Hostname: page-component-84b7d79bbc-g7rbq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-27T12:45:23.061Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Reassessing the Evidence of Chinese “Character Amnesia”

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 November 2018

Guy Almog
Guy Almog*
Affiliation:
University of Haifa. Email: Almoguy@gmail.com.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Increasing numbers of Chinese and Japanese speakers have been reporting that their ability to handwrite Chinese characters has been steadily diminishing, a phenomenon which is most likely a result of the growing reliance upon digital technologies. This so-called “character amnesia” has recently attracted a great deal of concern from a large number of observers, especially within the People's Republic of China. Unsurprisingly, many of the concerned participants involved in the discourse on this issue tend to rely on various empirical means in order to illustrate why they consider “character amnesia” such a worrying phenomenon. This article argues, however, that the bulk of this empirical support is unreliable and/or invalid. The article also suggests possible amendments which could hopefully lead to a better understanding of this important subject.

摘要

愈来愈多的说汉语与说日语的人发现, 他们手写汉字的能力一直在持续下降。该现象最有可能的起因是对数字技术日益依赖。这种所谓的 “提笔忘字” 最近引起了广大观察者的强烈担忧, 特别是在中华人民共和国。并不意外的是, 为了解释说明为何 “提笔忘字” 被认为是一种令人担忧的现象, 许多涉及这个话题的参与者们都倾向于依靠各种经验手段来解释。然而本文认为, 这些依靠经验方法支持的大部分是不可靠或无效的。因此本文提出了有可能性的修正, 希望能够更好地理解该重要主题。

Keywords

China“character amnesia”Chinese charactershandwritingInput Method Editors (IMEs)validity and reliability中国提笔忘字汉字手写输入法 (IMEs)效度与信度
Type
Research Report
Information
The China Quarterly , Volume 238 , June 2019 , pp. 524 - 533
Copyright
Copyright © SOAS University of London 2018 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Almog, Guy. 2018. “Getting out of hand? Examining the discourse of ‘character amnesia’.” Modern Asian Studies, 1–28. doi: 10.1017/S0026749X1700035X.Google Scholar
Bains, Gurnek. 2015. Cultural DNA: The Psychology of Globalization. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
Carmines, Edward G., and Zeller, Richard A.. 1979. Reliability and Validity Assessment. London: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
Coulmas, Florian. 1994. “Writing systems and literacy: the alphabet myth revisited.” In Verhoeven, Ludo (ed.), Functional Literacy: Theoretical Issues and Educational Implications. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 305–320.Google Scholar
Du, Yangyang, and Zhang, Wenjing. 2013. “‘Tibiwangzi’ cheng tongbing hanzi shuxie weiji gai ruhe pojie” (“Character amnesia” becomes a common problem: how should the Chinese character crisis be explained?). Shenghuo jiaoyu 11, 5–8.Google Scholar
Feng, Weijuan. 2014. “Xinxihua shidai hanzi shuxie shoudao de chongji ji duice” (The impact and strategy of Chinese character writing in the information age). Ke jiaodao kan 9, 62–63.Google Scholar
Hu, Yingnong. 2014. “Cong ‘hanzi shuxie weiji’ kan yuwen jichujiaoyu de queshi” (The lack of Chinese basic education from the perspective of “Chinese character writing crisis”). Jiaoyu yu jiaoxue yanjiu 28(11), 94–97. doi: 10.13627/j.cnki.cdjy.2014.11.023.Google Scholar
Lan, Shiqiu. 2013. “‘Tibiwangzi’ women jiujing wangdiaole shenma? (“Character amnesia”: what did we forget after all?), Chongqing ribao, 4 November.Google Scholar
Li, Duruo. 2015. “Wenhua zongyi lei dianshi jiemu de chuangxin yu niepan – yi ‘hanzi yingxiong’ jiemu wei lei” (On the innovation and reinvigoration of television: programmes featuring Chinese culture and variety arts). Nanyang shifan xueyuan xuebao 14(2), 56–58.Google Scholar
Liu, Jingwen. 2015. “A heated discussion on the ‘crisis in writing Chinese characters’.” In Yuming, Li and Wei, Li (eds.), The Language Situation in China. Vol. 3. Beijing: Walter de Gruyter, 201–210.Google Scholar
Peng, Zhiqiong. 2016. “Tibiwangzi xianxiang de xinli yanjiu” (Psychological elements of character amnesia). Sichuan wenli xueyuan xuebao 26(5), 66–68.Google Scholar
Shao, Lanzhu. 2015. “Shi lun ‘tibiwangzi’” (On “character amnesia”). Dazhong wenyi 10, 273.Google Scholar
Shu, Mingzhi. 2015. “Weishidai xia hanzi shuxie yu guifan duice yanjiu” (Research on Chinese character writing and its standardization measures in the micro age). Meishu jiaoyu yanjiu 21, 51–52.Google Scholar
Taylor, Insup, and Taylor, Martin M.. 1995. Writing and Literacy in Chinese, Korean and Japanese. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Xiong, Xin. 2014. “Lun shufa jiaoyu zai dangqian woguo jichujiaoyu ji daxue fei shufa zhuanye zhong de shiming guanli shi yu” (On the mission management perspective of calligraphy education in present China's basic education and college non-calligraphic majors). Gansu gao shi xuebao 19(1), 96–101.Google Scholar
Yan, Chunbo. 2015. “Dui ‘tibiwangzi’ de hanzi wenhua weiji xianzhuang de sikao” (Reflections on the current situation of the cultural crisis of “character amnesia”). Kecheng jiaoyu yanjiu 8, 38–39.Google Scholar
Zheng, Shangbiao. 2014. “Cong gaoxiao guanli shijue weidu tan ‘hanzi weiji’” (Discussion on the “crisis of Chinese characters” from the perspective of higher education management). Heihe xue kan 199(2), 141–142. doi:10.14054/j.cnki.cn23-1120/c.2014.02.056.Google Scholar