Hostname: page-component-5c6d5d7d68-lvtdw Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-08-15T12:12:47.576Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Church and The Movement for Congo Reform

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 July 2009

Catherine Ann Cline
Catherine Ann Cline
Affiliation:
Notre Dame College of Staten Island
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

When Christian missionaries returned to the Congo in the nineteenth century, all traces of the promising Portuguese missionary effort of the late fifteenth and early sixteenth centuries had been obliterated. The Kingdom of the Congo which had produced several generations of Christian Kings, thousands of converts, even an African clergy and an African Bishop, had been literally swept away by the European slave trade. The Church had paid a heavy price for its failure to restrain the greed of the faithful, and one would scarcely expect to find the error repeated. Furthermore, the intervening centuries had produced in Europe a growth of humanitarian sentiment which had sensitized the Christian conscience to the suffering of the oppressed; indeed this concern for the temporal welfare of the African had been an important factor in the outburst of nineteenth century missionary activity. Yet when this second encounter of European and African produced in the Congo Free State a form of exploitation which rivalled the first in its brutality, dedicated Catholic missionaries and zealous Catholic prelates staunchly defended the regime against the attacks of reformers. The explanation of this melancholy episode appears to lie in the fact that sectarian interest, national loyalty, and an overwhelming faith in the benefits of Europeanization were allowed to obscure the essential facts.

Type
Research Article
Information
Church History , Volume 32 , Issue 1 , March 1963 , pp. 46 - 56
Copyright
Copyright © American Society of Church History 1963

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Cuvelier, J., L'ancien royaume du Congo (Bruges, 1946).Google Scholar

2. “… on voit toujours … un esprit essentiellement opposé à celui de l'Eglise, une égale protection accordée à l'erreur et à la vérité et une sorte d'appel à toutes les sectes…” wrote Cardinal Lavigerie of Leopold's African International Association in a report to the Congregation of the Propaganda, January 2, 1878. Storme, M. B., Rapports du Père Planque, de Mgr. Combonisur l'Association Internationale Africaine (Brussels, 1957), p. 104.Google Scholar In 1886 the Belgian Minister to Rome insisted to Cardinal Simeoni that the Belgian Bishops be directed to publish a letter to the clergy to stop rumors that free-masons dominated the Congo Free State. Dieu, Leon, Dans la brousse congolaise (Liège, 1946), pp. 26–27.Google Scholar As late as October 29, 1887, the Abbé Forget, head of the African Seminary at Louvain, complained that the evangelization of the Congo was being impeded by “… les préjugés … existent chez les catholiques, voire les prêtres … qui s'exagèrent les difficultés à craindre par suite de l'indifférentisme de beaucoup des employés de Congo.” Simon, A.. Catholioisme et Politique: Documents Inedits (1882–1909), (Wetteren, 1955), p. 267.Google Scholar

3. Slade, Ruth, English Speaking Missions in the Congo Independent State, 1878–1908, (Brussels, 1959), pp. 74–76.Google Scholar

4. Ibid., p. 141; Dieu, p. 34.

5. The Holy Ghost Fathers retired to the French Congo. de Witte, Jehan, Les deux Congo, (Paris, 1913) pp. 68–69.Google Scholar The White Fathers remained at Lake Tanganyika with the understanding that they would staff their missions entirely with Belgians. de Meeus, D. and Steenbergher, R., Les missions religieuses au Congo Belge (Antwerp, 1947), pp. 26–27.Google Scholar

6. Dieu, pp. 9–16.

7. Cardinal Simeoni told the representative of the Scheut Fathers, a Belgian Order, that they should respond to the King's request, even if it meant relinquishing some of their missions in China. Ibid., p. 25.

