^1. Handy in Walker, Williston, A History of the Christian Church (Rev.; N. Y.: Charles Scribner's Sons, 1959), p. 472.Google Scholar

^2. Stokes, Anson Phelps, Church and State in the United States (N. Y.: Harper, 1950), I, p. 555.Google Scholar

^3. Purcell, Richard J., Connecticut in Transition, 1775–1818 (Washington: American Historical Assrn, 1918), pp. 76–77Google Scholar. On the life of Leland see Some Events in the Life of John Leland, Written by Himself (1838), in The Writings of the Late Elder John Leland, ed. Miss L. F. Greene (N.Y.: G. W. Wood, 1845), pp. 9–40Google Scholar; Butterfield, L. H., “Elder John Leland, Jeffersonian Itinerant,” Antiquarian Soc., Proceedings, LXIII (10, 1952), 155–242Google Scholar; Smith, J. T., “Life and Times of Rev. John Leland,” Baptist Quarterly (April, 1871), 230–255Google Scholar; Sprague, W. B., Annals of the American Pulpit (N. Y.: Robert Carter & Brothers, 1857–1969), Vol. VIGoogle Scholar: The Baptists.

^4. On the life of Backus see Allison, William Henry, “Isaac Backus,” Dictionary of American Biography, I, pp. 468–472Google Scholar; Hovey, Alvah, A Memoir of the Life and Times of the Rev. Isaac Backus (Boston: 1859)Google Scholar; Maston, T. B., The Ethical and Social Attitudes of Isaac Backus (unpublished Ph.D dissertation, Yale Univ., 1939)Google Scholar; Sprague, loc. cit.

^5. Calamandrei, Mauro, “Neglected Aspects of Roger Williams' Thought,” Church History, XXI (09, 1952), 239.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

^6. For a study of Williams', “image” in American historiography, see my “Roger Williams and the Historians,” Church History, XXXIII (12, 1963), 432–451.Google Scholar

^7. Hudson, (ed.), Experiments of Spiritual Life and Health (Phila.: Westminster, 1951), p. 13.Google Scholar

^8. The Bboiuly Tenent of Persecution, in The Complete Writings of Roger Williams (7 vols., N. Y.: Russell and Russell, 1963), III, pp. 367–68Google Scholar. All subsequent references to Williams' works are to this edition, the first six volumes of which are an exact reproduction of the heretofore standard Narragansett Club edition (Providence: 1866–74).

^9. The Bloody Tenent yet More Bloody, IV, p. 337.Google Scholar

^10. The Bloudy Tenent, III, p. 11.Google Scholar

^11. Ibid., p. 258.

^12. Letter from Williams to Major Mason, June 22, 1670, VI, p. 347.

^13. The Bloudy Tenent, III, p. 13.Google Scholar

^14. Cf. Ibid., p. 357, passim; The Bloody Tenent yet More Bloody, IV, p. 277, passisn.Google Scholar

^15. Miller, , Williams, Roger: His Contribution to the American Tradition (Indianapolis: Bobbs-Merrill, 1953), p. 32Google Scholar; cf. pp. 32ff, 149ff, passim.

^16. The Bboudy Tenent, III, p. 258.Google Scholar

^17. Ibid., p. 283.

^18. Miller, , Orthodoxy in Massachusetts, 1630 - 1650 (Cambridge: Harvard Univ. Press, 1933), pp. 157–58CrossRefGoogle Scholar. Herein Miller delineates the reasoning behind the practice of non-Separatist congregationalism.

^19. Queries of Highest Consideration, II, p. 261.Google Scholar

^20. The Bloudy Tenent, III, pp. 174–75Google Scholar. As to culture-religion, Williams would shudder at the extent to which his name has been and still is associated with the notion of America as a “Christian nation.” One of the irritations between himself and Massachusetts was his insistence that it was blasphemy to call Europe “Christendom” or “the Christian World.” Cf. Winthrop, John, The History of New England from 1680 to 1649, ed. Savage, James (Boston: Little, Brown and Co., 1853), I, p. 145.Google Scholar

^21. The Bloudy Tenent, III, p. 175.Google Scholar

^22. Queries of Highest Consideration, II, p. 274.Google Scholar

^23. Cf. The Bboudy Tenet, III, pp. 97–116.Google Scholar

^24. Ibid., p. 187.

