No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
The West German and Italian Left in the “Two Cultures” Debate: Trasnationalization and Localization (1964–1969)
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 01 April 2024
Abstract
This article delves into the transnational aspects of the “Two Cultures” debate initiated by the British chemist and writer C. P. Snow, and explores how Italian and West German intellectuals localized and translated aspects of the debate within their respective political landscapes. Snow described the relationship between science and the humanities, and attributed a unique social responsibility to science. Prominent leftist thinkers, including Gino Martinoli, Adriano Buzzati Traverso, Aldo Visalberghi, Giulio Preti, Pier Paolo Pasolini, Karl Steinbuch, Hans Mohr, Hilde Domin, Jürgen Habermas, and Robert Jungk, engaged Snow's ideas, each formulating their stance on the role of science. These intellectuals were divided in their response. Some concurred with Snow, viewing scientific advancement as a cornerstone of social progress and considering the scientific ethos as a model for political emulation. Others, however, were critical, questioning the very notions of scientific progress, rationality, and modernization. This intellectual discourse foreshadowed the New Left's critique of scientism in the 1970s, a movement that significantly challenged the longstanding marriage between socialism and science.
Keywords
- Type
- Article
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © The Author(s), 2024. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of Central European History Society of the American Historical Association
References
1 Collini, Stefan, to, Introduction The Two Cultures (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2012), xiii–xvGoogle Scholar; Hughes, H. Stuart, Consciousness and Society (New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publishers, 2002), 190–200Google Scholar.
2 James, Frank A. J. L., “Introduction: Some Significances of the Two Cultures Debate,” Interdisciplinary Science Reviews 41, no. 2–3 (2016): 114–15CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
3 De la Mothe, John, C. P. Snow and the Struggle of Modernity (Austin: University of Texas Press, 1992)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
4 Edgerton, David, Warfare State: Britain, 1920–1970 (Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University Press, 2006), 201Google Scholar.
5 Tomlinson, Jim, “Thrice Denied: ‘Declinism’ as a Recurrent Theme in British History in the Long Twentieth Century,” Twentieth Century British History 20, no. 2 (2009): 227–51CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Clarke, Peter F. and Trebilcock, Clive, ed., Understanding Decline: Perceptions and Realities of British Economic Performance (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1997)Google Scholar.
6 Collini, Introduction to The Two Cultures; Guy Ortolano, The Two Cultures Controversy: Science, Literature and Cultural Politics in Postwar Britain (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2011); James, “Introduction: Some Significances of the Two Cultures Debate.”
7 Ortolano, The Two Cultures Controversy, 12.
8 Snow, C. P., The Two Cultures, ed. Collini, Stefan (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
9 Ortolano, The Two Cultures Controversy, 9–11.
10 Gilman, Nils, Mandarins of the Future: Modernization Theory in Cold War America (Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press, 2003), 162Google Scholar.
11 Collini, Introduction The Two Cultures, xxxiii.
12 Ortolano, The Two Cultures Controversy, 75–81; Leavis, F. R., Two Cultures?: The Significance of C. P. Snow (New York: Cambridge University Press, 2013), 72CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
13 Dennis L. Dworkin, Cultural Marxism in Postwar Britain: History, the New Left, and the Origins of Cultural Studies (Durham, NC: Duke University Press, 1997), 80–81.
14 Samuel Moyn and Andrew Sartori, “Approaches to Global Intellectual History,” in Global Intellectual History, ed. Samuel Moyn and Andrew Sartori (New York: Columbia University Press, 2013), 3–30; Cristopher L. Hill, “Conceptual Universalization in the Transnational Nineteenth Century,” in Global Intellectual History, ed. Samuel Moyn and Andrew Sartori (New York: Columbia University Press, 2013), 134–58; Mats Andrén and Ettore Costa, “Introduction: Transnationalism in the 1950s Europe, Ideas, Debates and Politics,” History of European Ideas 46, no. 1 (2020): 1–12.
