Hostname: page-component-5c6d5d7d68-ckgrl Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-08-09T14:42:35.818Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Feasibility of Behavioural Assessment and Treatment in Residential Homes for Children

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 February 2024

Derek Jehu
Derek Jehu*
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology and School of Social Work, University of Manitoba, Canada, and Department of Social Work, Monash University
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

In two recent articles in this journal, a behavioural approach to childhood problems is discussed in the context of natural family situations (Griffin 1978, Herbert and O'Driscoll 1978). This paper extends the discussion to Residential Home settings, and can usefully be read in conjunction with the two earlier articles. It is based on our experience of implementing behavioural programmes of assessment and treatment with individual children living in the type of Residential Home that is administered by Social Services Departments in Britain, which I am told are very comparable to similar establishments in Australia. These Homes care for between 6 and 50 or more children, ranging in age from a few days to 18 years. The problems we have treated in such settings include nocturnal and diurnal enuresis, encopresis, self-care deficits in the retarded, and various forms of conduct disorder. The efficacy of this treatment is reported elsewhere (e.g. Jehu et al 1977), and the present discussion is restricted to its feasibility. Generally speaking, it appears to be a practicable and acceptable approach for the staff and children concerned, but inevitably there are certain obstacles and limitations which are outlined below. This concentration on sources of difficulty rather than strength, should not lead to an undue emphasis on the problems likely to be encountered or to any implication that these are insurmountable.

Type
Research Article
Information
Children Australia , Volume 4 , Issue 3 , Spring 1979 , pp. 18 - 23
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1979

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Berkowitz, B.P., and Graziano, A.M. (1972). Training parents as behaviour therapists: A review. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 10, 297–317.Google Scholar
Burchard, J.D., and Harig, P.T. (1976). Behaviour modification and juvenile deliquency. In Leitenberg, H. (Ed.), Handbook of Behaviour Modification and Behaviour Therapy. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey, 405–452.Google Scholar
Cone, J.D., and Sloop, E.W. (1974). Parents as agents of change. In Jacobs, A. and Spradlin, W. (Eds.), The Group as Agent of Change. Behaviour Publications, New York, 277–328.Google Scholar
Cornish, D.B., and Clarke, R.V.G. (1975). Residential Treatment and its Effects on Deliquency. H.M.S.O., London.Google Scholar
Graham, P. (1976). Management in child psychiatry: Recent trends. The British Journal of Psychiatry, 129, 97–108.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Griffin, M.W. (1978). Behaviour modification with children in natural environment. Australian Child and Family Welfare, 3, 8–13.Google Scholar
Herbert, M. (1978). Conduct Disorders of Childhood and Adolescence: A behavioural approach to assessment and treatment. Wiley, London and Brisbane.Google Scholar
Herbert, M., and O'Driscoll, B. (1978). Behavioural casework: A social work method for family settings. Australian Child and Family Welfare, 3, 14–25.Google Scholar
Jehu, D. (1976). A note on teaching behaviour modification to social work students. Bulletin of the British Association for Behavioural Psychotherapy, 4, 21–24.Google Scholar
Jehu, D., Hardiker, P., Shaw, M., and Yelloly, M. (1972) Behaviour Modification in Social Work, Wiley, London and Brisbane.Google Scholar
Jehu, D., Morgan, R.T.T., and Turner, R.K. (1977). A controlled trial of the treatment of nocturnal enuresis in Residential Homes for children. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 15, 1–16.Google Scholar
Johnson, C.A., and Katz, R.C. (1973). Using parents as change agents for their children: A review. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 14, 181–200.Google Scholar
Mash, E.J., Hamerlynck, L.A., and Handy, L.C. (Eds.) (1976a). Behaviour Modification and Families. Brunner Mazel, New York.Google Scholar
Mash, E.J., Handy, L.C., and Hamerlynck, L.A. (1976b). Behaviour Modification Approaches to Parenting. Brunner Mazel, New York.Google Scholar
O'Dell, S. (1974). Training parents in behaviour modification: A review. Psychological Bulletin, 81, 418–433.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Patterson, G.R. McNeal, S., Hawkins, N. and Phelps, R. (1967). Re-programming the social environment. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 8, 181–195.Google Scholar
Tizard, J., Sinclair, I., and Clarke, R.V.G. (Eds.) (1975). Varieties of Residential Experience. Routledge and Kegan Paul, London.Google Scholar
Wahler, R.G., (1976). Deviant child behaviour within the family: Developmental speculations and behaviour change strategies. In Leitenberg, H. (Ed.), Handbook of Behaviour Modification and Behaviour Therapy. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey, 516–546.Google Scholar