Hostname: page-component-68945f75b7-mktnf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-09-02T12:18:16.152Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A Reply to the Kremlinologists

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  17 February 2009

Michael Yahuda
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Comment
Information
The China Quarterly , Volume 51 , July 1972 , pp. 547 - 553
Copyright
Copyright © The China Quarterly 1972

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Michael, Yahuda, “Kremlinology and the Chinese Strategic Debate, 1965–66.” The China Quarterly, No. 49 (01–03 1972), pp. 32–75. The replies were published in No. 50 (April–June 1972), pp. 343–50.Google Scholar

2. Uri, Ra'anan, “Peking's Foreign Policy ‘Debate’, 1965–1966,” pp. 23–71; Donald S. Zagoria, “The Strategic Debate in Peking,” pp. 237–68. Both in Tang, Tsou (ed.) China in Crisis, Vol. 2 (University of Chicago Press, 1968).Google ScholarZagoria, Donald S., Vietnam Triangle (Pegasus N.Y., 1967).Google Scholar

3. See for example, Ionescu, G., Communism in Rumania 1944–1962 (London: Oxford University Press, 1964), p. 316Google Scholar, or David, Floyd, Rumania; Russia's Dissident Ally (London and N.Y., 1965), pp. 72–75Google Scholar, or Ulam, Adam B., Expansion and Coexistence (London: Secker and Warburg, 1968), pp. 711–14.Google Scholar

4. John, Gittings, Survey of the Sino-Soviet DisputeGoogle Scholar, Griffith, W. E., Sino-Soviet Relations, 1964–1965.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

5. Yahuda, , p. 74, for detailed analysis, see also pp. 66–7 and p. 59.Google Scholar

6. , Zagoria, Vietnam Triangle, pp. 67–8.Google Scholar