No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
East German History and the Crisis of Liberal Democracy
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 14 October 2022
Extract
On September 25, 2017, Germany awoke to the horrifying reality that the Alternative for Germany (AfD), a far-right party founded in 2013, had romped to third place in the previous day's federal election. With 12.6% of the vote, the party became not only the official face of the opposition to Angela Merkel's not-so-grand coalition with the Social Democratic Party (SPD), but also the first far-right party to enter the Bundestag since the 1950s. Election watchers soon noticed that the AfD had racked up stunning margins in the states that once made up the German Democratic Republic (GDR), coming in first on the second ballot (Zweitstimme) in Saxony and second in Brandenburg, Mecklenburg-Vorpommern, Saxony-Anhalt, and Thuringia. That the AfD, a racist and xenophobic party that campaigns against European integration and immigration, should do so well in once-socialist states bespoke East Germany's strange resonances in German culture and memory nearly thirty years after its dissolution.
- Type
- Review Essay
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © The Author(s), 2022. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of Central European History Society of the American Historical Association
References
1 Yoder, Jennifer A., “‘Revenge of the East’?: The AfD's Appeal in Eastern Germany and Mainstream Parties’ Responses,” German Politics and Society 38, no. 2 (June 2020): 36–37Google Scholar; L. Constantin Wurthmann et al., “Many Losers – One Winner? An Examination of Vote Switching to the AfD in the 2017 German Federal Election Using VAA Data,” Party Politics, April 16, 2020, 3.
2 In the 2021 federal elections, the AfD lost about two percent in the national vote (from 12.6% to 10.3%), making it only the fifth-strongest party in parliament and no longer the official face of the opposition. Nonetheless, the party placed first in the eastern states of Saxony and Thuringia and came in second in two other former East German states. Thus, although the AfD does not appear poised for rapid growth, it remains a threat from the far right and has continued to enjoy outsized success in what used to be East Germany. “Der Bundeswahlleiter,” accessed November 19, 2021, https://www.bundeswahlleiter.de.
3 Kowalczuk, Ilko-Sascha, Endspiel. Die Revolution von 1989 in der DDR (Munich: C. H. Beck, 2015), 536CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
4 Epstein, Catherine, “East Germany and Its History since 1989,” The Journal of Modern History 75, no. 3 (2003): 660CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Andrew I. Port, “Introduction: The Banalities of East German Historiography,” in Becoming East German, ed. Andrew I. Port and Mary Fulbrook (New York: Berghahn Books, 2013), 1.
5 Miller, Barbara, The Stasi Files Unveiled: Guilt and Compliance in a Unified Germany (London: Routledge, 2004), 6–7Google Scholar.
6 Bruce, Gary, The Firm: The Inside Story of the Stasi (New York: Oxford University Press, 2010), 10Google Scholar.
7 Klaus Schroeder has been a particularly vociferous advocate of the totalitarianism hypothesis. Klaus Schroeder, Der SED-Staat. Partei, Staat und Gesellschaft (Munich: Hanser, 1998), 621–48; Schroeder, Klaus and Staadt, Jochen, “Der diskrete Charme des Status Quo. DDR-Forschung in der Ära der Entspannungspolitik,” Leviathan 21, no. 1 (1993): 24–63Google Scholar. This language also shows up widely in the Anglophone literature, including Norman M. Naimark, The Russians in Germany: A History of the Soviet Zone of Occupation, 1945–1949 (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1995), 397; Charles S. Maier, Dissolution: The Crisis of Communism and the End of East Germany (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1999), 35. See too Corey Ross's excursis on theoretical approaches to the East German state: Corey Ross, The East German Dictatorship: Problems and Perspectives in the Interpretation of the GDR (New York: Bloomsbury, 2002), 19–43.
8 Hans-Ulrich Wehler, “Ein deutsches Säkulum?”, Berliner Zeitung, August 8, 1996; Alf Lüdtke, “‘Helden der Arbeit’—Mühen beim Arbeiten. Zur mißmutigen Loyalität von Industriearbeitern in der DDR,” in Sozialgeschichte der DDR, ed. Hartmut Kaelble, Jürgen Kocka, and Hartmut Zwahr (Stuttgart: Klett-Cotta, 1994), 188.
