Hostname: page-component-84b7d79bbc-g7rbq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-30T06:15:08.376Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The European Indian: Jesuit Civilization Planning in New France

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 July 2009

James P. Ronda
James P. Ronda
Affiliation:
Assistant professor of early American history in Youngstown State University, Ohio.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Europeans who came to America from the sixteenth century on, came not to discover a new world but to re-create their own versions of Europe. Whether Spanish conquistador or Virginia planter, each hoped to make America and native Americans into the shape of idealized Europes and Europeans. Of all those who made such plans, it was the Society of Jesus that had sufficient authority and manpower to put its visions into practice. Jesuits who came to New France in the 1630s brought not only Christianity but a whole complex of European social and political values. To examine Jesuit “civilization planning” in New France is to see in microcosm a significant part of early European-Indian relations.

Type
Research Article
Information
Church History , Volume 41 , Issue 3 , September 1972 , pp. 385 - 395
Copyright
Copyright © American Society of Church History 1972

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Thwaites, Ruben Goad, ed., The Jesuit Relations and Allied Documents Travels and Explorations of the Jesuit Missionaries in New France 1610–1791. 73 Vols. (Cleveland, Ohio, 1898–1901), 6 (1634), p. 147.Google Scholar Hereafter cited as JR.

2. JR., 1, (1610-1613), p. 173.Google Scholar

3. Gestarum, Relatio Rerum, JR, 2 (1612-1614), p. 201.Google Scholar

4. JR., 10 (1636), p. 213.Google Scholar

5. JR., 10 (1636), p. 211.Google Scholar

6. JR., 19 (1640), p. 39.Google Scholar

7. JR., 23 (1642-1643), p. 207.Google Scholar

8. JR., 23 (1642-1643), p. 223.Google Scholar

9. JR., 23 (1642-1643), pp. 211–213.Google Scholar

10. JR., 8 (1634-1636), pp. 143–147.Google Scholar

11. Beyond the obvious similarities in Jesuit mission techniques between New France and New Spain, there appears to be some evidence of continuity of approach stemming from efforts in the Philippines and China. For this evidence, see de la Costa, H., The Jesuits in the Philippines, 1581–1768 (Cambridge, 1961)CrossRefGoogle Scholar, Chapter 7; Dunne, George H., Generation of Giants, The Story of the Jesuits in China in the Last Decades of the Ming Dynasty (London, 1962);Google ScholarLatourette, Kenneth Scott, A History of Christian Missions in China (London, 1929), pp. 185–198.Google Scholar

12. JR., 11 (1636–1637), pp. 87–89.Google Scholar

13. Bailey, A. G., The Conflict of European and Eastern Algonkian Cultures, 1504–1700. 2nd. ed. (Toronto, 1969), 141;CrossRefGoogle ScholarPadden, R. C., The Humming Bird and The Hawk: Conquest and Sovereignty in the Valley of Mexico, 1503–1541 (Columbus, Ohio, 1967),Google Scholar Chapter 13; Spicer, Edward H., Cycles of Conquest: The Impact of Spain, Mexico, and the United States on the Indians of the Southwest, 1533–1960 (Tucson, 1962), 326.Google Scholar

14. JR., 13 (1642-1643), pp. 151–153.Google Scholar

15. JR., 23 (1642-1643), pp. 113–115.Google Scholar For a comparative perspective in New Spain, see Ricard, Robert, The Spiritual Conquest of Mexico: An Essay on the Apostolate and the Evangeliaing Methods of the Mendicant Orders in New Spain, 1513–1572 (Berkeley, 1933-1966).Google Scholar

16. JR., 66 (1702-1712), p. 235.Google Scholar In the Illinois country during 1712, Father Gabriel Marest was attacked by a“charlatan” who narrowly missed his skull with a hatchet. JR., 66 (1702-1712), p. 235.Google Scholar

17. JR., 6 (1633-1834), pp. 157–227;Google ScholarDunne, Peter M., Black Robes in Lower California (Berkeley, 1952), 16Google Scholar; Spicer, , Cycles of Conquest, 324–331.Google Scholar

18. JR., 25 (1642-1644), pp. 35–37.Google Scholar

19. JR., 7 (1634-1635), pp. 129–135.Google Scholar

20. JR., 6 (1633-1634), p. 149.Google Scholar

21. JR., 25 (1642-1644), p. 113.Google Scholar

22. JR., 16 (1639), p. 33.Google Scholar

23. JR., 8 (1634-1636), p. 15.Google Scholar

24. JR., 23 (1642-1643), p. 271.Google Scholar

25. JR., 9 (1639), p. 19.Google Scholar

26. B. G. Thwaites, “Introduction,” JR., 1 (1810-1613), pp. 18–19.Google Scholar

27. JR., 23 (1642-1643), p. 303.Google Scholar

28. Colbert to Talon, 5 April, 1667, as quoted in Jean Delanglez, Frontenac and the Jesuits (Chicago, 1939), 41.Google Scholar

29. JR., 53 (1669-1670), p. 205.Google Scholar

30. JR., 23 (1642-1643), p. 103.Google Scholar

31. JR., 53 (1669-1670), p. 207.Google Scholar

32. JR., 52 (1667-1669), p. 47.Google Scholar

33. JR., 6 (1633-1634), pp. 83–89.Google Scholar

34. JR., 12 (1637), pp. 39–45.Google Scholar

35. JR., 12 (1637), p. 61.Google Scholar

36. JR., 26 (1642-1644), p. 19.Google Scholar

37. This conflict is discussed in Delanglez, Frontenac and the Jesuits, 35 ff.

38. Few racial stereotypes are more persistent than that of the “Drunken Indian”. Jesuits adequately described the external effects of alcohol upon Indians and Indian society but failed to examine the specific reasons for the corrosive effects of alcoholism on traditional culture. Constant Jesuit concern for the problem actually helped lend weight to the stereotype. Jesuits and other Europeans did not sense that Indian culture, in terms of past experience and socialization, was not prepared to cope with the sudden invasion of alcohol and its social results. These ideas are partially developed in Craig Mac Andrew and Robert Edgerton, B., Drunken Comportment: A Social Explanation (Chieago, 1969), 136–164.Google Scholar

39. JR., 6 (1633-1634), p. 251.Google Scholar

40. JR., 11 (1636-1637), pp. 195–197.Google Scholar

41. JR., 28 (1645-1646), p. 31.Google Scholar

42. Delanglez, , Frontenac and the Jesuits, 72–73.Google Scholar

43. JR., 47 (1661-1663), p. 275.Google Scholar

44. JR., 47 (1661-1663), p. 297.Google Scholar

45. JR., 65 (1696-1702), pp. 191–195.Google Scholar

46. JR., 67 (1716-1727), pp. 39–45.Google Scholar

47. JR., 67 (1716-1727), p. 47.Google Scholar

48. Bailey, , Conflict, 135–141Google Scholar; JR., 50 (1664-1667), p. 287Google Scholar; JR., 65 (1702-1712), p. 181.Google Scholar For similar patterns in the Southwest, see Spicer, , Cycles of Conquest, 502–516.Google Scholar

49. Trigger, Bruce G., The Huron Farmers of the North (New York, 1969), 1–2.Google Scholar

50. JR., 25 (1642-1644), pp. 105–107.Google Scholar

51. JR., 25 (1642-1644), p. 37.Google Scholar