmut, “Das Lutherjubiläum 1883,” in Protestantische Weltsichten (Göttingen: Vandenhoeck and Ruprecht, 1998), 105–29Google Scholar.

38 See, e.g., the postcards from the collection of Karl Stehle and commentary by Georg Jäger on the LMU (Ludwig Maximilian University of Munich) web page dedicated to the era of Goethe: http://www.goethezeitportal.de/wissen/illustrationen/johann-wolfgang-von-goethe/heidenroeslein/goethe-motive-auf-postkarten-heidenroeslein-kunst-kitsch-karikatur.html.

39 Kühn, Paul, Die Frauen um Goethe: Weimarer Interieurs, 2 vols. (Leipzig, 1911–12)Google Scholar.

40 Ibid.

41 Lacher, Reimer, “Die Denkmalsstatue der Anna Louisa Karsch von J. C. Stubenitzky aus dem Landschaftspark Spiegelsberge bei Halberstadt,” in Frauen im 18. Jahrhundert: Entdeckungen zu Lebensbildern in Museen und Archiven in Sachsen-Anhalt, ed. Weiss, Thomas, Dziekan, Katrin, and Pfeifer, Ingo (Halle: Mitteldeutscher Verlag, 2009), 71–83 Google Scholar.

42 The only other monuments to major Jewish intellectual figures were the monument to Moses Mendelssohn in Dessau, erected in 1890 by the city council, not the Jewish community; a monument to the beloved Black Forest storywriter Berthold Auerbach; and a monument to the baptized composer Felix Mendelssohn. See Roemer, Nils, Jewish Scholarship and Culture in Nineteenth-Century Germany (Madison: University of Wisconsin Press, 2005), 129 Google Scholar.

43 Zimmermann, Maria, “Denkmäler für Henrich Heine in Deutschland: Ein Spiegel seiner Rezeptionsgeschichte,” Mitteldeutsches Jahrbuch für Kultur und Geschichte 3 (1996): 181 Google Scholar.

44 A member of the city council, quoted in Schubert, Dietrich, “Der Kampf um das erste Heine-Denkmal: Düsseldorf 1887–1893, Mainz 1893–1894, New York 1899,” Wallraf-Richartz-Jahrbuch: Westdeutsches Jahrbuch für Kunstgeschichte 51 (1990): 251 Google Scholar.

45 “Heine Monument Unveiled,” New York Times, July 9, 1899.

46 Zimmermann, “Denkmäler für Heinrich Heine.”

47 Heilbronner, Oded, Catholicism, Political Culture, and the Countryside: A Social History of the Nazi Party in South Germany (Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

48 Anonymous handbill, “Einweihung des Wieland Denkmals in Biberach 1881.”

49 These positions were first articulated, respectively, in Deist, Wilhelm, Flottenpolitik und Flottenpropaganda: Das Nachrichtenbureau des Reichsmarineamtes 1897–1914 (Stuttgart: Deutsche Verlags-Anstalt, 1974)Google Scholar, and in Eley, Reshaping the German Right.

50 Cited in Groh, Dieter, Negativer Integration und revolutionärer Attentismus: Die deutschen Sozialdemokratie am Vorabend des Ersten Weltkrieges (Frankfurt/Main: Ullstein Verlag, 1973), 436 Google Scholar.

51 Rohrkrämer, Der Militarismus der kleinen Leute, 275.

52 Smith, Helmut Walser, German Nationalism and Religious Conflict: Culture, Ideology, Politics, 1870–1914 (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1995), 115–40CrossRefGoogle Scholar.