Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-swr86 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-16T12:03:05.308Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

China's Anti-Confucian Campaign, 1973–74

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  17 February 2009

Merle Goldman
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Observers of the current Chinese scene have found the anti-Confucian campaign which dominated the Chinese press from the autumn of 1973 through 1974 to be extremely puzzling. At one level, most observers agree that the attack on Confucianism was what it appeared to be – a continuation of the communist effort to eradicate traditional habits and attitudes that have persisted despite the revolution. It was a campaign against elitism, bureaucratism, scorn of physical labour, and the inferior condition of women. Most important, it was the rejection of the Confucian values of idealism, humanism and conservatism.

Type
Research Article
Information
The China Quarterly , Volume 63 , September 1975 , pp. 435 - 462
Copyright
Copyright © The China Quarterly 1975

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. “Mao Tse-tung's private letter to Chiang Ch'ing,” Issues and Studies, Vol. IX, No. 4 (01 1973), p. 96.Google Scholar

2. China Information Service, Report on Mainland China, No. 26 (26 06 1972), p. 6.Google Scholar

3. This explanation was suggested by Benjamin Schwartz. I would also like to express appreciation to Robert Balaban who assisted me in the research.

4. Miscellany of Mao Tse-tung Thought (1949–1968)Google Scholar, Part II (Joint Publications Research Service, No. 61269–2), p. 334.Google Scholar

5. Jung-kuo, Yang, “The struggle between the two lines in the ideological sphere during the spring and autumn annals and the warring states,” Hung-ch'i (Red Flag), No. 12 (1972)Google Scholar, in Selections from China Mainland Magazines, Nos. 743–44, p. 53.Google Scholar

6. Ibid. p. 61.

7. Ibid. p. 62.

8. Ibid. p. 59.

9. Ibid. p. 60.

10. Ibid. p. 62.

11. Ting, Shih, “Fen-shu k'eng-ju pien” (“Analysis of ‘Book burning and burying scholars alive’”), Jen-min jih-pao (People's Daily), 28 09 1973, p. 2.Google Scholar

12. Ssu-ting, Lo, “The struggle for and against restoration in the course of the founding of the Ch'in dynasty – also on the social basis of the contention between the Confucianists and the Legalists,” Hung-ch'i, No. 11 (1973)Google Scholar, in Selections from People's Republic of China Magazines (SPRCM), Nos. 763–64, p. 44.Google Scholar

13. Shih Shang-hai, “Wang An-shih's Legalist ideas as viewed from the ‘Three nots,’” Ta kung pao, 22 October 1973, p. 6, in Foreign Broadcast Information Service, Daily Report, PRC (FBIS), 25 October 1973, p. B2.

14. Tso, Hsieh, “It is necessary to unite the vast majority – some appreciation on studying ‘On correct handling of contradictions among the peoples,’” Hung-ch'i, No. 4 (1974)Google Scholar, in FBIS, 23 04 1974, p. E4.Google Scholar

15. Ssu-ting, Lo, “On ‘The Spring and Autumn Annals’ of Mr. Lu,” Hung-ch'i, No. 4 (1974)Google Scholar, in FBIS, 15 04 1974, p. E2.Google Scholar

16. Ibid. p.E5.

17. Peking University and Tsinghua University criticism group, “Ch'in Shih-huang's progressive role in history,” in New China News Agency, 5 06 1974Google Scholar, and FBIS, 6 06 1974, p. E5.Google Scholar

18. Lun, Shih, “Lun tsun-ju fan-fa” (“On the worship of Confucianism and the opposition to Legalism”), Kuang-ming jih-pao (Kuang-ming Daily) (Kuangming), 7 10 1973, p. 2.Google Scholar

19. Ssu-ting, Lo, “The struggle for and against restoration,” p. 38.Google Scholar

20. Ssu-ting, Lo, “The development of the polemic between Confucianism and Legalism as seen from the reforms made by Wang An-shih – reading ‘A brief study of the annals of Wang An-shih,’” Hung-ch'i, No. 2 (1974)Google Scholar, in FBIS, 7 02 1974, p. B2.Google Scholar

