Hostname: page-component-5c6d5d7d68-lvtdw Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-08-16T05:27:42.576Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Anabaptists and the Civil Authorities of Strasbourg, 1525–1555*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 July 2009

Robert Kreider
Robert Kreider
Affiliation:
Bluffton College
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Since the dawn of the Christian era the relationship between church and state has been one of the pivotal issues of western civilization. Men have offered a variety of answers to this problem. The much- persecuted Anabaptists of the 16th century presented one set of answers, radical for their age, which called for a decisive separation of the church from the state and complete freedom for the church to pursue its vocation in the world. The Anabaptists were a distressing annoyance to the civil authorities. This movement posed for the 16th century the acute problem: how should religious dissent be handled?

Type
Research Article
Information
Church History , Volume 24 , Issue 2 , June 1955 , pp. 99 - 118
Copyright
Copyright © American Society of Church History 1955

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Crämer, Ulrich, Die Verfassung und Verwaltung Strassburgs von der Reformat ionszeit bis. zum Fall der Reichsstadt (Frankfurt a.M.: Elsass-Lothringen Institut, 1931), p.196.Google Scholar

2. Rathgeber, Julius, Strassburg im sechszehnten Jahrhundert (Stuttgart: J. F. Steinkopf, 1871), pp. 6–7.Google Scholar

3. Bellardi, Werner, Die Geschichte der “Christlichen Gemeinschaft” in Strassburg (1546–1550), Vol. XVIII of Quellen und Forschungen zur Reformationsgeschichte (Leipzig: M. Heinsius Nachfolger, 1934), p. 10.Google Scholar

4. Gerbert, Camill, Geschichte der Strassburger Sektenbewegung zur Zeit der Reformation (Strasbourg: Heitz und Mündel, 1889), p. xii.Google Scholar

5. Ibid., p. x.

6. Baum, Adolf, Magistrat und Reformation in Strassburg bis 1529 (Strasbourg: J. H. Ed. Heitz, 1887), pp. 7–8.Google Scholar

7. Gerbert, op. cit., pp. viii-ix.

8. Anrich, Gustav, “Strassburg und die Calvinische Kirchenverfassung,” Re- den bei der Rektoratsübergabe am S. Mai 1928 im FestsaaL der Universität, No. 25 of University of Täbingen (Tübingen: J. C. B. MohrGoogle Scholar[Siebeck, Paul], 1928), p. 18.Google Scholar

9. Cf. Pauck, Wilhelm, The Heritage of the Reformation (Boston: Beacon Press, 1950), p. 89.Google Scholar

10. Horsch, John, Infant Baptism (Scottdale, Pa.: published by author, 1917), pp. 24–26, 94–95.Google Scholar

11. Anrich, Gustav, Martin Bucer (Strasbourg: Karl J. Trübner, 1914), p. 37.Google Scholar

12. Baum, op. cit., pp. 94–96.

13. Ibid., pp.186–87.

14. Cramer, op cit., p.186.

15. Baum, Johann W., Capito und Butzer (Elberfeld: R. T. Friderichs, 1860), p. 371.Google Scholar

16. For a discussion of the prolonged resistance of the magistracy to the introduction of church discipline see Bellardi, op. cit., pp.16–25.

17. For an account of Jacob Sturm's unsuccessful effort to postpone the abolition of the mass in Strasbourg until after the Diet of Speyer see Adolf Baum, op. cit., pp.186–87.

18. Röhrich, Timoth. Wilh., “Zur Geschichte der strassburgischen Wiedertäufer in den Jahren 1527 bis 1543,” Zeit.schrift für die historische Theologie, XXX (1860), p.79.Google Scholar

19. Cornelius, C. A., Die Wiedertanfe, Vol. II of Geschichte des Münsterischen Aufruhrs (Leipzig: T. D. Weigel, 1860), II, 273.Google Scholar

20. Gerbert, op. cit., p.16.

21. Zürich, Vol. I of Quellen zur Gesehichte der Täufer in der Schweiz, eds. Leonhard von Muralt and Walter Schmid (Zurich: S. Hirzel, 1952), No. 107.Google Scholar

22. Gerbert, op. cit., p. 16.

23. Ibid., p. 17.

24. Cornelius, , op. cit., II, 273.Google Scholar

25. Capito to Zwingli, Strasbourg, September 26, 1526, Huldreich Zwinglis samtliche Werke, ed. E. Egli et al., VIII (Vol. XCX of Corpus Reformatorurn [Leipzig: M. Heinsius Nachfolger, 1936] ), 725Google Scholar (hereafter cited as ZW with the volume number of the Werke rather than of the Corpus Reftrrnatorurn).

