12th August 2024: digital purchasing is currently unavailable on Cambridge Core. Due to recent technical disruption affecting our publishing operation, we are experiencing some delays to publication. We are working hard to restore services as soon as possible and apologise for the inconvenience. For further updates please visit our website: https://www.cambridge.org/news-and-insights/technical-incident
We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 28 July 2009
It is not surprising that the sixteenth century Anabaptist movement should gain increasing attention among American church historians. Anyone who becomes even slightly acquainted with that movement cannot help but observe that many of its features, such as its individualism, its rejection of infant baptism, its subjectivism, and its fragmentation into many diverse groups, seem to anticipate the kind of ecclesiastical developments that characterize much of North American church history. The parallel even extends to a number of individual phenomena: Many modern premillennialist movements hold views remarkably like those of Melchior Hoffman. The efforts of Jan de Bakker and Jan Beukelzoon to set up a Kingdom of God at Miinster were very like those of Joseph Smith and Brigham Young, and the Latter Day Saints who followed them, to achieve a similar objective in the United States. In this case the parallel even extends to the polygamy that was introduced in both movements. Among the early Anabaptists Adam Pastor held beliefs which did not differ markedly from the anti-trinitarian doctrines of the present Jehovah's Witnesses. The existence of many such similarities makes the study of early Anabaptism a profitable one to the student of American church history.
1. Smit, J. W., “The Present Position of Studies Regarding the Revolt in the Netherlands,” in Bromley, J. S., and Kossmann, E. H., eds., Britain and the Netherlands, (London, 1960), p. 18.Google Scholar
2. Geyl, Pieter, Debates with Historians (New York, 1959, 1960), pp. 207–209.Google Scholar
3. Rogier, L. G., “De Protestantisering van het Noorden,” in Van Houtte, J. A., Niermeyer, J. F., Presser, J., Romein, J., and Van Werveke, H., eds., Algemeene Gesehiedenis der Nederlanden, Deel V., (Utrecht, Antwerpen, Brussel, Gent en Leuven, 1952), pp. 327, 328, 333, 343, 345, 350.Google Scholar
4. Reitsma, J. and Van Veen, S. P., eds., Acta der Provinciale en Particuliere Synoden Gehouden in de Noordelijke Nederlanden Gedurende de Jaren 1572–1620, 8 volumes (Groningen, 1892-1901).Google Scholar This work will henceforth be referred to simply as Acta.
5. Rogier, p. 438.
6. Psalter Hymnal Doctrinal Standards and Liturgy of the Christian Reformed Church (Grand Rapids, 1959), Appendix p. 19,Google Scholar footnote (containing the old reading).
7. Acta, I, 39.Google Scholar
8. Wessel, J. H., De Leerstellige Strijd tusschea Nederlandsche Gereforneerden en Doopsgezinden in de Zestiende Eeuw (Assen, 1945), pp. 292, 293.Google Scholar
