No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
Child Welfare in Victoria
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 29 February 2024
Extract
The purpose of this paper has two major aspects. First, it provides an opportunity of presenting an overview of some of the innovations and recent developments in the field of Child Welfare in Victoria. Second, it poses a challenge to make some comment on what these developments might actually add up to; in other words, it begs the question of whether one can make some sort of sense of what is going on. When you are working “in the field”, or as we would say with equally telling imagery in the U.K., “at the coal face”, you cannot always be aware of the implications and ramifications of what you are doing. True, the managers and the planners of your operations must, and do, give thought to this, but for the majority of us, beset by the problems of everyday work routines, it is hard to lift one's glance beyond the eye-level plane; what is more, one is too exhausted to read the unabating volume of reports and articles and statements that are around.
- Type
- Lorne Papers
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1977
References
Notes and References
1. see the Ministerial Statement by the Hon.Dixon, B.J., M.P. 27 April 1977, on the Victorian Family and Community Services Programme Google Scholar
for a rationale of the regionalisation programme see Report of the Committee of Enquiry into Child Care Services in Victoria, July 1976, in particular p.p. 20-22. see also V.C.O.S.S., The Localisation of Health and Welfare Services, 1971.Google Scholar
Benjamin, C. and Morton, J., A Model for Welfare Planning and Delivery, Agps, 1971.Google Scholar
2. Report of the Child Maltreatment Workshop, Melbourne, 1976 Google Scholar
3. Project Care, Children Parents Community, Australian Government Social Welfare Commission, Canberra, 1974 Google Scholar
4. Fearn-Wannan, B., Government Subsidized day care Centres in Victoria, Day Care Research Project No.2, 1975 Google Scholar
5. Evaluation Report of the Child Care Catalyst Program in Victoria, Centre for Urban Studies, Swinburne College of Technology, Melbourne, 1977 Google Scholar
6. St. Anthony's From Kew to Footscray, Nov. 1976 Google Scholar
7. Social Welfare Department, Victoria, Annual Report 1974-1975, p.p. 21–29.Google Scholar
8. see Rutter, M., Maternal Deprivation Reassessed, Penguin Education, 1972 Google Scholar
see also Dinnage, R. and Kellmer Pringle, M., Residential Child Care Facts and Fallacies, Longmans, 1967 Google Scholar
9. Abstracted from: Alternatives for Caring for Children and Young Persons who are a Responsibility of The Social Welfare Department and Costs to the Social Welfare Department in Each Form of Care (Departmental paper), 1974–75
10. Survey of Child Care in Victoria, 1962-1964, Government Printer, Melbourne, 1964, p.p. 48–49.Google Scholar
11. Social Welfare Department Annual Report 1974-75, Table 4, p. 63.Google Scholar
12. Family Welfare Advisory Council — Ministry of Social Welfare, Victoria — Foster Care Seminar Report, Melbourne, 1974 Google Scholar
13. Paul, J., Report of the Feasibility Study in Foster Care in the North West Metropolitan Region, for the Family Welfare Advisory Council, Ministry of Social Welfare of Victoria, May, 1975 Google Scholar.
14. Childrens Protection Society (Victoria), Temporary Emergency Foster Care Pilot Project, Melbourne, 1975 Google Scholar.
15. Project Report on Alternatives to Wardship, April — July 1975, Children's Welfare Association, Victoria, Jan. 1976 Google Scholar.
16. Care Force Report 1976, St. John's Homes for Boys and Girls, Melbourne Google Scholar.
17. The last two have not yet issued publicly circulated reports, neither has the Social Welfare Department which has only recently commenced a project in the St. Kilda area.
18. Cox, F.M. et al (eds.), Community — Action, Planning, Development: A Casebook, F.E. Peacock, Hasca, 1974 Google Scholar.
19. Dargavel, R., Families and Children in Gippsland — Report of the Gippsland Family and Child Care Planning Committee, July 1976, Melbourne Google Scholar.
20. Apart from most of the local reports noted in the above references, this point is made with full emphasis in “The Family Study” in: McCaughey, J. et al, Who Cares — Family Problems Community Links and Helping Services, Sun Books, 1977 Google Scholar.