26. Capito, to Strasbourg, Zwingli, 12 10, 1526, ZW, VIII, 800.Google Scholar cf. Butzer, to Strasbourg, Farel, in Herminjard, A. L., Correspondance de8 Reformateurs (Geneva: H. Georg, 1878), I, 467.Google Scholar

27. Capito, to Strasbourg, Zwingli, 12 26, 1526, ZW, VIII, 819–20.Google Scholar

28. Neff, Christian, “Martin Butzer,” Mennonitisches LexilconM (ML), eds. Christian, Hege and Christian, Neff (Frankfurt am Main and Weierhof [Pfalz], 1913- ) I, 309.Google Scholar

29. Capito, to Strasbourg, Zwingli, 1226, 1526, ZW, VIII, 820.Google Scholar

30. Sebastian Pranck, “Chronica der Römischen Kätzer, Part 3 of Chronica, Zeyt buck und Geschioht8bibel (Strasbourg: Balthasar Beck, 1531), p. ccccxlixa.

31. Hulshof, A., Geschiedenis van de Doopsgezinden te Straatsburg van 1525 tot 1557 (Amsterdam: J. Clausen, 1905), pp. 66–67.Google Scholar

32. Copy of the letter in Röhrich, op cit., pp. 31–32.

33. Neff, , “Butzer,” ML, I, 309.Google Scholar

34. An abridged copy of Capito's letter is to be found in Baum, , Capito und Butzer, pp. 373–75.Google Scholar

35. Capito, to Strasbourg, Zwingli, 02 28, 1527, ZW, IX, 60.Google Scholar

36. Capito, to Strasbourg, Zwingli, 04 8, 1527, ZW, IX, 87–88Google Scholar; cf. Baum, , Capito und Butzer, p. 372.Google Scholar

37. Copy of the mandate in Röhrieh, op. cit., pp. 33–34.

38. Ibid., p. 4.

39. Baum, , Capito und Butzer, p. 592.Google Scholar

40. Capito, to Strasbourg, Zwingli, 11 7, 1527, ZW, IX, 299–300.Google Scholar

41. Butzer to A. Blaurer, Strasbourg, September 13, 1528, in Cornelius, op. cit., II, 260.

42. Röhrich, op. cit., pp. 18–19.

43. For a copy of the letter see Ibid., pp. 42–43.

44. Butzer to A. Blaurer, Strasbourg, February 8, 1528, cited by Gerbert, op. cit., p. 56.

45. Röhrich, op. cit., p. 36, f. 47.

46. Butzer, to Strasbourg, Zwingli, 06 24, 1528, ZW, IX, 492.Google Scholar

47. Gerbert, op. cit., p. 63.

48. Ibid.

49. Cornelius, op. cit., II, 271.

50. Röhrich, op cit., p. 48.

51. Adam, D. Johann, Evangelische Kirchengeschichte der Stadt Strassburg bis zur Franzoesischen Revolution (Strasbourg: J. H. Ed. Heitz, 1922), p. 122.Google Scholar

52. Horsch, John, “Strasburg, A Swiss Brethren Center,” Mennonite Quarterly Review, XIII (01, 1939), 23.Google Scholar

53. Adam, op. cit., p. 177.

54. Gerbert, op. cit., p. 97.

55. Cornelius, op. cit., II, 276.

56. Bellardi, op. cit., p. 17.

57. Neff, , “Capito,” ML, I, 332.Google Scholar

58. Paulus, Nicolaus, Die Strassburger Reformatoren und die Gewissensfreiheit, Vol. II of Strassburger Theologische Studien (Strasbourg: B. Herder, 1895), pp. 28–46.Google Scholar