^25. Mr. Cottons Letter Examined, I, p. 392Google Scholar; cf. The Bloudy Tenent, III, p. 286.Google Scholar

^26. Cf. Letter of Jefferson to the Danbury Baptist Association of Connecticut, January 1, 1802; in The Writings of Thomas Jefferson, ed. A. A. Lipscomb and A. E. Bergh (Washington: The Thomas Jefferson Memorial Assn., 1903), XVI, pp. 281–82.Google Scholar

^27. The Bboudy Tenent, III, p. 73.Google Scholar

^28. Cf. Mr. Cottons Letter Examined, I, p. 335Google Scholar; The Bboudy Tenent, III, pp. 343, 398Google Scholar; The Bloody Tenent yet More Bloody, IV, p. 187.Google Scholar

^29. The Bboudy Tenent, III, p. 248Google Scholar. Cf. Ibid., pp. 249–50, 343, 366, 398; The Bloody Tenent yet More Bloody, IV, p. 187.Google Scholar

^30. Parrington, , Main Currents in American Thought (N.Y.: Harcourt, Brace and Co., 1927–1930), I, pp. 62–75.Google Scholar

^31. Simpson, , “How Democratic Was Roger Williams?” William and Mary Quarterly, 3rd ser., XIII (1956), 53–67CrossRefGoogle Scholar; cf. esp. p. 59.

^32. The Bboudy Tenent, III, p. 398.Google Scholar

^33. Ibid.

^34. Ibid., pp. 372–73.

^35. Ibid., p. 358.

^36. Experiments of Spiritual Life and Health, VII, pp. 91–92.Google Scholar

^37. The Bloudy Tenent, III, p. 388.Google Scholar

^38. Quoted in Bainton, Roland H., “The Appeal to Reason and the American Constitution,” The Constitution Reconsidered, ed. Read, Conyers (N. Y.: Columbia Univ. Press, 1938), p. 125.Google Scholar

^39. Letter to the Town of Providence, Jan., 1654/1655, VI, pp. 278–79.

^40. The Bloody Tenent yet More Bloody, IV, p. 208.Google Scholar

^41. The Bloudy Tenent, III, pp. 138, 290.Google Scholar

^42. Ibid., p. 11.

^43. Ibid., p. 3.

^44. Ibid., p. 367.

^45. The Bloody Tenent yet More Bloody, IV, pp. 320–21.Google Scholar

^46. George, Fox Digg'd out of His Burrowes, V, p. 72.Google Scholar

^47. Perry Miller asserts that “the secret of the book is … typology.” (Roger Williams, p. 39. Such an assertion is interesting and even stimulating, but hardly more. Williams was civil and courteous to the barbaric and savage Indians because he took seriously the doctrine of the natural and total depravity of human nature, which is, after all, the most democratic point of Calvinism.

^48. Key into the Language of America, I, pp. 220–221.Google Scholar

^49. Experiments of Spiritual Life and Health, VII, p. 62.Google Scholar

^50. Quoted in Brentano, Frances, Nation under God (Great Neck, N. Y.: Channel Press, 1957), pp. 11–12.Google Scholar

^51. Winslow, Ora, Master Roger Williams, (N. Y.: Macmillan, 1957), p. 291.Google Scholar

^52. cf. Hudson, , “John Locke—Preparing the Way for the Revolution,” Journal of Presbyterian History, XLII (03, 1964), 19–38.Google Scholar

^53. Letter on Toleration, in The Works of John Locke (12th ed.; London: 1824), V, pp. 4, 47.Google Scholar

^54. The Papers of James Madison, ed. William T. Hutchinson and William M. E. Racial (Chicago: Univ. of Chicago Press, 1962), I, p. 106.Google Scholar

^55. For the full text, with discussion of the changes suggested and actually incorporated, see Ibid., I, pp. 170–79.

^56. Cf. “James Madison's Autobiography,” ed. Douglass Adair, William and Mary Quarterly, 3rd Ser., II (April, 1945), p. 199.Google Scholar

^57. Adair, , “James Madison,” in The Lives of Eighteen from Princeton, ed. Thorp, Willard (Princeton, N. J.: Princeton Univ. Press, 1946), p. 147.Google Scholar

^58. Notes on Virginia, in The Works of Jefferson, ed. Paul L. Ford (N. Y.: G. P. Putnam's Sons, 1904), IV, p. 81.Google Scholar

^59. “Autobiography,” in The Writings of Thomas Jefferson, ed. Andrew A. Lipscomb and Albert E. Bergh (Washington: The Thomas Jefferson Memorial Assn., 1903), I, p. 57.Google Scholar

^60. For full text of the Bill, including portions deleted from the original draft, see The papers of Thomas Jefferson, ed. Julian P. Boyd (Princeton, N. J.: Princeton Univ. Press, 1950) II, pp. 545ff.Google Scholar

^61. Luebke, F. C., The Development of Thomas Jefferson's Religious Opinions, 1743–1800 (unpublished M. A. thesis, Claremont Graduate School, 1958), p. 92Google Scholar; cf. pp. 92–99. Luebke documents Jefferson's “unwavering faith in reason” (p. 93), and shows his almost total reliance on Locke in the “Notes on Religion” prepared for use in the legislative debates (cf. pp. 75ff). A portion of this excellent study, perhaps the most complete analysis yet made of Jefferson's religious opinions, appeared as “The Origins of Thomas Jefferson's AntiClericalism,” Church History, XXXII (September, 1963), 344–356.Google Scholar