9 Anna Funder, Stasiland: Stories from Behind the Berlin Wall (New York: Harper Perennial, 2011); Das Leben Der Anderen (dir. Florian Henckel von Donnersmarck, Germany, 2006).
10 Andrew Demshuk, Bowling for Communism: Urban Ingenuity at the End of East Germany (Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 2020), 6.
11 Andrew I. Port, Conflict and Stability in the German Democratic Republic (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2007), 115; Paul Betts, Within Walls: Private Life in the German Democratic Republic (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2010), 173–77; Josie McLellan, Love in the Time of Communism: Intimacy and Sexuality in the GDR (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2011). On gender politics in East Germany, see too Donna Harsch, Revenge of the Domestic: Women, the Family, and Communism in the German Democratic Republic (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2008).
12 Mary Fulbrook, The People's State: East German Society from Hitler to Honecker (New Haven: Yale University Press, 2008), 1.
13 Fulbrook, The People’s State, 10.
14 Eli Rubin, Amnesiopolis: Modernity, Space, and Memory in East Germany (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2016), 20.
15 Paul Stangl, Risen from the Ruins: The Cultural Politics of Rebuilding East Berlin (Palo Alto: Stanford University Press, 2018), 192.
16 As noted above, “normality” and “normalization,” which are most closely associated with Mary Fulbrook's work, have become signal concepts through which historians view East German society. Some scholars, such as Paul Betts, refer to how ordinary East Germans experienced a certain “normalization” of their daily lives under state socialism. Fulbrook defines normalization as a useful descriptor “to explore questions concerning the relative stabilisation of domestic political structures and processes [and] the degrees of routinisation and predictability of everyday practices.” However used, the term contains an implicit rebuke of the totalitarian model, implying both restraint on state power and individual agency within the confines of certain norms. Betts, Within Walls, 38; Mary Fulbrook, “The Concept of ‘Normalisation’ and the GDR in Comparative Perspective,” in Power and Society in the GDR, 1961–1979: The ‘Normalisation of Rule’?, ed. Mary Fulbrook (New York: Berghahn Books, 2009), 13.
17 Schwenkel, Christina, Building Socialism: The Afterlife of East German Architecture in Urban Vietnam (Durham, NC: Duke University Press, 2020), 2Google Scholar.
18 For more on East German solidarity efforts, see Quinn Slobodian, ed., Comrades of Color: East Germany in the Cold War World (New York: Berghahn Books, 2015).
19 Fleischman, Thomas, Communist Pigs: An Animal History of East Germany's Rise and Fall (Seattle: University of Washington Press, 2020), 9Google Scholar.
20 On the historiography of human rights, see, inter alia, Moyn, Samuel, The Last Utopia: Human Rights in History (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Moyn, Not Enough: Human Rights in an Unequal World (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2018); Whyte, Jessica, The Morals of the Market: Human Rights and the Rise of Neoliberalism (London: Verso Books, 2019)Google Scholar.
21 Richardson-Little, Ned, The Human Rights Dictatorship: Socialism, Global Solidarity and Revolution in East Germany (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2020), 54CrossRefGoogle Scholar. For more on the Hallstein Doctrine, see Gray, William Glenn, Germany's Cold War: The Global Campaign to Isolate East Germany, 1949–1969 (Chapel Hill: The University of North Carolina Press, 2003)Google Scholar.
22 Harrison, Hope M., After the Berlin Wall: Memory and the Making of the New Germany, 1989 to the Present (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2019), 47CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
23 Saunders, Anna, Memorializing the GDR: Monuments and Memory after 1989 (New York: Berghahn Books, 2018), 173, 297CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
24 Bouma, Amieke, German Post-Socialist Memory Culture: Epistemic Nostalgia (Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press, 2019), 281Google Scholar.
25 Port, “Introduction,” 23–24.