15 Emma Eldelin, “De två kulturerna” flyttar hemifrån: C. P. Snows begrepp i svensk idédebatt 1959–2005 (Stockholm: Carlsson, 2006).
16 Pierpaolo Antonello, Contro il materialismo: le “due culture” in Italia: bilancio di un secolo (Savigliano: N. Aragno, 2012), 249–71.
17 All the articles published in Paese Sera collected in Armando Vitelli, ed., La cultura dimezzata (Milano: Giordano, 1965).
18 Le due culture, Atti del convegno organizzato dall'Associazione per la ricerca scientifica italiana (ARSI) (Roma: Tumminelli, 1965), 25.
19 On science topics in West German press, see Axel Schildt, Medien-Intellektuelle in der Bundesrepublik (Göttingen: Wallstein Verlag, 2020), 514–19.
20 Helmut Kreuzer, ed., Literarische und Naturwissenschaftliche Intelligenz. Dialog über die 2 Kulturen (Stuttgart: Klett, 1969). References are to the 1987 reprint: Helmut Kreuzer, ed., Die zwei Kulturen. Literarische und naturwissenschaftliche Intelligenz; C. P. Snows These in der Diskussion (Munich: Dt. Taschenbuchverlag, 1987).
21 Wolfgang Laskowski, ed., Geisteswissenschaft und Naturwissenschaft. Ihre Bedeutung für den Menschen von Heute (Berlin: De Gruyter, 1970).
22 Stefan Berger, “Comparative History,” in Writing History: Theory and Practice, ed. Stefan Berger, Heiko Feldner, and Kevin Passmore (London: Hodder Arnold, 2003), 166–69.
23 Anthony Woodiwiss, Postmodernity USA: The Crisis of Social Modernism in Postwar America (London and Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications, 1993), 1–14.
24 Gilman, Mandarins of the Future, 6–16, 56–62.
25 Gabriele Metzler, Konzeptionen politischen Handelns von Adenauer bis Brandt. Politische Planung in der pluralistischen Gesellschaft (Paderborn: F. Schöningh, 2005), 151; Glen O'Hara, From Dreams to Disillusionment: Economic and Social Planning in 1960s Britain (Houndmills: Palgrave Macmillan, 2007); Jan-Werner Müller, Contesting Democracy: Political Ideas in Twentieth-Century Europe (New Haven, CN: Yale University Press, 2013), 143.
26 Jenny Andersson, The Future of the World: Futurology, Futurists, and the Struggle for the Post Cold War Imagination (Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press, 2018), 54–57.
27 Ettore Costa, “Whoever Launches the Biggest Sputnik Has Solved the Problems of Society? Technology and Futurism for Western European Social Democrats and Communists in the 1950s,” History of European Ideas 46, no. 1 (2020): 95–112.
28 Paul Thomas, Marxism and Scientific Socialism: From Engels to Althusser (London and New York: Routledge, 2008); Helena Sheehan, Marxism and the Philosophy of Science: A Critical History (Atlantic Highlands, NJ: Humanities Press, 1985).
29 Sheehan, Marxism and the Philosophy of Science, 294–301; Cristina Corradi, Storia Dei Marxismi in Italia (Roma: Manifestolibri, 2005), 69–72.
30 Martin Jay, Reason after Its Eclipse: On Late Critical Theory (Madison, WI: The University of Wisconsin Press, 2016), 97–113.
31 Sheehan, Marxism and the Philosophy of Science, 399–400.
32 Andrew Feenberg, “Heidegger and Marcuse: The Catastrophe and Redemption of Technology,” in Herbert Marcuse: A Critical Reader, ed. John Abromeit and W. Mark Cobb (New York: Routledge, 2004), 67–80; Steven Vogel, “Marcuse and the ‘New Science,’” in Herbert Marcuse: A Critical Reader, ed. John Abromeit and W. Mark Cobb (New York: Routledge, 2004), 240–45.