^62. Madison says the free exercise of religion is, “in its nature, an unalienable right.” For the full text, see The Writings of James Madison, ed. Gaillard Hunt (N. Y.: G. P. Putnam's Sons, 1901), I, pp. 183–91Google Scholar. For an extensive discussion of Locke's influence on both Madison and Jefferson, see Mecklin, John M., The Story of American Dissent (N. Y.: Harcourt, Brace and Co., 1934), pp. 242–342.Google Scholar

^63. cf. Adair, “James Madison,” loc. cit., p. 143.

^64. Sweet, Religion in Colonial America (N. Y.: Charles Scribner's Sons 1951), p. 338.Google Scholar

^65. Cf. Curti, Merle, “The Great Mr. Locke: America's Philosopher, 1783- 1861,” The Huntington Library Bulletin, no. 11 (Ap., 1937), 107–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

^66. Cf. Hazard, Paul, European Thought in the Eighteenth Century, trans. J. Lewis May (New Haven: Yale Univ. Press, 1954), pp. 44–58.Google Scholar

^67. Cf. Ibid., pp. 113–276.

^68. Mead, , “American Protestantism during the Revolutionary Epoah,” Church History, XXII (12., 1953), 293.Google Scholar

^69. Mead, , “Denominationalism: The Shape of Protestantism in America,” Church History, XXIII (12, 1954), 314Google Scholar. For further discerning observaations by the same author, see “From Coercion to Persuasion: Another Look at the Rise of Religious Liberty and the Emergence of Denominationalism,” Ibid., XXV (December, 1956), 317–37; and “Thomas Jefferson's ‘Fair Experiment,’ Religious Freedom,” Religion in Life, XXIII (Autumn, 1954), 566–79Google Scholar. In a some what altered form, these and other essays are collected in Mead, , The Lively Experiment, The Shaping of Christianity in America (N. Y.: Harper & Row, 1963).Google Scholar

^70. “Autobiography,” Writings, ed. Lipscomb and Bergh (1903), I, p. 58.Google Scholar

^71. A Blow at the Root (New London: 1801), p. 6.Google Scholar

^72. The Virginia Chronicle (Norfolk: 1790), p. 44.Google Scholar

^73. The Connecticut Dissenters' Strong Box (New London: 1802), p 39.Google Scholar

^74. A Blow at the Root, p. 3f; The Yankee Spy (Boston: 1794), p. 10.Google Scholar

^75. Cf. Virginia Chronicle, p. 24; The Yankee Spy; Politics Sermonized (Springfield, Mass.: 1806), p. 10.Google Scholar

^76. Cf. The Connecticut Dissenters' Strong Box, pp. 38–39.

^77. Cf. A Blow at the Boot, p. 6; Trailsportation of the Mail, in Writings, ed. Greene, p. 565.Google Scholar

^78. Cf. A Blow at the Root, p. 7.

^79. Short Sayings (Pittsfield, Mass.: 1830), p. 4.Google Scholar

^80. Cf. A Blow at the Root, p. 16; Politics Sermonized, p. 4; passim.

^81. Gewehr, Wesley M., The Great Awakening in Virginia, 1740–1790 (Durham, N. C.: Duke University Press, 1930), p. 191.Google Scholar

^82. A widely circulated pamphlet bears the title, The Rights of Conscience Inalienable (printed as a part ofThe Connecticut Dissenters' Strong Box). Cf. also A Blow at the Root p. 5; Short Sayings, pp. 19–20; Yankee Spy, p. 19; passim.

^83. Cf. A Blow at the Boot, p. 4; Politics Sermonized, pp. 4, 7; Short Sayings, pp. 17–18; The Yankee Spy, p. 3; Part of a Speech delivered at Suffield, Con, on the First Jubilee of the United States (Pittsfield, Mass.: 1826), p. 7.Google Scholar

^84. Butterfield, “Elder John Leland,” loc. cit., p. 242. In one passage Leland referred alternately to “the principle of natural right” and “the New Testament” (The Yankee Spy, p. 14), and elsewhere he spoke, in turn, as “a religionist” and “a statesman” (A Blow at the Root, p. 12).

^85. Gaustad, , “The Backus-Leland Tradition,” in Baptist Concepts of the Church, ed. Hudson, Winthrop S. (Phila.: Judson, 1959), p. 110.Google Scholar

^86. For Gaustad's very convincing evidence, cf. Ibid., pp. 109–110.