21. Ssu-ting, Lo, “The struggle for and against restoration,” p. 43.Google Scholar

22. Ibid. p. 40.

23. Ssu-ting, Lo, “Struggle between restoration and counter-restoration in establishment of Ch'in dynasty – social basis of polemics between Confucian and Legalist schools,” Hung-ch'i (1974)Google Scholar, in FBIS, 27 02 1974, p. B4.Google Scholar

24. Ting, Shih, “Analysis of ‘Book burning and burying scholars alive.’”Google Scholar

25. Lun, Shih, “On the worship of Confucianism and the opposition to Legalism.”Google Scholar

26. No. 4 workshop of Shanghai watch plant, “Uphold national unification, oppose split – study the notes on Liu Tsung-yuan's ‘On the institution of ducal states,’” Peking Domestic Service, in FBIS, 16 07 1974, p. G7.Google Scholar

27. Ning, Chiang, “Consolidate and develop the great unity of the people of the whole country,” Hung-ch'i, No. 6 (1974)Google Scholar, in FBIS, 25 06 1974, p. B5.Google Scholar

28. Tao, Huang and Te, Chou, “T'u-ch'iung pi-shou chien fan-tung pai” (“The dagger which appears from an unrolling map fails to save the reactionaries”), Jen-min, 25 12 1973, p. 3.Google Scholar

29. Ssu-ting, Lo, “Struggle between restoration and counter-restoration,” p. B2.Google Scholar

30. Chung, Shih, “Spirit of ‘On feudalism,’ in honoring Confucianism and opposing Legalism,” Jen-min, 25 12 1973Google Scholar, in Survey of People's Republic of China Press (SPRCP), No. 5528, p. 4.Google Scholar

31. Shih, Li, “What was the decisive factor that enabled the Ch'in to unite the six states?” Hung-ch'i, No. 3 (1974)Google Scholar, in SPRCM, Nos. 771–72, pp. 13–20.Google Scholar

32. Fan, Yu, “Bankruptcy of Lin Piao's counter-revolutionary tactics,” Hung-ch'i, No. 5 (1974)Google Scholar, in Peking Review, No. 42 (18 10 1974), p. 11.Google Scholar

33. Jung-kuo, Vang, “The struggle of materialism in opposition to the idealist theory of a priorism during the Western Han and Eastern Han dynasties,”Google Scholar Peking Domestic Service, in FBIS, 6 02 1974, p. B3.Google Scholar

34. Ibid. p. B5.

35. Hsiao, Liang, “Study ‘On salt and iron’ – the big polemic between the Confucian and Legalist schools in the middle Western Han dynasty,” Hung-ch'i, No. 5 (1974)Google Scholar, in FBIS, 21 05 1974, p. E8.Google Scholar

36. Ibid.

37. Ibid. p. E7.

38. Ibid. p. E8.

39. Lun, Shih, “On the worship of Confucianism and the opposition to Legalism.”Google Scholar

40. Ting, Shih, “Analysis of ‘Book burning and burying scholars alive.’”Google Scholar

41. Criticism group of the Tientsin tyre plant, “Self denial and return to propriety means going backward,” Hung-ch'i, No. 2 (1974)Google Scholar, in FBIS, 13 02 1974, p. B2.Google Scholar

42. Chun, Che, “K'ung-tzu ti Chung-yung chih tao shih fan-tui she-hui pien-ko ti che-hüeh” (“The Confucian doctrine of the mean is the philosophy of opposing social reform”), Pei-ching jih-pao (Peking Daily), 4 01 1974Google Scholar, reprinted in Jen-min, 13 01 1974, p. 2Google Scholar, in FBIS, 16 01 1974, p. B3.Google Scholar

43. Ibid. p. B4.

44. “Fa-chia lu-hsien ts'u-chin wo kuo li-shih-shang ti k'e-hsüeh chi-shu ti fa-chan” (“The Legalist line has expedited the development of science and technology in our country's history”), Kuang-ming, 21 07 1974, p. 2.Google Scholar

45. Ibid.

46. Ssu-ting, Lo, “Struggle between restoration and counter-restoration,” p. B3.Google Scholar

47. Nan-ya, Tung, “Han Fei – the thinker opposed the restoration of the slave-owning aristocracy,” Kuang-ming, 11 04 1974Google Scholar, in SPRCP, No. 5601, p. 128.Google Scholar

