Last updated 09/07/24: Online ordering is currently unavailable due to technical issues. We apologise for any delays responding to customers while we resolve this. For further updates please visit our website: https://www.cambridge.org/news-and-insights/technical-incident
We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 28 July 2009
During the past forty years Canadian historians have viewed the relationship between religion and the development of Canadian society from three perspectives. None of these perspectives have risen out of the Canadian context; they have been imported and adapted with various degrees of success to the Canadian scene. The assistance they have given Canadian historians in perceiving and highlighting various aspects of the role of religion in their national life has been valuable. Like all perspectives, however, they have often concealed as much as they have revealed. Canadian church historians, of course, have been aware of the limitations which these perspectives have placed upon the story of the religious development of Canadian society. Their comments and criticisms, however, have never been systematically studied nor viewed in the wider context of the development of these perspectives elsewhere. This neglect needs to be remedied for such a study throws light not only on an aspect of the intellectual history of Canada but also on a number of points of emphasis in the use of these perspectives which appear to be distinctively Canadian. In what follows, therefore, an attempt has been made first of all to trace the development and continuing influence of these perspectives on the interpretation of religion in Canadian society; secondly, to assess the adequacy and limitations of these perspectives as interpretive frameworks in the Canadian context; and finally, to point out some of the factors in the present situation which need to be taken into consideration in the development of a new perspective.
1. Careless, J. M. S., “Frontierism, Metropolitanism and Canadian History,” Canathan Historical Review, 35 (1954).Google Scholar
2. Oliver, E. H., The Winning of the Frontier (Toronto: Ryerson Press, 1930)Google Scholar. Biographical materials are available in MacKinnon's, ClarenceA Life of Principal Oliver (Toronto: Ryerson Press, 1936)Google Scholar, and the Transactions of the Royal Society of Canada, Ord series, 30 (1936), Proceedings, pp. xv–xvili.Google Scholar
3. Cf. Gressley, Gene M., “The Turner Thesis: A Problem in Historiography,” Agriculttural History, 32 (1958), 227–249.Google Scholar The two most recent studies of the Turner—anti- Turner debate are Hofstadter, Richard and Lipset, S. M., eds., Turner and the Sociology of the Frontier (New York: Basic Books, Inc., 1968)Google Scholar, and Hofstadter, Richard, The Progressive Historians (New York: Alfred A. Knopf Inc., 1968)Google Scholar. The latter work contains an excellent bibliographical essay on all aspects of the controversy.
4. Sage, Walter N., “Some Aspects of the Frontier in Canadian History,” Annual Report of the Canadian Historical Association—1928 (Ottawa: Department of Public Archives, 1929), pp. 62–72.Google Scholar
5. McDougall, John L., “The Frontier School and Canadian History,” Annual Report of the Canadian Historical Association—1929, p. 125.Google Scholar Cf. Zaslow, Morris, “The Frontier Hypothesis in Recent Historiography,” Canadian Historical Review, 29 (1948), 153ff.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6. McNeil, John T., review of The Winning of the Frontier in Canadian Historical Review, 12 (1930), 81.Google Scholar
7. Ibid., 81.
8. One of the few clues to any direct connection between Oliver and the Turner thesis is through Edwin Seligman, R. A., one of Oliver's Ph.D. thesis advisors at Columbia. Lee Benson has pointed out in Turner and Beard: American Historicai Writing Reconsidered (Glencoe, III.: The Free Press, 1960)Google Scholar, that Seligman was the man probably most responsible for bringing Achille Loria to the attention of American scholars and, as Benson shows, Loria 's economic thought had a major impact upon Turner's “frontier thesis.” (Benson, Ibid., pp. 21–34). Oliver's eofleague at the University of Saskatchewan, A. S. Morton, was also a proponent of the frontier thesis.
9. Cf. Mead, Sidney, “Prof. Sweet's Religion and Culture in America: A Review Article,” Church History: Studies in Christianity and Culture, 22 (1953), 35ff.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
10. Oliver, E. H., The Winning of the Frontier, (Toronto: Ryerson Press, 1930), p. 1.Google Scholar
11. Oliver, , The Winning of the Frontier, p. 1.Google Scholar
12. Ibid., p. 1.
13. Ibid., p. 2.
14. Ibid., p. 3.
15. Silcox, Claris Edwin, Church Uni, on in Canada: Its Causes and Consequences (NewYork: Institute of Social and Religious Research, 1933)Google Scholar. Cf. Lipset, Seymour Martin, Agrarian Socialism (U. of California Press, 1950; reissued by Doubleday Anchor Books, 1968)Google Scholar. Lipset also argues that church union in Canada “was largely a movement of the Canadian West.” pp. 41ff.