^87. Cf. A Fish caught in his own Net (Boston: 1768), pp. 15–16.Google Scholar

^88. E.g., The Atonement of Christ (Boston: 1787)Google Scholar; The Doctrine of Particular Election and Final Perseverance (Boston: 1789)Google Scholar; The Doctrine of Sovereign Grace Opened and Vindicated (Providence: 1771)Google Scholar; The Infinite Importance of the Obedience of Faith, and of a Separation from the World (Boston: 1791)Google Scholar; The Sovereign Decrees of God (Boston: 1773)Google Scholar; The Doctrine of Universal Salvation, Examined and Refuted (Providence: 1782).Google Scholar

^89. A seminal documet for Puritanism was Browne's, RobertA Treatise of Reformation without tarying for anie (1582).Google Scholar

^90. A Door Opened (Boston: 1783), p. 12.Google Scholar

^91. Address before the Massachusetts convention of 1788, quoted in Backus, , A History of New England, with Particular Reference to the Denomination of Christians called Baptists, ed. Weston, David (Newton, Mass.,: Backus Historical Society, 1871), II, p. 336Google Scholar. Cf. An Appeal to the Public (Boston: 1773), p. 12Google Scholar; Truth Is Great (Boston: 1781), p. 31.Google Scholar

^92. Cf. A Door Opened, p. 6; A Fish caught in His own Net; A Short Description of the Difference between the Bond-Woman and the Free (Boston: 1770), p. 22Google Scholar; A Discourse Concerning the Materials … of the Church of Christ (Boston: 1773), pp. 51–78Google Scholar

^93. Cf. All true Ministers of the Gospel (Boston: 1754; 2nd ed., 1792).Google Scholar

^94. Cf. Truth Is Great; A Door Opened, p. 11.

^95. Cf. A Discourse Concerning the Materials, pp. 36–40; Policy, as well as Honesty, forbids the use of Secular Force in Religious affairs (Boston: 1779), pp. 7ff.Google Scholar

^96. Cf.A Door Opened, p. 11; Policy, as well as Honesty, p. 11.

^97. Cf. An Appeal to the Public, pp. 3–11; passim.

^98. Cf.An Appeal to the Public, p. 13; A Door Opened, p. 11; A DiscourseConcerning the Materials, pp. 37, 48–49; Policy, as well as Honesty, pp. 11–12; A Letter to a Gentleman in the Massachusetts General Assembly (Boston: 1771), pp. 4–5.Google Scholar

^99. Quoted in A Seasonable Plea for Liberty of Conscience (Boston: 17–70), p. 12Google Scholar. Cf. Letter on Toleration, in Locke, Works (12th ed., 1824), V, p. 12.Google Scholar

^100. The most extensive estimate of Williams, which in itself is quite brief, is in Government and Liberty Described (Boston: 1778), p. 9Google Scholar. Cf.Truth Is Great, p. 33.

^101. A History of New England (1871 ed.), I, p. 270.Google Scholar

^102. Cf. esp. A Seasonable Plea; A Letter to a Gentleman in the Massachusetts General Assembly; Evangelical Ministers described (Boston: 1772.)Google Scholar

^103. Maston, , The Ethical and Social Attitudes of Isaac Bacicus, p. 163.Google Scholar

^104. A Seasonable Plea, p. 12.

^105. Meyer, , Church arwi State in Massachusetts from 1740 to 1833 (Cleveland: Western Reserve University Press, 1930) p. 93.Google Scholar

^106. From Twice-Told Tales, quoted by Wecter, Dixon, The Hero in America (N. Y.: Charles Scribner's Sons, 19–41), p. 31.Google Scholar

^107. Ramsay, , History of the United States (2nd ed.; Phila: 1818), I, p. 183.Google Scholar

^108. The Age of Inquiry, by a True Baptist, p. 16; quoted in Purcell, Connecticut in Transition, p. 77.

^109. Cf. Hudson, , “Theological Convictions and Democracy,” Theology Today, X July, 1953), 230–39CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Haller, , “The Puritan Background to the First Amendment, in The Constitution Reconsidered, ed. Read, Conyers (N. Y.: Columbia Univ. Press, 1938)Google Scholar. See also the statement by Bryce, James, The American Commonwealth (3rd ed.; N. Y.: Macmillan, 1893), I, p. 306Google Scholar; which is properly qualified by Niebuhr, H. Richard, The Kingdom of God in America, p. 79.Google Scholar

^110. Mead, “American Protestentism during the Revolutionary Epoch,” loc. cit., 293.

^111. Cf. Williams, Daniel Day, “Tradition and Experience,” in The Shaping of American Religion, Vol. I of Beligion in American Life, ed. Smith, James Ward and Jamison, A. Leland (Princeton, N. J.: Princeton Univ. Press, 1961), p. 475.Google Scholar

^112. Ward, , The Simple Cooler of Aggawam in America, in Tracts and Other Papers, ed. Force, Peter (Washington: 1844), III, p. 7.Google Scholar