9. Acta, I, 135, 209, 210.Google Scholar
10. Acta, I, 215, 219.Google Scholar
11. Acta, I, 283, 292.Google Scholar
12. Acta, I, 335, 341.Google Scholar
13. Acta, I, 348Google Scholar.
14. Acta, III, Preface, p. viii.Google Scholar
15. Acta, II, 30, 31.Google Scholar
16. Acta, II, 146.Google Scholar
17. Acta, II, 197.Google Scholar
18. Acta, II, 335.Google Scholar
19. Acta, II, 399.Google Scholar
20. Acta, II, 439.Google Scholar
21. Acta, III, 48.Google Scholar
22. Acta, III, 49.Google Scholar
23. Acta, III, 88, 108, 127.Google Scholar
24. Acta, III, 201.Google Scholar
25. Acta, III, 214.Google Scholar
26. Acta, III, 394.Google Scholar
27. Acta, III, 446.Google Scholar
28. Acta, III, 450.Google Scholar
29. Acta, IV, 2.Google Scholar
30. Acta, IV, 6.Google Scholar
31. Acta, IV, 38, 49.Google Scholar
32. Acta, V, Preface, p. vii.Google Scholar
33. Acta, V, 149, 152.Google Scholar
34. Acta, V, 236, 245, 248.Google Scholar
35. Acta, V, 270.Google Scholar
36. Acta, V, 292.Google Scholar
37. Acta, V, 310.Google Scholar
38. Acta, V, 354.Google Scholar
39. Acta, VI, 23, 26.Google Scholar
40. Acta, VI, 33, 34, 91, 100, 105, 134, 141, 174, 189.Google Scholar
41. Acta, VI, 33, 34.Google Scholar
42. Acta, VI, 82.Google Scholar
43. Acta, VI, 87.Google Scholar
44. Acta, VI, 92.Google Scholar
45. Acta, VI, 97, 100, 105, 116.Google Scholar
46. Acta, VI, 123.Google Scholar
47. Kuhler, W. J., De Gesehiedenis der Nederlandseh Doopsgezinden in de Zestiende Ecuw, (Haarlem, 1932), p. 445.Google Scholar
48. Acta, VI, 91, 92.Google Scholar
49. Acta, VI, 123.Google Scholar
50. Acta, VI, 141, 142.Google Scholar
51. Acta, VI, 182, 189.Google Scholar
52. Acta, VI, 148, 149.Google Scholar
53. Acta, VI, 219.Google Scholar
54. Acta, VI, 276, 28.Google Scholar
55. Acta, VI, Preface, p. x.Google Scholar
56. Acta, VI, 305, 309.Google Scholar
57. Acta, VII, Preface, pp. v, vi.Google Scholar
58. Acta, VII, 4.Google Scholar
59. Acta, VII, 10.Google Scholar
60. Acta, VII, 14, 15, 16.Google Scholar
61. Acta, VII, 29, 31, 36, 43, 58, 83, 101, 111, 158, 173, 191, 204, 226, 233, 268, 276, 295, 304, 309, 316, 327, 343, 366, 368, 379, 380, 384, 389.Google Scholar
62. Acta, VII, 58.Google Scholar
63. Acta, VII, 83.Google Scholar
64. Acta, VII, 101.Google Scholar
65. Acta, VII, 111.Google Scholar
66. Acta, VII, 158, 164.Google Scholar
67. Acta, VII, 173.Google Scholar
68. Acta, VII, 233, 241.Google Scholar
69. Acta, VII, 268.Google Scholar
70. Acta, VII, 276.Google Scholar
71. Acta, VII, 295, 304, 309, 316.Google Scholar
72. Acta, VII, 327.Google Scholar
73. Acta, VII, 58, 111.Google Scholar
74. Acta, VII, 261, 262.Google Scholar
75. Acta, VII, 278, 288.Google Scholar
76. Acta, VII, 327, 366, 380.Google Scholar
77. Acta, VII, 53.Google Scholar
78. Acta, VII, 114.Google Scholar
79. Acta, VII, 193, 200.Google Scholar
80. Acta, VII, 213, 227.Google Scholar
81. Acta, VII, 242.Google Scholar
82. Acta, VII, 257.Google Scholar
83. Acta, VII, 276.Google Scholar
84. Kuhier, p. 446.
85. Acta, VIII, 90, 97, 98, 111.Google Scholar
86. Reitsma, J., Geschiedenis van de Hervorming en de Hervormde Kerk der Nederlanden (Groningen, 1899), p. 138.Google Scholar
87. Kuhler, p. 440.
88. Rogier, pp. 327, 340, 342.
89. Rogier, p. 333.
90. Geyl, p. 209.
91. Smit, pp. 11–28.
92. Rogier, pp. 326–342. Campare especially the single sentance on p. 326, “The expansion of Protestantism … is in origin the result of preaching and exposition, but very soon became a political concern” with the extensive discussion of Catholic missions on pp. 333–337.
When Rogier maintains that in this early period (1) very few people became Protestants and (2) those who did usually did so because of political or economic pressure, be may be shedding some light on the general political and social situation but he completely fails to account for the existence of the undeniably powerful religious movement we see revealed in the Acts of the Reformed Synods. Unless we focus some attention also on this factor we are left without an adequate explanation of “the Protestantization of the North.” Rogier pp. 326–350.
93. “Gewiss stand de Handlungweise des mittelalterlichen Menschen viclstarker unter religiosen Motiven als heutei” Koch, Paul, Der Einfluss des Calvinismus und des Mennonitentums auf die Niederrheinische Textilindustrie, (Krefeld, 1928), p. 70.Google Scholar