16. Dorey, G., “Factors which have affected the Development of our Church: Topography, Climate and Rainfall and the Determining Facts of History,” Robertson Lectures 195–53 (United Church Archives).Google Scholar
17. Cragg, Gerald R., “The Present Position and Future Prospects of Canadian Theology,” Canadian Journal of Theology, 1 (1955), 6.Google Scholar
18. E.g., Douglas Clyde Macintosh, Shirley Jackson Case, W. C. Graham, Peter G. Mode, John T. McNeil, William Hordern, Gordon Harland, Lawrence Toombs, MacLean Gilmour, James Smart and recently Gerald H. Cragg himself, to mention only a few.
19. Niebuhr, H. Richard, The Social Sources of Denoininationalism (Henry Bolt and Co., 1929; reprinted by Meridian Books, 1957).Google Scholar
20. Johnson, Benton, “A Critical Appraisal of the Church-Sect Typology,” American Sociological Revtew, 22 (1957), 89.Google Scholar
21. Clark, S. D., Church and Sect in Canada (Toronto: U. of Toronto Press, 1948).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
22. Clark, S. D., The Social Development of Canada (Toronto: U. of Toronto Press, 1942).Google Scholar
23. Clark, , Church and Sect in Canada, p. vii.Google Scholar
24. Brebner, J. B., review of Clark's, S. D.Church and Sect in Canada in Canadian Historical Review, 30 (1949), 76.Google Scholar
25. Clark, , The Social Development of Canada, p. 1., fn. 1.Google Scholar
26. Yinger, Milton, Religion, Soewty and the Indwiduai (New York: Macmillan Co., 1951), pp. 148–155.Google Scholar
27. Berger, Peter L., “The Sociological Study of Sectarianism,” Social Research, 21 (Winter, 1954), 474ff.Google Scholar
28. Mann, W. E., Beet, Cult and Church in Alberta (Toronto: U. of Toronto Press, 1955).Google Scholar
29. Littell, Franklin H., From State Church to Pluralism: A Protestant Interpretation of Religion in Amerwan History (Garden City, N.Y.: Anchor Books, Doubleday and Co., 1962), p. xixGoogle Scholar. Cf. Mead, Sidney E., The Lively Experiment: The Shaping of Christianity in America (New York: Harper and Row, Publishers, 1963), p. 104.Google Scholar
30. Cf. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 6, nos. 1 and 2 (1967)Google Scholar, for a recent reappraisal of the church-sect typology by Paul Gustaf son, Erich Goode, N.J. Demarath and A. W. Eister.
31. Walsh, H. H., “Canada and the Church: A Job for the Historians,” Queens Quarterly, 61 (1954), 78.Google Scholar
32. Armstrong, M. W., The Great Awakening in Nova Scotia, 1776–1809 (Hartford, Conn: The American Society of Church History, 1948).Google Scholar
33. Walsh, H. H., The Christian Church in Canada (Toronto: Ryerson Press, 1956).Google Scholar
34. Moir, John, “The Sectarian Tradition in Canada,” in The Churches and the Canadian Experience, ed. Grant, John W. (Toronto: Ryerson Press, 1963).Google Scholar
35. Ibid., p. 132.
36. Walsh, H. H., “A Canadian Christian Tradition,” in The Churches and the Canadian Experience, p. 158.Google Scholar Cf. Grant, John W., “Asking Questions of the Canadian Past,” Canadian Journal of Theology, 1 (1955), 103,Google Scholar for a similar point of view.
37. Cf. Wilson, Bryan R., Sects and Society (London: Heinemann, 1961Google Scholar; Wilson, B. R., Religion in Secular Society (London: Penguin Books, 1968)Google Scholar; Patterns of Sectarianism, ed. Wilson, B. B. (London: Heinemann, 1967).Google Scholar
38. This article has been recently reprinted in Approaches to Canadian History, ed. Carl Berger (Toronto: U. of Toronto Press, 1967), pp. 15–28.Google Scholar Page references will be to this edition. For a brief comment on the circumstances surrounding the writing and presentation of this paper cf. Lower's, autobiography, My First Seuenty-Five Years (Toronto: Macmillan of Canada, 1967), pp. 272ff.Google Scholar
39. Lower, A. R. M., review of D. G. Creighton's The Commercial Empire of the St. Lawrence, 1760–1850, in Canadian Historical Review, 19 (1938), 207–210.Google Scholar
40. Siegfried, Andre, The Race Question in Canada, (English trans. London, 1907; reissued, Toronto: McClelland and Stewart, 1966), p. 15.Google Scholar
41. A. R. M. Lower, “Two Ways of Life: The Primary Antithesis of Canadian History,” op. cit., p. 22.
42. Berger, In, Approaches to Canadian History, p. 22.Google Scholar
43. Ibid., p. 24.
44. Brown, G. W., ed., Canada (Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press, 1950).Google Scholar
45. Ibid., p. 463.
46. Ibid., p. 463.
47. Ibid., p. 465. Cf. A. R. M. Lower, My First Seventy-Five Years. Lower says that Turner's essay is “the most formative piece of writing in modern history.”“While many a man,” he continues, “has studied the relation of man to his environment, no one else prior to Turner hit the target so neatly in the bull's eye. Turner is open to the serious limitation that his view of the frontier, that is, of the moving edge of civilization into the wilderness, is purely American and hence rather parochial, but it is still the case that his conception has awakened response from every historian worth his salt and has been applied negatively and positively but always with illuminating effect to a thousand situations.” p. 152.
