Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-767nl Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-13T00:15:41.496Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Adjustment of Adopted Children — Prognosis from Maternal and Natal risk factors

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 February 2024

J. Kraus
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

The medical examination of the newborn infant for adoption should reduce the risk of the prospective parents adopting a child with a potentially serious disease or abnormality, and ensure that the infant being adopted is healthy (Betheras, 1976). Genetic and clinically obvious conditions apart, an early detection of brain damage was said to be of highest importance in such an examination, because adopting parents “… find it insupportable if a child cannot respond adequately to their love and affection” (Tizard, 1969, p. 44). However, because even gross brain damage may be undetectable in the early weeks of life, and the prediction of future development of the neonate is seldom possible from a paediatric examination (Tizard, 1969; Karelitz, 1956), there appear to be only very limited prospects to reduce “… the magnitude of the risk that adoptive parents must taken when they adopt newborn infants” (Karelitz, 1956, p. 94).

Type
Research Article
Information
Children Australia , Volume 3 , Issue 2 , July 1978 , pp. 26 - 37
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1978

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

*

M.A. (hons), Ph.D., Dip.Psych., Dip.Crim., Dip.Anthrop., Senior Research Officer. The views expressed in this article are not necessarily those of the Department of Youth and Community Services.

References

Advisory Council on Child Care (1970) A Guide to Adoption Practice. H.M.S.O., London.Google Scholar
Apgar, V. (1957) The first twelve minutes. Transact. New Engl. Obstet. Gynec. Soc., 11, 39–47.Google ScholarPubMed
Betheras, F.R. (1976) Medical assessment of the newborn infant for adoption. Proceedings of First Australian Conference on Adoption, 15th-20th February, 1976. University of New South Wales, Sydney.Google Scholar
Bohman, M, (1970) Adopted Children and their Families. Proprius, Stockholm.Google Scholar
Buckle, D., Lebovici, S. (1960) Child Guidance Centres, W.H.O., Geneva.Google Scholar
Cattell, R.B. & Coan, R.W. (1957) Personality factors in middle childhood as revealed in parents' ratings. Child Dev., 28, 439–458.Google Scholar
Chou, Y. (1970) Statistical Analysis. Holt, Rinehart & Winston, London.Google Scholar
Cochran, W.G. (1953) Sampling Techniques. Wily & Sons, New York.Google Scholar
Davie, R., Butler, N. & Goldstein, H. (1972) From Birth to Seven: a Report of the National Child Development Study. Longman, New York.Google Scholar
De LaCruz, F.F. (1969) The high-risk infant; implications in adoption. Clin. Paediat., 8, 516–525.Google Scholar
Drillien, C.M. (1964) The Growth and Development of the Prematurely Born Infant. Livingston, Edinburgh.Google Scholar
Edwards, A.W.F. (1971) Science, statistics and Society. Nature, 233, 17–19.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Egan, D. (1969) Preliminary observations on a survey of children. Medical Group Papers 1. The Standing Conference of Societies Registered for Adoption. University Press, Aberdeen.Google Scholar
Fanshell, D. (1962) Approaches to measuring adjustment in adoptive parents. In: Quantitative Approaches to Parent Selection. Child Welfare League of America, New York.Google Scholar
Graham, P. & Rutter, M. (1973) Psychiatric disorder in the young adolescent: a follow-up study. Proc. R. Soc. Med., 66, 1226–1229.Google Scholar
Grunseit, F. (1976) The placement and adoption of children with special needs. Proceedings of the First Australian Conference on Adoption, 15th-20th February, 1976. University of New South Wales, Sydney.Google Scholar
Herzberg, B. & Herzberg, L. (1977) Brain damage and abnormal behaviour in children. Med. J. Aust., 1, 853–855.Google Scholar
Hoopes, J.L., (1967) An Infant Rating Scale: Its Validation and Usefulness. Child Welfare League of America, New York.Google Scholar
Kanner, L. (1960) Child Psychiatry. (3rd ed.) Charles C. Thomas, Springfield.Google Scholar
Karelitz, S. (1956) Paediatrics and adoption. In: Schapiro, M. (Ed.) A Study of Adoption Practice, vol. II. Child Welfare League of America, New York.Google Scholar
Kellmer Pringle, M.L. (1967) Adoption — Facts and Fallacies. Longmans, Green & Co., London.Google Scholar
Kellmer Pringle, M.L., Butler, N.R., Davie, R. (1966) 11000 Seven-Year-Olds. Longmans, Green & Co., London.Google Scholar
Kenny, T., Baldwin, R. & Mackie, J.B. (1967) Incidence of minimal brain injury in adopted children. Child Welf., 46, 24–29.Google Scholar