8. The single exception were the Mill Hill Fathers, an English Order, who were invited to the Congo by Leopold as part of his effort to win the support of English Catholics. Slade, Ruth, “King Leopold II and the Attitude of English and American Catholics Towards the Anti-Congolese Campaign”, Zaire (06, 1957), XI, 596.Google Scholar

9. Lavigerie, Cardinal, Documents sur la fondation de l'oeuvre anti-esclavagiste, (St. Cloud, 1889) p. lviii.Google Scholar

10. Ceulemens, P., La question arabe et le Congo (1888–1892), (Brussels, 1959), pp. 290–291.Google Scholar

11. Lavigerie, pp. 119–158.

12. The Holy See appears to have taken the initiative in proposing an international conference, although it was not represented at Brussels because of the objection of the Italian government. Baunard, Louis, Le Cardinal Lavigerie (Paris, 1898), II, 473–475.Google Scholar

13. Banning, Emile, Mémoires politiques et diplomatiques: comment fut fondé le Congo Belge. (Paris–Brussels, 1927), pp. 140–143.Google Scholar

14. Banning mentions as well Stanley's speech in Brussels on his return from the Congo and the success of the Belgian companies which had been established there as factors in bringing about this change. Ibid., p. 177.

15. Missions Belges de la Compagnie de Jesus, 1899, pp. 27–28.Google Scholar

16. Stenmans, Alain, La reprise du Congo par la Belgique (Brussels, 1949), p. 232.Google Scholar

17. The State defined as “unoccupied” all lands which were not cultivated. Natives had recognized tribal ownership of those lands on which they hunted, fished, or gathered food.

18. Cattier, Félicien, Etude sur la situation de l'Etat Indépendant du Congo (Brussels, 1906), pp. 23–30; 65–72.Google Scholar

19. For a description of conditions in the Congo see Cattier, and Vermeersch, Arthur, La question congolaise (Brussels, 1906).Google Scholar

20. Protest arose in Belgium at the inception of the Leopoldian regime. They were entirely concerned, however, with the effect of the State on Belgian enterprises rather than with its treatment of the natives. Witte, pp. 248–249; Woeste, Charles, Mémoires pour servir à l'histoire contemporaine de la Belgique, 1859–1894 (Brussels, 1927), I, 472Google Scholar; Vandervelde, Emile, Souuenirs d'un militant socialiste (Paris, 1939), p. 70.Google Scholar In England the Aborigines Protection Society had worked for Congo reform throughout the decade of the nineties. Morel became interested in the question only in 1900, but it was he who organized a popular protest through the very effective Congo Reform Association.

21. The only biography of Morel, Cocks', F. S.E. D. Morel: the Man and his Work (London, 1920)Google Scholar, is rather uncritical. Of Morel's numerous writings on the Congo question, the most important are King Leopold's Rule in Africa (London, 1904) and Red Rubber (Liverpool, 1905).Google Scholar

22. Slade, Ruth, King Leopold's Congo (London, 1962), pp. 178–180.Google Scholar

23. Missions Belges, 1903, p. 322.Google Scholar

24. Augouard, Prosper. Physionomie documentaire ou vie inconnue de Monseigneur Augouard, (Evreux, 1934) pp. 226–228.Google Scholar

25. Missions Belges, 1903, p. 322.Google Scholar

26. It became Le Mouvement des Missions Catholiques in 1903.

27. Le Monvement antiesclavagiste, 06 1, 1900, pp. 104–108.Google Scholar

28. Morel to the Editor of the Bristol Evening News, 01 28, 1904.Google Scholar Morel Collection. London School of Economics.

29. Le Mouvement antiesclavagiste, 06 1, 1900, pp. 101–102.Google Scholar

30. Ibid., June 1, 1900, p. 103; December 25, 1900, pp. 302–303.

31. Ruth Slade, “King Leopold II and the Attitude of English and American Catholics toward the Anti-Congolese Campaign,” pp. 593–612; Ellis, John Tracy, The Life of James Cardinal Gibbons (Milwaukee, 1952), II, 317–318.Google Scholar