48. G. W. Brown, op. cit., p. 464.
49. Lower, A. R. M., This Most Famous Btream, (Toronto: Ryerson Press, 1954).Google Scholar
50. Ibid. p. 126.
51. Ibid., p. 126.
52. S. M. Lipset in his Agrarian Soclalism also emphasizes this point. After noting that the Methodists are the largest group in the United Church of Canada (p. 218) he states: “The United Church of Canada is comparable to the non-conformist working- men's churches of Great Britain. It has stressed the social gospel aspect of Christianity. Many of its leaders have been active in secular reform activities…. Since it has the least fundamentalist and conservative creed, the United Church tends to attract and influence those who believe in a liberal Christianity that is concerned with establishing ‘the good life’ on earth.” (p. 211–212). Recently Lipset has emphasized the Clark-Underhil thesis concerning Canada's counter-revolutionary tradition and has claimed that “religious organization in Canada, emphasizing elitism and particularism, acted as a counter-force inhibiting excessive individualism (self-orientation) and egalitarianism.” Cf. “Revolution and Counter-Revolution—The United States and Canada,” in The Revolutionary Theme in Contemporary America, ed. Thomas R. Ford (Lexington, Ky.: University of Kentucky Press, 1987), p. 45.Google Scholar The first elaboration of the significance of Canada's counter-revolutionary tradition for the church which I have been able to discover, is in an address by Harold A. Innis on “The Church In Canada” given to the United Church's Board of Evangelism and Social Service on March 18, 1947. Cf. The Annual Report (1947), pp. 47ff.Google Scholar
53. H. H. Walsh, The Christian Church in Canada.
54. Walsh, H. H., “The Canadian Heritage in Canada,” in The Churches and the Canadian Experience, ed. J. W. Grant, p. 272.Google Scholar
55. Lower, A. R. M., review of Walsh's, H. H.The Christian Church in Canada in Canadian Historical Review, 39 (1958), 251–252.Google Scholar
56. Porter, John, The Vertical Mosaic (Toronto: U. of Toronto Press, 1965).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
57. Cf. Eisenstadt, S. N., ed., The Protestant Ethic and Modernization: A Comparative View (New York: Basic Books, Inc., 1968)Google Scholar, for the best modern discussion of this debate. The extensive bibliographies contained in this work point to the massive litera. ture which was available on this subject prior to 1965 when Porter's work was published.
58. Ryan, William F., S. J., The Clergy and Economic Growth in Quebec, 1896–1914 (Quebec: Les Presses De L'Universite Laval, 1966).Google Scholar
59. Ibid., p. 300.
60. Nish, Cameron, review of Ryan's, William F.The Clergy and Economic Growth in Quebec, 1898–1914, in American Historical RevIew, 72 (07, 1967), 1521.Google Scholar
61. Grant, John W., “Asking Questions of the Canadian Past,” Canadian Journal of Theology, 1 (07, 1955), 98 ff.Google Scholar
62. Ibid., 101.
63. Moir, John S., Church and State In Canada West (Toronto: U. of Toronto Press. 1959).Google Scholar
64. Cf. Crysdale, S., The Industrial Struggle and Protestant Ethics in Canada (Toronto: Ryerson Press, 1961)Google Scholar; French, G. S., Parsons and Politics: The Role of the Wesleyan Metiwdists in Upper Canada and the Maritimes from 1780–1855 (Toronto: Ryerson Press, 1962)Google Scholar; Grant, J. W., ed. The Churches and the Canadian Experience (Toronto: Ryerson Press, 1963)Google Scholar; Elgee, W. H., The Social Teachings of the Canadian Churches, Protestant, The Early Period, before 1850 Toronto: Ryerson Press, 1964)Google Scholar; Masters, D. C., Protestant Church Colleges in Canada (Toronto: U. of Toronto Press, 1966)Google Scholar; Grant, J. W., The Canadian Experience of Church Union (Richmond, Va.: John Knox Press, 1967).Google Scholar
65. Kinek, C. F. et al. , eds., Literary History of Canada, revised edition (Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 1967), pp. 830 ff.Google Scholar
66. Naegele, K., “Canadian Society: Some Reflections.” In Blishen, Bernard et al. , ed., Canadian Society, first edition (New York: The Free Press of Gleneoe, Inc., 1961), pp. 27 ff.Google Scholar It should be noted that much of this material has been cut out of the third edition published by Macmillan of Canada, 1968.
67. John Porter, The Vertical Mosaic.
