Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-7drxs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-24T08:24:42.573Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Rights and realities in the permanency debate

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 February 2016

Howard Bath
Howard Bath*
Affiliation:
Thomas Wright Institute, Canberra, Email: hbath@dynamite.com.au
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Permanent family placement for children unable to live with their birth families: Challenges and controversies
Information
Children Australia , Volume 25 , Issue 4 , 2000 , pp. 13 - 17
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2000

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

AIHW (2000a) Child protection Australia (Chapter 4, Out-of-home care, pp. 34–41). Canberra: Australian Institute of Health and Welfare (web page version).Google Scholar
AIHW (2000b) Adoptions Australia 1998–99. AIHW cat No. CWS 10. Canberra: Australian Institute of Health and Welfare (Child Welfare Series).Google Scholar
Barber, J. (1999) The slow demise of foster care in South Australia. Flinders University of South Australia, School of Social Administration and Social Work Google Scholar
Barth, R., Berry, M., Goodfield, R., & Carson, M. (1987) Older child adoption and disruption, Berkeley, CA: University of California, School of Social Work.Google Scholar
Bath, H. (1998) ‘Trends and issues in the out-of-home care of children in Australia’, International Journal of Child and Family Welfare, 98(2), 103–114.Google Scholar
Berrick, J., Barth, R. & Needell, B. (1994) ‘A comparison of kinship foster homes and foster family homes: Implications for kinship foster care as family preservation’, Children and Youth Services Review, 68, 81–108.Google Scholar
Borland, M., O’Hara, G. & Triseliotis, J. (1991) ‘Placement outcomes for children with special needs’, Adoption and Fostering, 15(2), 18–27.Google Scholar
Hollingsworth, L. (2000) ‘Adoption policy in the United States: A word of caution’, Social Work, 45(2), 183–186.Google Scholar
Hughes, D. (1997) Facilitating developmental attachment: The road to emotional recovery and behavioural change in foster and adoptive children, Northville, NJ: Jason Aronson.Google Scholar
NYSCCC (2000) Why are post adoption services needed in New York State?. New York State Citizens’ Coalition for Children, Inc. (web site, 2000).Google Scholar
Szwarc, B. (1985). Particular care reconsidered, The follow-up report of the 1979 survey into non-government children’s homes and foster care - 30th June 1984. Cheltenham: The Children’s Bureau of Australia.Google Scholar