33 Corradi, Storia dei marxismi in Italia, 105–09.
34 Ulrich Beck, Risk Society: Towards a New Modernity (London: Sage Publications, 1992), 49; Konrad Jarausch, ed., Das Ende der Zuversicht? Die siebziger Jahre als Geschichte (Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht, 2008); Anselm Doering-Manteuffel and Lutz Raphael, Nach dem Boom: Perspektiven auf die Zeitgeschichte seit 1970 (Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht, 2008), 43; Philippe Chassaigne, Les années 1970. Une décennie révolutionnaire (Paris: Armand Colin, 2018).
35 Winfried Süß, “Der keynesianische Traum und sein langes Ende Sozioökonomischer Wandel und Sozialpolitik, in den siebziger Jahren,” in Das Ende der Zuversicht? Die siebziger Jahre als Geschichte, 120–37; Helga Nowotny, Peter Scott, and Michael Gibbons, Re-Thinking Science: Knowledge and the Public in an Age of Uncertainty (Cambridge: Polity Press, 2011), 5.
36 Ettore Costa, “The Western European Left and the First Moon Landing: The Fall of Scientific Enthusiasm and the Ebb of Socialism,” International History Review 44, no. 6 (2022): 1347–68.
37 Ortolano, The Two Cultures Controversy, 48–52.
38 Ortolano, The Two Cultures Controversy, 18.
39 Ortolano, The Two Cultures Controversy, 34.
40 Snow, The Two Cultures, 27.
41 Snow, The Two Cultures, 6–7.
42 Snow, The Two Cultures, 10, 32.
43 Snow, The Two Cultures, 48.
44 Collini, Introduction The Two Cultures; Ortolano, The Two Cultures Controversy, 33–37; Rupert Cole, “A Tale of Two Train Journeys: Lawrence Bragg, C. P. Snow and The ‘Two Cultures,’” Interdisciplinary Science Reviews 41, no. 2–3 (July 2, 2016): 133–47; Gary Werskey, The Visible College (London: Allen Lane, 1978).
45 Snow, The Two Cultures, 7.
46 Ludovico Geymonat, “Prefazione,” in Armando Vitelli, La cultura dimezzata (Giordano, 1965), 21–22.
47 Geymonat, Prefazione in La cultura dimezzata, 17.
48 Associazione per la ricerca scientifica italiana, Le due culture atti del convegno (Tumminelli, 1965), 40.
49 Associazione per la ricerca scientifica italiana, Le due culture atti del convegno, 17–19; Alessandro Alberigi Quaranta, “La scienza deve divenire popolare” in La cultura dimezzata, 151.
50 Associazione per la ricerca scientifica italiana, Le due culture atti del convegno, 58–59.
51 Stephen Gundle, Between Hollywood and Moscow: The Italian Communists and the Challenge of Mass Culture, 1943–1991 (Durham, NC: Duke University Press, 2000), 19–26; Antonello, Contro il Materialismo, 139–55.
52 Fabio Lavista, “MARTINOLI, Gino in ‘Dizionario Biografico,’” https://www.treccani.it/enciclopedia/gino-martinoli_(Dizionario-Biografico)/.
53 Gino Martinoli, “Sterili lamentele di certi umanisti,” Corriere della Sera, December 8, 1964; Gino Martinoli, “La tecnica non basta,” Corriere della Sera, January 26, 1965.
54 Associazione per la ricerca scientifica italiana, Le due culture atti del convegno, 49.
55 Associazione per la ricerca scientifica italiana, Le due culture atti del convegno, 60–61.
56 Bernardino Fantini, “BUZZATI TRAVERSO, Adriano in ‘Dizionario Biografico,’” https://www.treccani.it/enciclopedia/adriano-buzzati-traverso_(Dizionario-Biografico)/.
57 Adriano Buzzati Traverso, “Opinione pubblica e cultura scientifica,” Corriere della Sera, June 16, 1964.
58 Adriano Buzzati Traverso, “Il sapere scientifico e l'uomo della strada,” Corriere della Sera, September 8, 1964.
59 Adriano Buzzati Traverso, “Civiltà tecnica,” Corriere della Sera, November 24, 1964. All translations from Italian and German mine, unless otherwise stated.
