Hostname: page-component-84b7d79bbc-fnpn6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-27T20:03:27.616Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Moscow's China-watchers in the Post-Mao Era: The Response to a Changing China

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  17 February 2009

Gilbert Rozman
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

The year 1982 was marked by repeated signs of Soviet interest in improving relations with China. Negotiations to chart a new course in the relationship between these two countries finally began in October. While the fate of these negotiations remained uncertain at the time this article was being written, the onus was largely on the Soviet leaders to show that they were capable of the sort of flexibility that the Nixon Republicans had demonstrated barely a decade earlier in wooing the Chinese. The Sino-Soviet talks provided a test of Soviet tolerance for diversity in international communism and of willingness to take tangible steps towards demilitarization. They also raised questions about the internal process of evaluating conditions in other countries, reporting on them to the Soviet people, and advising leaders on their significance. After 20 years of negative assessments of communist policies in China, what basis could be found for an optimistic outlook in 1982? In the six years after Mao's death what was the role of Moscow's China-watchers in preparing the way for overtures to China's leaders? This article examines the background behind the Soviet initiative of 1982 and the different outlooks found among China specialists.

Type
Research Article
Information
The China Quarterly , Volume 94 , June 1983 , pp. 215 - 241
Copyright
Copyright © The China Quarterly 1983

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. The Current Digest of the Soviet Press, Vol. 33, No. 8 (25 03 1981), p. 7Google Scholar;

2. Ibid. Vol. 34, No. 12 (21 April 1982), p. 6.

3. Ibid. Vol. 34, No. 21 (23 June 1982), p. 23.

4. Ibid. Vol. 34, No. 39 (27 October 1982), p. 2.

5. The New York Times, 28 October 1982, Sect. A, pp. 1 and 6.

6. The Current Digest of the Soviet Press, Vol. 34, No. 47 (22 12 1982), p. 6Google Scholar;

7. Kapitsa, M. S. [Ukraintsev, M. S.] (a name in square brackets refers to the pseudonym used by the writer), “Sovetsko-kitaiskie otnosheniia: problemy i perspektivy” (“Soviet-Chinese relations: problems and perspectives”), Problemy Dal'nego Vostoka, No. 2 (1982), pp. 22–24Google Scholar;

8. An exchange of materials that are not available for public sale occurs through the auspices of the U.S.–U.S.S.R. Binational Commission in the Humanities and Social Sciences, administered in the U.S. by the International Research and Exchanges Board. In return for papers from conferences on China supported by the American Council of Learned Societies and the Social Science Research Council, New York, the American side receives collections of conference papers on pre-modern China including the annual three-volume set of papers from the conference, “Obshchestvo i gosudarstvo v Kitae” (“Society and State in China”), and the latest bibliographies of Soviet publications on China.

9. The host for my visits was the Institute of Oriental Studies, Academy of Sciences and, within it, the Department of China, whose director is L. P. Deliusin. Most of the staff in this department specialize on China prior to 1949. Meetings were arranged with researchers on pre-modern and contemporary China at other institutes and universities.

10. Kitaiskaia Narodnaia Respublika: Ukazatel' literatury na russkom iazyke, opublikovannoi v 1979 godu (People's Republic of China: Index of Literature in Russian Published in 1979), 2 vols. (Moscow: Institut Dal'nego Vostoka, Institut Nauchnoi Informatsii po Obshchestvennym Naukam, sinologicheskii otdel, 1981)Google Scholar;

11. Elsewhere Soviet studies of Chinese history and literature are examined separately by 10 American specialists on China who know Russian. See Rozman, Gilbert (ed.), Soviet Studies of Premodern China: Assessments of Recent Scholarship (Ann Arbor: Michigan Publications on East AsiaCrossRefGoogle Scholar; forthcoming).

12. Knigi i slat'i o Kitae na russkom iazyke, opublikovannye v 1976 g. (Books and Articles on China Published in 1976) (Moscow: Institut Dal'nego Vostoka, Institut Nauchnoi Informatsii po Obshchestvennym Naukam, sinologicheskii otdel, 1978)Google Scholar and Kitaiskaia Narodnaia Respublika: Ukazatel' literatury na russkom iazyke, opublikovannoi v 1977godu (People's Republic of China: Index of Literature in Russian Published in 1977) (Moscow: Institut Dal'nego Vostoka, Institut Nauchnoi Informatsii po Obshchestvennym Naukam, sinologicheskii otdel, 1979)Google Scholar; both of which were prepared by V. P. Zhuravleva in the sinological divisions of the Institute of the Far East and the Institute for Scientific Information in the Social Sciences.