Kraus, J. (1972) Use of Bayes's Theorem in clinical decision. Brit. J. Psychiat., 120, 561–567.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kraus, J. (1975) Effect of anonymity on response of adoptive parents to a child-problem questionnaire. Aust. Soc. Work, 28, 37–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lawder, E.A., Lower, K.D., Andrews, R.G., Sherman, E.A., Hill, J.G. (1969) A Follow-up Study of Adoptions: Postplacement Functioning of Adoption Families. Child Welfare League of America, New York.Google Scholar
Maccoby, E.E. (1959) The interview: a tool of social science. In: Lindzey, G. (Ed.) Handbook of Social Psychology, vol. 1. Addison-Wesley, Reading.Google Scholar
Maxwell, A.E. (1961) Analysing Qualitative Data. Methuen & Co., London.Google Scholar
McFarlane, J.W., Allen, L. & Honzik, M.P. (1954) A Development Study of the Behaviour Problems of Normal Children Between 21 Months and 14 Years. University of California Press, Berkeley.Google Scholar
Mech, E.V. (1963) Post Placement Functioning in Adoptive Families: A Questionnaire Survey. (mimeograph) Graduate Department of Social Work and Social Research, Bryn Mawr College, Bryn Mawr.Google Scholar
Minde, K., Webb, G. & Sykes, D. (1968) Studies on the hyperactive child. Prenatal and paranatal factors associated with hyperactivity. Develop. Med. Child. Neurol., 10, 355–363.Google Scholar
Nelson, W.E.(1969) Textbook of Paediatrics. Saunders, Philadelphia.Google Scholar
Overall, J.E. & Gorham, D.R. (1963) A pattern probability model for the classification of psychiatric patients. Behav. Scie., 8, 108–116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pasamanick, B. & Knobloch, H. (1960) Brain damage and reproductive casualty. Amer. J. Orthopsychiat., 30, 298–305.Google Scholar
Pasamanick, B. & Lilienfeld, A.M. (1955) Association of maternal and fetal factors with development of mental deficiency. I. Abnormalities in prenatal and paranatal periods. J. Amer. Med. Assoc., 159, 155–160.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pasamanick, B., Rogers, M.E. & Lilienfeld, A.M. (1956) Pregnancy experience and the development of behaviour disorders in children. Amer. J. Psychiat., 112, 613–618.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rendle-Short, J. (1977) Paediatric assessment centres in Great Britain. Med. J. Aust., 2, 99–102.Google Scholar
Richman, N. & Graham, P.J. (1971) A behaviour screening questionnaire for use with three-year-old children: preliminary findings. J. Child Psychol. Psychiat., 12, 5–33.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Richman, N., Stevenson, J.E. & Graham, P.J. (1957) Prevalence of behaviour problems in 3-year-old children: an epidemological study in a London borough. J. Child Psychol. Psychiat., 16, 277–287.Google Scholar
Richmond, J.B. (1956) Criteria for predictability. In: Schapiro, M. (Ed.) A Study of Adoption Practice. Child Welfare League of America, New York.Google Scholar
Rutter, M. (1977) Brain damage syndromes in childhood: concepts and findings. J. Child Psychol. Psychiat., 18, 1–21.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rutter, M., Graham, P. & Yule, B. (1970) A Neuropsychiatirc Study in Childhood: Clinics in Developmental Medicine. Heinemann, London.Google Scholar
Rutter, M., Tizard, J. & Whitmore, K. (1970) Education, Health and Behaviour. Longman, London.Google Scholar
Silver, L.B. (1970) Frequency of adoption in children with neurological learning disability syndrome. J. Learn. Disab., 3, 306–310.Google Scholar
Sines, J.O. (1970) Actuarial versus clinical prediction in Psychopathology. Brit. J. Psychiat., 116, 129–144.Google Scholar
Stott, D.H. (1969) The child's hazards in utero. In: Howells, J.G. (Ed.) Modern Perspectives in International Child Psychiatry. Oliver & Boyd, London.Google Scholar
Thierauf, R.J. & Grosse, R.A. (1970) Decision Making Through Operations Research. Wiley & Sons, New York.Google Scholar
Tizard, J.P.M. (1969) A paediatrician's view. Medical Group Papers I. The Standing Conference of Societies Registered for Adoption. University Press, Aberdeen.Google Scholar
Ucko, L.A. (1965) A comparative study of asphyxiated and non-asphyxiated boys from birth to five years. Devel. Med. Child Neurol., 7, 643–648.Google Scholar
Werner, E., Simonian, B.S., Bierman, J.M. & French, E.F. (1967) Cumulative effect of perinatal complications and deprived environment on physical, intellectual and social development in preschool children. Paediatrics, 39, 490–505.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wolff, S. (1967) The contribution of obstetric complications to the etiology of behaviour disorders in childhood. J. Child Psychol. Psychiat., 8, 57–66.Google Scholar
Witmer, H.L., Herzog, E., Weinstein, E.A., Sullivan, M.E. (1963) Independent Adoptions. A Follow-up Study. Russell Sage Foundation, New York.Google Scholar
Young, P.V. (1966) Scientific Social Surveys and Research. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, N.J. Google Scholar