60 Aldo Visalberghi, “Anima divisa,” Corriere della Sera, August 12, 1964.
61 Aldo Visalberghi, “Equazioni e romanzi,” Corriere della Sera, September 23, 1964.
62 Giuseppe Zanniello, “L'avvio della ricerca empirica in campo educativo in Italia: il contributo di Calonghi e Visalberghi,” ECPS—Educational, Cultural and Psychological Studies, no. 9 (June 2014): 185–201.
63 Elio Vittorini, “L'umanesimo tradizionale deve togliersi dalla scena,” in Cultura dimezzata, 135–44.
64 Vittorini, in La cultura dimezzata, 138.
65 Lionel Trilling, “Science, Literature, and Culture: A Comment on the Leavis-Snow Controversy,” Commentary (June 1962) 462–63.
66 James C. Scott, Seeing Like a State: How Certain Schemes to Improve the Human Condition Have Failed (New Haven, CN: Yale University Press, 2008), 94.
67 Lucio Lombardo Radice, “Ragione scientifica, pace, socialismo,” L’Unità, September 16, 1964.
68 Pier Paolo Pasolini, “Fare nostro il rischio della scienza,” in La cultura dimezzata, 73–76.
69 Dina Bertoni Jovine, “La distinzione di Snow è schematica,” in La cultura dimezzata, 158–61.
70 Angiola Massucco Costa, “Esiste una terza cultura,” in La cultura dimezzata, 54–57.
71 Associazione per la ricerca scientifica italiana, Le due culture atti del convegno, 25.
72 Associazione per la ricerca scientifica italiana, Le due culture atti del convegno, 51–52.
73 Alberto Moravia, “La scienza vuole un uomo umile,” in La cultura dimezzata, 45–47.
74 Pier Paolo Pasolini, “Fare nostro il rischio della scienza,” in La cultura dimezzata, 76.
75 Carlo Castagnoli, “La barbarie della specializzazione,” in La cultura dimezzata, 103.
76 Giulio Maccacaro, “La scienza come creazione,” Corriere della Sera, September 1, 1964.
77 Giulio Preti, Retorica e logica (Torino: Einaudi, 1968), 10.
78 Preti, Retorica e logica, 18–20, 25–27.
79 Preti, Retorica e logica, 12.
80 Preti, Retorica e logica, 18–22.
81 Preti, Retorica e logica, 22.
82 Karl Steinbuch, Falsch Programmiert (Stuttgart: Deutscher Taschenbuch, 1968), 7.
83 Steinbuch, Falsch Programmiert, 163.
84 Sean A. Forner, German Intellectuals and the Challenge of Democratic Renewal: Culture and Politics after 1945 (Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University Press, 2014), 118–21.
85 Steinbuch, Falsch Programmiert, 7–18, 21.
86 Steinbuch, Falsch Programmiert, 20–24.
87 Steinbuch, Falsch Programmiert, 18.
88 Steinbuch, Falsch Programmiert, 44–45.
89 Steinbuch, Falsch Programmiert, 73–74.
90 Steinbuch, Falsch Programmiert, 99, 162.
91 Steinbuch, Falsch Programmiert, 169–70.
92 Steinbuch, Falsch Programmiert, 36–37.
93 Steinbuch, Falsch Programmiert, 100–115.
94 Steinbuch, Falsch Programmiert, 128.
95 Andersson, The Future of the World.
96 Steinbuch, Falsch Programmiert, 150.
97 Steinbuch, Falsch Programmiert, 152.
98 Steinbuch, Falsch Programmiert, 117.
99 Steinbuch, Falsch Programmiert, 59, 143–44.
100 Steinbuch, Falsch Programmiert, 156.
101 Achim Eberspächer, Das Projekt Futurologie. Über Zukunft und Fortschritt in der Bundesrepublik 1952–1982 (Leiden and Boston: Ferdinand Schöningh, 2019); Anton F. Guhl, “Kurskorrekturen eines Technokraten. Die politische Rechtswendung des Nachrichtentechnikers und Zukunftsforschers Karl Steinbuch nach 1970,” Technikgeschichte 87, no. 4 (2020): 315–34.