13. Information on degree recipients has been obtained from card catalogues in Soviet libraries, the Institute for Scientific Information in the Social Sciences, and the Institute of the Far East. Some other organizational data have not been divulged to me. Both in 1978 and 1982 the Institute of the Far East refused to provide a list of departments and sectors together with the names of their heads.

14. Kitaiskaia Narodnaia Respubtika v 1973 (–1979) godu: politika, ekonomika, ideologiia (People's Republic of China in 1973 (–1979): policies, economics, ideology) (Moscow: Nauka, 1975–1981)Google Scholar;

15. Tikhvinsky, S. L., “Fal'sifikatory istorii v KNR,” Knizhnoe obozrenie. No. 30 (29 07 1977), p. 5Google Scholar;

16. Sladkovsky, M. I., “Tsel' Pekina: militarizatsiia strany,” Zaria Vostoka, 7 07 1977Google Scholar;

17. Kapitsa, M. S., “Bor'ba SSSR za mir i sotrudnichestvo v Azii,” Problemy Dal'nego Vostoka, No. 1 (1979), pp. 31–55Google Scholar;

18. Rakhmanin, O. B. [Borisov, O. B.', Sovetskii Soiuz i Man'chzhurskaia revoliutsionnaia baza, 1945–1949. Revised 2nd edit. (Moscow: Mysl', 1977)Google Scholar;

19. Rakhmanin, O. B. [Borisov, O. B.] and Kulik, S. [Koloskov, B. T.], K 30-letiiu KNR: pobedy, porazheniia, uroki (Moscow: Znanie, 1979)Google Scholar;

20. Sladkovsky, M. I., Kitai: osnovnye problemy istorii ekonomiki ideologii (Moscow: Mysl', 1978)Google Scholar;

21. Kapitsa, M. S., KNR: tri desiatiletiia-tri politiki (Moscow: Politizdat, 1979)Google Scholar;

22. Rakhmanin, O. B. [Borisov, O. B.], Vnutrennaia i vneshniaia politika Kitaia v 70-e gody (Moscow: Politizdat, 1982)Google Scholar;

23. Translations of Soviet writings on China into English are too numerous to list in full. In 1979 alone there were 10 books published by Progress or Novosti. Among the more substantial or controversial writings in recent years mention should be made of: Apalin, G. and Mityayev, I., Militarism in Peking's Policies (Progress, 1980)Google Scholar; Rakhmanin, O. B. [Borisov, O. B.], The Soviet Union and the Manchurian Revolutionary Base (1945–1949) (Progress, 1977)Google Scholar; Rakhmanin, O. B. [Borisov, O. B.] and Koloskov, B. T., Soviet-Chinese Relations 1945–1973 (Progress, 1975)Google Scholar; Burlatsky, Fedor, Mao Tse-tung: An Ideological and Psychological Portrait (Progress, 1980)Google Scholar; Gudoshnikov, L. M. and Neronov, R. M., China After Mao (Novosti, 1979)Google Scholar; Henry, Ernst, What Are They After in Peking (Progress, 1979)Google Scholar; Maoism As It Really Is (Progress, 1981); and Sladkovsky, M. I., The Long Road: Sino-Russian Economic Contacts From Ancient Times to 1917 (Progress. 1981)Google Scholar;

24. Opasnyi kurs, Nos. 8–11 (Moscow: Politizdat, 1978–1981)Google Scholar;

25. Pravda, 5 April 1979; translated in The Current Digest of the Soviet Press, Vol. 31, No. 14 (2 05 1979), pp. 1–4Google Scholar;

26. Kapitsa, KNR: tri desiatiletiia-tri poliliki.

27. Sladkovsky, Kitai: osnovnye problemy istorii ekonomiki ideologii.

28. Rakhmanin [O. B. Borisov], Vnutrennaia i vneshniaia politika Kitaia v 70-e gody.

29. Rakhmanin, O. B. [Borisov, O. B.], “Polozhenie v KNR i nekotorye zadachi sovetskogo kitaevedeniia” (“The situation in the PRC and some problems of Soviet China studies”), Problemy Dal'nego Vostoka, No. 2 (1982), pp. 3–14Google Scholar;