32. Cattier, pp. 281–282.

33. Stenmans, p. 324.

34. Missionary Herald, 04, 1903, pp. 187–188.Google Scholar

35. Missions Belges, 1904, pp. 413–423.Google Scholar

36. Slade, , English Speaking Missions in the Congo Independent State, pp. 170–175Google Scholar; Vermeersch describes Protestant missionaries as “voyageurs parfois autant et plus qu'apôtres.” La question congolaise, p. 281.Google Scholar

37. Vermeersch, Arthur, La question congolaise, pp. 278–287.Google Scholar

38. Morel's letters to Grattan Guinness of the Regions Beyond Missionary Union are filled with warnings on this score. “I entreat you,” he wrote on February 16, 1904, “in the interest of the cause, not to give our opponents any loophole for shoving in religious controversies.” Morel Collection.

39. Bethune, Leon de, “Les Missions Catholiques de l'Etat Indépendent du Congo,” La Revue Générale (09, 1903), LXXVIII, 332.Google Scholar

40. Slade, Ruth, “English Missionaries and the Beginning of the Anti-Congolese Campaign in England,” Revue Belge de Philologie et d'Histoire (1955), XXXIII, 72–73.Google Scholar A late as January, 1903 the Baptist Missionary Society presented a complimentary address to Leopold. Missionary Herald, 04, 1903, pp. 187–188.Google Scholar

41. Father Van Hencxthoven charged that the Protestant missionaries created a “dualisme fatal” which the State had the right and the duty to destroy. Missions Belges (1904), pp. 34–35.Google Scholar

42. One Protestant missionary, Mrs. Hope Morgan, accused Catholics of teaching the natives lying and stealing were permissible. Missions Belges (1904), pp. 250–260.Google Scholar

43. Augouard, Prosper, 28 années au Congo: lettres de Mgr. Augouard. (Poitiers, 1905). I, 276, 407Google Scholar; II, 158, 172.

44. Ibid., II, 374, “Dellicour, F., Mgr. Augouard et Congo Belge,” Bulletin des Séances. Institut Royal Colonial Belge (1944), 22–25.Google Scholar

45. Le Mouvement antieselavagiste (09 1, 1900) pp. 233–235.Google Scholar

46. Missions Belges (1902) p. 436.Google Scholar

47. The criticisms were directed particularly against the conduct of the “colonies scolaires” established by the missionaries to care for orphans and freed slave children whom the missionaries declared its wards. The Commission accused the missionaries of taking charge of children who were over-age or who were being cared for by their relatives in order to profit from their labor. The Commission appears to have confused the “colonies” with the “ferme-chapelles” where residence was voluntary. There is no evidence to support the charge that the missionaries profited in any way from either the “colonies scolaires” or the “fermechapelles.” Missions Belges (1905), pp. 469–487Google Scholar; Vermeersch, , La question congolaise, pp. 134–135.Google Scholar

48. Charles, P. “Rapport sur le dossier ‘Commission d'enqnête,’” Bulletin des Séances, Institut Royal Coloaial Belge (1954), pp. 219–220.Google Scholar

49. Missions Belges, (1905), p. 487.Google Scholar

50. Les Missions Belges (1906), pp. 210–211Google Scholar; Vermeersch, , La question congolaise, pp. 81–82.Google Scholar

51. Stengers, J., “Le role de la Commission d'Enquête de 1904–1906 an Congo,” Annuaire de l'Institut de Philologie et d'Histoire Orientales et Slaves (1950), X, 801.Google Scholar

52. La Belgique maritime et coloniale, (02 4, 1906), 150.Google Scholar

53. Missions Belges (1906), pp. 258–259.Google Scholar

54. Stenmans, p. 325.

55. Vermeersch, Arthur, Les destinées du Congo Belge (Brussels, 1906).Google Scholar

56. Carton de Wiart, H., Souvenirs politiques (Bruges, 1948), p. 230.Google Scholar

57. In general, the “Old Right” supported Leopold while the “Young Right” opposed him. Stenmans, p. 371.

58. Mercier, D. J., Oeuvres pastorales (Louvain, 1929), II, 117–121.Google Scholar