102 Steinbuch, Falsch Programmiert, 36–37.
103 Steinbuch, Falsch Programmiert, 70.
104 Hans Mohr, “Wissenschaft und Bildung—Stellungnahme eines Naturwissenschaftlers zu den Thesen von C.P. Snow,” in Die zwei Kulturen, 229–53.
105 Mohr, Wissenschaft und Bildung—Stellungnahme eines Naturwissenschaftlers zu den Thesen von C.P. Snow,” 244.
106 Mohr, Wissenschaft und Bildung—Stellungnahme eines Naturwissenschaftlers zu den Thesen von C.P. Snow,” 242.
107 Helmut Kreuzer, “Literarische und szientifische Intelligenz,” in Die zwei Kulturen, 206.
108 Kreuzer, “Literarische und szientifische Intelligenz,” 215.
109 Wolfgang Laskowski, “Zusammenschau und Perspektiven,” in Geisteswissenschaft und Naturwissenschaft, 186–87.
110 Helmut Glubrecht, “Ist unsere Kultur gespalten?,” in Die zwei Kulturen, 271.
111 Hilde Domin, “Eine Kultur oder keine Kultur—Die Zwei-Kulturen-Streit als Schienkonflikt,” in Die zwei Kulturen, 181–94.
112 Domin, “Eine Kultur oder keine Kultur—Die Zwei-Kulturen-Streit als Schienkonflikt,” 184.
113 August Nitschke, “Ein Plädoyer für die andere Kultur,” in Die zwei Kulturen, 275–88.
114 Nitschke, “Ein Plädoyer für die andere Kultur,” 287.
115 Jürgen Habermas, “Technischer Fortschritt und soziale Lebenswelt,” in Die zwei Kulturen, 313–27.
116 Jürgen Habermas, Toward a Rational Society: Student Protest, Science and Politics, trans. Jeremy J. Shapiro (London: Heinemann Educational, 1971), 57. Quotations from the English edition.
117 Robin Celikates and Rahel Jaeggi, “Technology and Reification,” in The Habermas Handbook, ed. Hauke Brunkhorst, Regina Kreide, and Cristina Lafont (New York: Columbia University Press, 2018); Habermas, Toward a Rational Society, 60, 86–90; Jay, Reason after Its Eclipse, 121.
118 Adelheid Voskuhl, “Emancipation in the Industrial Age: Technology, Rationality, and the Cold War in Habermas's Early Epistemology and Social Theory,” Modern Intellectual History 13, no. 2 (August 2016): 486.
119 Habermas, Toward a Rational Society, 59.
120 Habermas, Toward a Rational Society, 118–19.
121 Habermas, Toward a Rational Society, 56.
122 Voskuhl, “Emancipation in the Industrial Age.”
123 Leavis, Two Cultures?, 54.
124 Stefan Collini, Introduction to Two Cultures?, 2–9.
125 Ortolano, The Two Cultures Controversy, 218.
126 Dworkin, Cultural Marxism in Postwar Britain, 80.
127 Dworkin, Cultural Marxism in Postwar Britain, 227.
128 John Guillory, “The Sokal Affair and the History of Criticism,” Critical Inquiry 28, no. 2 (2002): 470–508. Quoted in Ortolano, The Two Cultures Controversy, 218.
129 David A. Hollinger, “Science as a Weapon in Kulturkampfe in the United States during and after World War II,” Isis 86, no. 3 (1995): 449. Quoted in Ortolano, The Two Cultures Controversy, 218.