30. Rakhmanin [O. B. Borisov], “Polozhenie v KNR i nekotorye zadachi sovetskogo kitaevedeniia.”

31. Rothenburg, Morris, Whither China: The View from the Kremlin (Miami: Center for Advanced International Studies, University of Miami, 1977)Google Scholar;

32. Sandles, Gretchen Ann, “Soviet images of the People's Republic of China, 1949–1979,” Ph.D. dissertation, University of Michigan, 1981Google Scholar;

33. Burlatsky, Fedor, “Nasledniki Mao” (“Mao's heirs “), Novyi mir, No. 9 (1978), pp. 217–42Google Scholar;

34. Gel'bras, V. G., Sotsial'no-politicheskaia struktura KNR 50-60-e gody (Moscow: Nauka, 1980)Google Scholar;

35. Ibid. p. 5.

36. Gosudarstvo i obshchestvo v kitae (State and Society in China) (Moscow: Nauka, 1978), p. 3Google Scholar;

37. Deliusin, L. P., “Tao Sishen o kharaktere i evoliutsii kitaiskogo obshchestva” (“Tao Xisheng on the character and evolution of Chinese society”), Obshchestvo i gosudarstvo v Kitae, Vol. 12, No. 3 (1981), p. 12Google Scholar;

38. Gel'bras, , Sotsial'no-politicheskaia struktura KNR 50-60-e gody, p. 20Google Scholar;

39. Meliksetov, A. V., Sotsial'no-ekonomicheskaia politika Gomin'dana 1927–1949gg. (The Socio-economic Policies of the Kuomintang 1927–1949) (Moscow: Nauka, 1977), p. 25Google Scholar;

40. Gel'bras, , Sotsial'no-politicheskaia struktura KNR 50-60-e gody, pp. 22–23Google Scholar;

41. The titles of these booklets is as follows: Intelligentsiia: mesto v obshchestve i politika rukovodstva KPK (The Intelligentsia: Place in Society and Policies of the Leadership of the CCP); Problemy: protivorechiia v razvitii rabochego klassa KNR (Problems and Contradictions in the Development of the Working Class of the PRQ; Rabochii klass i polozhenie v profsoiuzakh KNR (The Working Class and the Situation in the Unions of the PRQ; Sotsial'nye problemy kitaiskogo obshchestva (Social Problems of Chinese Society); and Sotsiologiia politiki: problemy issledovaniia (The Sociology of Policies: Problems and Research); all of which were published by the Institut Mezhdunarodnogo Rabochego Dvizheniia AN SSSR, Moscow, in 1978.

42. Deliusin, L. P., “Sud'by intelligentsii v Kitae” (“The fates of the intelligentsia in China”), Intelligentsiia: mesto v obshchestve i politika rukovodstva KPK (The Intelligentsia: Place in Society and Policies of the Leadership of the CCP) (Moscow: Institut Mezhdunarodnogo Rabochego Dvizheniia AN SSSR, 1978), p. 22Google Scholar;

43. Nikitina, T. I., “Burzhuaznye sinologi o traditsionnom i novom v strukture i funktsiiakh kitaiskoi sem'i” (“Bourgeois sinologists on the traditional and modern in the structure and functions of the Chinese family”), Sotsial'nye problemy kitaiskogo obshchestva (Social Problems of Chinese Society) (Moscow: Institut Mezhdunarodnogo Rabochego Dvizheniia AN SSSR, 1978)Google Scholar;

44. Burlatsky, , Mao Tse-tung, pp. 359–61Google Scholar;

45. Burlatsky, Fedor, “Mezhdutsarstvie ili khronika vremen Den Siaopina” (“The Interregnum or a chronicle of the times of Deng Xiaoping”), Novyimir, No. 4 (1982), pp. 205–228Google Scholar;

46. Rabochii Mass v sotsial'no-politicheskoi sisteme KNR (The Working Class in the Socio-political System of the PRC) (Moscow: Nauka, 1981)Google Scholar;

47. Kapitsa, [Ukraintsev, M. S.], “Sovetsko-kitaiskie otnosheniia: problemy i perspektivy” (“Soviet-Chinese relations: problems and perspectives”), pp. 15–24Google Scholar;

48. O. B. Rakhmanin [O. B. Borisov], “ Polozhenie v KNR i nekotorye zadachi sovetskogo kitaevedeniia.”