48. Hsiao, Liang, “Study ‘On salt and iron,’” p. E4.Google Scholar

49. Jung-kuo, Yang, “The Confucian school and the Legalist school of the early Ch'in are fundamentally antagonistic in thought,” Kuang-ming, 24 08 1974Google Scholar, in SPRCP, No. 5690, p. 149.Google Scholar

50. Shanghai City Service, in British Broadcasting Corporation, Summary of World Broadcasts, Part III: The Far East, No. 4469 (16 12 1973), pp. B11–B15.Google Scholar

51. Ibid. p. 108.

52. Hsiao, Liang, “Study ‘On salt and iron,’” p. E6.Google Scholar

53. Ibid.

54. Ibid. p. E7.

55. Ssu-ting, Lo, “On the struggle between patriotism and national portrayal during the Northern Sung period,” Hung-ch'i, No. 11 (1974)Google Scholar, in FBIS, 20 11 1974, pp. E2–E3.Google Scholar

56. Ibid. p. E3.

57. Ibid. p. E4.

58. Ibid. p. E5.

59. Ibid. p. E6.

60. Peking Review, No. 48 (30 11 1973), p. 14.Google Scholar

61. “To negate the Great Cultural Revolution is to restore capitalism,” Cheng-Chow, , Honan Provincial Service, 22 03 1974Google Scholar, in FBIS, 25 03 1974, p. D3.Google Scholar

62. Lan, Ch'u, “Commenting on the Shansi opera ‘Three visits to T'aofeng,’” Jen-min, 28 02 1974, p. 2Google Scholar, in FBIS, 1 03 1974, p. B2.Google Scholar

63. Ibid. p. B7.

64. Taiyuan, , Shansi Provincial Service, 3 04 1974Google Scholar, in FBIS, 4 04 1974, p. K3.Google Scholar

65. Hangchow, Chekiang Provincial Service, in FBIS, 28 05 1974, p. G2.Google Scholar

66. Kiangsi jih-pao (Kiangsi Daily), 28 02 1974Google Scholar, in FBIS, 4 03 1974, p. C2.Google Scholar

67. Jan, Hao, “Carry proletarian revolution through to the end,” Peking Domestic Service, 30 04 1974Google Scholar, in FBIS, 6 05 1974, p. E9.Google Scholar

68. Hangchow, , Chekiang Provincial Service, in FBIS, 23 05 1974, p. G4.Google Scholar

69. Lan, Ch'u, “Revolution in Peking Opera over the past ten years,” Hung-ch'i, No. 7 (1974), in FBIS, 15 07 1974, p. E12.Google Scholar

70. Lan, Ch'u, “A psalm for which line in education? Comments on the Hunan opera ‘Song of the Gardener,’” SPRCP, No. 5676, pp. 143–48.Google Scholar

71. Ssu-ting, Lo, “Lun Ch'in-Han chih chi ti chieh-chi tou-cheng” (“On class struggle during the Ch'in and the Han dynasties”), Kuang-ming, 6 08 1974, p. 2Google Scholar; originally published in Hung-ch'i, No. 8 (1974).Google Scholar

72. Ibid. p. 2.

73. Wen-yuan, Yao, “On the social basis of the Lin Piao anti-Party clique,” Hung-ch'i, No. 3 (1975)Google Scholar, in Peking Review, No. 10 (7 03 1975), pp. 5–10.Google Scholar

74. Wakeman, Frederic Jr, “The use and abuse of ideology in the study of contemporary China,” The China Quarterly, No. 61 (1975), p. 138.Google Scholar

75. Solomon, Richard, “From commitment to cant: the evolving functions of ideology in the revolutionary process,” in Johnson, Chalmers (ed.), Ideology and Politics in Contemporary China (Seattle: University of Washington Press, 1973), pp. 47–77Google Scholar. Also discussed in Wakeman, “The use and abuse of ideology.”

76. Wakeman, , “The use and abuse of ideology,” p. 136Google Scholar, in discussing Schurmann, H. Franz, Ideology and Organization (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1968), p. 58.Google Scholar

77. Hsüeh-hsi yü p'i-p'an (Study and Criticism), No. 4 (12 1973), pp. 94–95.Google Scholar