Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-fv566 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-24T08:15:09.580Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Social Development, its Contexts, and Child Welfare

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 February 2016

Extract

Child welfare agencies and workers are often so besieged by pressures from all sides that they may lose sight of their purposes. They may mistake their current programs for their reasons for being. Daily activities in agencies are frequently determined by crises in the lives of societally unintegrated children and youth. They may be called neglected and/or abused, disturbed and/or deliquent. What they tend to have in common, whatever label they are given, is that they are somehow peripheral to their society, undervalued by it, and often victimized. Is it any wonder that children and youth become alienated, feeling unbelonging and depressed? Or that there are high staff turnover, under-funding and organizational emergencies in agencies mandated to provide primarily remedial (after-the-pain) services? Under these circumstances, practitioners have little opportunity to review the assumptions, as well as the effects of their daily work.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1987

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Barnes, M.J. The working through process in dealing with anxiety around adoption. American Journal Orthopsychiatry, 1953, 23, 605620.Google Scholar
Bass, C. Matchmaker-Matchmaker: Older Child adoption Failure. Child Welfare, 1975, 54, 505512.Google Scholar
Bell, V. Special consideration in the adoption of the older child. Social Casework, 1959, 40, 327334.Google Scholar
Bettelheim, B. Love is not enough. New York: Free Press, 1950. Avon Paperback, 1971.Google Scholar
Bowlby, J. Grief and mourning in infancy an early childhood. Psychoanalytic Study of the Child., 1960,15, 952.Google Scholar
Chema, R., Farley, L., Oakley, F.H., O'Brien, M. Adoptive placement of the older child, Child Welfare, 1970, 49, 450458.Google Scholar
Frailberg, S. A therapeutic approach to reactive ego disturbances in children in placement. American Journal Orthopsy-chiatry, 1962, 32, 1831.Google Scholar
Harper, J.F., Williams, S. Adopted children admitted to residential psychiatric care. Australian Journal Social Issues, 1976, 11, 4353.Google Scholar
Harvey, I.J. Adoption of Vietnamese Children: An Australian Study, Australian Journal Social Issues, 1983, 18, 5569.Google Scholar
Hoksbergen, R.A.C., (ed) Adoption of Children from Far Countries Deventer, 1979.Google Scholar
Humphrey, M., Ounsted, C. Adoptive families refered for psychiatric advice I The Children, British Journal Psychiatry, 1963, 109, 599603.Google Scholar
Jacobus, H. Operation propaganda, New Statesman, 11 May 1984.Google Scholar
Kadushin, A. Adopting Older Children, New York: Columbia University Press, 1970.Google Scholar
Kadushin, A. & Seidl, W. Adoption failure, A Social Work Postmortem, Social Work, 1971, 16, 3238.Google Scholar
Kim, D.S. Issues in transracial and trans-cultural adoption, Social Casework, 1978, 59, 477486.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krugman, D. Working with Separation, Child Welfare, 1971, 50, 528531.Google Scholar
Moss, S.Z. & Moss, M.S., Surrogate Mother-Child Relationships, American Journal Orthosdychiatry, 1975, 45, 381390.Google Scholar
Rickarby, G.A., Lee, M.M., Said, J. & Egan, P. Adoptive families in distress, Australian Journal Social Issues, 1981, 16, 3235.Google Scholar
Joseph, Sister Herman. Holy Cross Social Service Agency, New Delhi Personal Communication, 1985.Google Scholar
Mary, Sister Margaret, Mother Teresa's Calcutta, Personal Communication, 1985.Google Scholar
Sood, S. Indian Society for Sponsorship and Adoption, Calcutta, Personal Comunication, 1985.Google Scholar