59. Gerbert, op. cit., p. 97.

60. Cornelius, op. cit., II, 85.

61. Gerbert, op. cit., p. 97.

62. Ibid., pp. 99–100.

63. Ibid., pp. 100–101.

64. Copy of the ruling in Röhrich, op. cit., p. 53.

65. Ibid., p. 53.

66. For a record of the disputation see Ibid., pp. 53–55.

67. Ibid., p. 55.

68. For a copy of the order banishing Marpeck see Ibid., p. 56.

69. Neff, , “Butzer,” ML, I, 311.Google Scholar

70. Wenger, J. C., “The Life and Work of Pilgram Marpeck,” Mennonite Quarterly Review, XII (07, 1938), 153.Google Scholar

71. “Pilgram Marpeck's Confession of Faith Composed at Strasburg,” transcribed and edited from the original by J. C. Wenger, Mennonite Quarterly Review, XII (07, 1938), 167–202.Google Scholar

72. Ibid., 171.

73. Copy of the letter in Röhrich, op. cit., pp. 57–58.

74. Adam, op. cit., p. 205.

75. Neff, , “Butzer,” ML, I, 311.Google Scholar

76. Gerbert, op. cit., pp. 180–81.

77. Neff, , “Melchior Hofmann,” ML, II, 332–33.Google Scholar

78. Gerbert, op. cit., p. 181.

79. Adam, op. cit., p. 208.

80. Horsch, “Strasburg …,” op. cit., p. 23.

81. Adam op. cit., p. 210.

82. Gerbert, op. cit., p. 56.

83. Butzer to Blaurer, Strasbourg, September 23, 1533, cited by Neff, , “Butzer,” ML, I, 312.Google Scholar

84. Hulshof, op. cit., p. 247. For an English translation see Bender, Harold S., “The Anabaptists and Religious Liberty in the 16th Century,” Archiv für Reforrnatioasgeschichte, XLIV (1953), 40–41.Google Scholar

85. Copy of the mandate in Röhrich, op. cit., pp. 106–109.

86. Wiedertäufercrkten, 1527–1626, Vol. IV of Urkundliche Quellen var hessischen Reformationsgeschichte, Division XI of Veröffentlichung der Historisceh en Kommission för Hessen und Waldek, ed. by W. Köhler, W. Sohm, T. Sippell, and G. Franz (Marburg: N. G. Elwert'sche Verlagsbuchhandlung, 1951), pp. 123–28.Google Scholar

87. Copy of the mandate in Röhrich, op. cit., pp. 109–112.

88. For a copy of the special oath see Ibid., pp. 113–14.

89. For a copy of the mandate see Ibid., pp. 118–19.

90. Paulus, op. cit., pp. 25–26.

91. Ibid., p. 25.

92. Adam, op. cit., p. 214.

93. Ibid., p. 215.

94. Correll, Ernst, “Elsass,” ML, I, 553.Google Scholar

95. Hulshof, op. cit., p. 159.

96. Rocholl, Heinrich, Anfänge der Reformation in Colmar (Colmar: Land and Rasch, 1875), p. 64.Google Scholar

97. Röhrich, Timotheus W., Geschichte der Reformation in Elaass and beonders Strassburg (Strasbourg: Friedrich Carl Heitz, 1832), II, 254.Google Scholar

98. Correll, , “Elsass,” ML, I, 553.Google Scholar

99. Ibid.

100. Ibid., p. 554.

101. Franck, op. cit., p. ccccxiiib.

102. Copy of the German text and English translation in Bender, H. S., “The Discipline Adopted by the Strasburg Conference of 1568,” Mennonite Quarterly Review, I (01, 1927), 57–66.Google Scholar

103. Adam, op. cit., p. 214.

104. Cited by Horsch, “Strasburg …,” op. cit., p. 27.

105. Sohm, Walter, Die Schule Johann Sturms and die Kirche Strassburgs ihrem gegenseitigen Verhältnis 1530–1581 (Munich: R. Oldenbourg, 1912), pp. 133–36.Google Scholar

106. Bellardi, op. cit., pp. 16–24.

107. Ibid., pp. 24–25, 38 ff.