130 Walter Pedullà, “Resa di un “moderno”,” Avanti!, 21 October 1966.
131 Wolfgang Laskowski, “Das Meschenbild des Naturwissenschaftlers,” in Geisteswissenschaft und Naturwissenschaft, 180.
132 Laskowski, “Zusammenschau und Perspektiven,” 191.
133 Franco Ferrarotti, “Non serve spiegare Shakespeare agli ingegneri,” in Cultura dimezzata, 63.
134 Associazione per la ricerca scientifica italiana, Le due culture atti del convegno, 32.
135 Edoardo Sanguineti, “Le due politiche,” in Cultura dimezzata, 187–92.
136 Max Born, “Die Zerstörung der Ethik durch die Naturwissenschaft—Überlegungen eines Physikers,” in Die zwei Kulturen, 254–61.
137 Nitschke, “Ein Plädoyer für die andere Kultur,” 279–84.
138 Klaus Schaller, “Das Menschenbild des Geistwissenschaftlers,” in Geisteswissenschaft und Naturwissenschaft. Ihre Bedeutung für den Menschen von Heute, ed. Wolfgang Laskowski (Berlin: De Gruyter, 1970), 132.
139 Domin, “Eine Kultur oder keine Kultur—Die Zwei-Kulturen-Streit als Schienkonflikt,” 184.
140 Robert Jungk, “Der Einbruch der Naturwissenschaft und Technik in Unser Heutiges Leben,” in Geisteswissenschaft und Naturwissenschaft. Ihre Bedeutung für den Menschen von Heute, ed. Wolfgang Laskowski (Berlin: De Gruyter, 1970), 117–18.
141 Giulio Preti, Retorica e Logica, 56–58.
142 Helen Haste, “Pluralism, Perspective, Order and Organization: The Fault-Lines of 21st Century ‘Cultures’ and Epistemologies,” Interdisciplinary Science Reviews 41, no. 2–3 (July 2, 2016): 176–82.
143 Margret Boveri, “Zeuge einer Überwundenen Epoche,” Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung, November 28, 1970.
144 Helmut Kreuzer, “Vorwort zur Taschenbuchausgabe,” in Die zwei Kulturen, 11–17.
145 Kreuzer, “Vorwort zur Taschenbuchausgabe,” 12.
146 Patrick Wöhrle, “Das Denken und die Dinge. Intellektuelle Selbst- und Fremdverortungen in den 1960er und 1970er Jahren am Beispiel der ‘Technokratie’-Debatte,” in Intellektuelle in der Bundesrepublik Deutschland. Verschiebungen im Politischen Feld der 1960er und 1970er Jahre, ed. Thomas Kroll and Tilman Reitz (Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht, 2013), 57.
147 Snow, The Two Cultures, 7; Steinbuch, Falsch Programmiert, 22–23; Rosario Romeo, “Letteratura e bombe atomiche,” Corriere della Sera, October 4, 1964; Domin, “Eine Kultur oder keine Kultur—Die Zwei-Kulturen-Streit als Schienkonflikt,” 182.
148 Jungk, “Der Einbruch der Naturwissenschaft und Technik in unser heutiges Leben,” 114; Antonello, Contro il materialismo, 257–58.
149 XI Congresso del Partito Comunista Italiano: Atti e risoluzioni (Roma: Editori riuniti, 1966), 386.
150 XI Congresso del Partito Comunista Italiano, 727.
151 SPD Parteitag Nürnberg 1968 Protokoll (Bonn: Vorstand der SPD, 1968), 518–19.
152 Eberspächer, Das Projekt Futurologie, 243–55.
153 Jungk, “Der Einbruch der Naturwissenschaft und Technik in Unser Heutiges Leben,” 122.
154 Ortolano, The Two Cultures Controversy, 233–37.
155 Dill, Hans-Otto, “Globalisierte Wirtschaft und Multikulturelle Welt,” Sitzungsberichte der Leibniz-Sozietät 83 (2006): 107–31Google Scholar.
156 Armando Plebe, “Snow manca di obiettività,” in Cultura dimezzata, 39.
157 Ortolano, The Two Cultures Controversy, 249–53.
158 Armando Vitelli, “La cultura e la bomba,” in Cultura dimezzata, 33.
159 Gilman, Mandarins of the Future, 250.
160 Scott, Seeing Like a State, 344; Doering-Manteuffel and Raphael, Nach dem Boom, 50–52.