Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-sjtt6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-25T22:30:25.809Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Forming of a Modern American Denomination

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 July 2009

Elwyn A. Smith
Elwyn A. Smith
Affiliation:
Pittsburgh Theological Seminary
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Among the reasons for the emergence of American denominationalism, the impact of the separation of church and state has never been under-rated by scholars. The same is true of the religious pluralism of the nation. Other environmental conditions of comparable importance have been listed but those who recognize the toughness and adaptability of the modern American denominational structure have reason to ask whether historians have done full justice to its internal dynamic. The reaction against denominational history in the grand style is, of course, well warranted. Over against “denominational historians who can recount the achievements of the several denominations as separate bodies, the reasons for their separateness, and the grounds of their greatness and glory,” W. E. Garrison wrote, “we must concern ourselves chiefly with the movements of the common Christian mind, the issues which drive planes of cleavage through all denominations transverse to those which divide them from each other.…” Some of these unitive issues are American-made; others are rooted in Europe. But the denomination, as Garrison recognized, is the mode in which American church history manifests itself, a vehicle whose continuities must be grasped if modern American church-manship is to be understood.

Type
Research Article
Information
Church History , Volume 31 , Issue 1 , March 1962 , pp. 74 - 99
Copyright
Copyright © American Society of Church History 1962

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Cf. Troeltsch, Ernst, Social Teachings of the Christian Churches, trans. Wyon, Olive (2 vols.; London, 1931).Google Scholar Troeltsch establishes theses which deserve more serious attention from contemporary social historians. “Only those who see in all spiritual movements merely the influence of social movements, and especially those who imagine that all religion is merely the reflection of social conditions in transcendental terms, will see in them a direct cause of the religious crisis. In reality, however, all impartial religious research reveals the fact that, to some extent at least, religious thought is independent; it has its own inner dialectic and its own power of development…” I, 48.

2 The March of Faith (New York, 1933), 178.Google Scholar

3 An Errand of Mercy (Chapei Hill, 1960), 255.Google Scholar

4 Ibid., chap. xi.

5 Ibid., 271.

6 Cf. Nichols, R. H., “Review of Religion, in Colonial America,” Church History, XII (1943).Google Scholar

7 “Denominationalism As a Basis for Ecumenicity; A Seventeenth Century Conception,” CH, XXIV (1955), 32–50.Google Scholar

8 Beyond those noted elsewhere in this paper, Mead has written “American Protestantism, During the Revolutionary Epoch,” CH, XXII (December, 1953)Google Scholar; “The American People; Their Space, Time, and Religion,” CH, XXXIV (1954)Google Scholar; “American Protestantism Since the Civil War …,” Journal of Religion, XXXVI (1956)Google Scholar; “From Coercion to Persuasion: Another Look at the Rise of Religious Liberty and the Emergence of Denominationalism,” CH, XXV (1956)Google Scholar; “The Rise of the Evangelical Conception of the Ministry in America, 1607–1850,” The Ministry in Historical Perspectives (Harpers, 1956)Google Scholar; “A Historian's View of the Church and Theological Education in America,” Bulletin 24 of the American Association of Theological Schools (Dayton, 1960), 9–14.Google Scholar

9 The State of Religion Among the Protestant Dissenters in Virginia; A Letter to the Rev. Mr. Joseph Bellamy, Boston, 1751 (Princeton Seminary Library), Sprague Collection, 1st series, vol. 41, p. 7—hereafter indicated as (PSL), Spr., I, 41:7.

10 Sermon at Portsmouth, New Hampshire, October 12, 1791 (PSL), Spr., I, 80:1.

11 Panoplist, I (New Series), 372.

12 Frame of Government of Pennsylvania, 1682; Charter of Privilege, 1701, quoted in The American Constitutions and Religion, ed. Moehlman, C. H. (Berne, Ind., 1938), 33, 35.Google Scholar

13 Moehlman, op. cit., 41–45.

14 Sidney Mead, ibid., 294.

15 For British backgrounds, see Foster, op. cit., chapters 3 and 5.

16 “Denominationalism: the Shape of Protestantism in America,” CH, XXIII (1954), 291.Google Scholar

17 Panoplist, I (New Series), 427.

18 Elsbree, Oliver Wendell, The Rise of the Missionary Spirit in America, 1790–1815 (Williamsport, Pa., 1928), 45.Google Scholar

19 Keller, Charles Roy, The Second Great Awakening in Connecticut (New Haven, 1942)Google Scholar. Cf. Panoplist, IV (New Series), 91.

20 Cf. notes 18 and 19.

21 Lyman Beecher, A Reformation of Morals Practicable and Indispensable … (Andover, 1814).

22 The Faith Once Delivered to the Saints …, October 15, 1823 (Boston, 1824).

23 Sermon at Woolcot, Connecticut, September 21, 1814 (Andover, 1815).

24 The Remedy for Duelling … Occasional Sermons, 1807 (PSL), Spr., I, 13:18.

25 Sermon Subsequent to the Formation of the Connecticut Society for the Promotion of Good Morals, (Hartford, 1813), 16.

26 The Faith Once Delivered to the Saints …, 8. Illustration of the actual operation of such societies may be found in “An Address to the Council of Censors of the State of Vermont,” Panoplist, III, 265.

27 Panoplist, III, 265.

28 Published at Andover, 1818. Subsequent references, 4, 24.

29 Bodo, John R., The Protestant Clergy and Public Issues, 1812–1848 (Princeton, 1954)Google Scholar. Passim.

30 The Faith Once Delivered to the Saints …, 3, 36.

31 The Great Tradition of the American Churches (New York, 1953)Google Scholar, 74f. Cf. Maclear, J. F., “‘The True American Union’ of Church and State,” CH, XXVIII (1959), 50–59.Google Scholar

32 The Nature and Danger of Infidel Philosophy, preached September, 1797 (New Haven, 1798).

33 Keller, op. cit., 137.

34 Morse, James King, Jedediah Morse, A Champion of New England Orthodoxy (New York, 1939)Google Scholar, 93.

35 Panoplist, I (New Series), 402.

36 On the Bavarian Illuminati, cf. Stauffer, Vernon, “New England and the Bavarian Illuminati,” Columbia University Studies in History, Economics and Public Law (New York, 1918), 82Google Scholar, 1–374. Cf. Foster, op. cit., 18–25; Letter of Morse to Abiel Holmes, August 15, 1798 (Historical Society of Pennsylvania), Simon Gratz Collection, American Clergy; Letter of Charles Nisbet to Jedediah Morse commending the alarum of John Robinson (HSP), Dreer Collection, V.

37 Cf. Morse, op. cit., chapters 5 and 6 for a concise and well-documented account of the conflict with unitarianism. Also Panoplist, III, 89f, 203, 443. It should be noted that there was no distinct line between the missionary responsibilities of the Congregational associations and the missionary societies. The American Board of Commissioners was formed on the initiative of two state associations.

38 True Reasons on Which the Election of a Hollis Professor of Divinity … Was Opposed at the Board of Overseers, February 14, 1805.

39 Panoplist, I, iii.

40 Ibid., 307–312.

41 Ibid., I, iii.

42 Ibid., I, 393ff, 472ff, 483ff.

43 Op. cit., 116.

44 Panoplist, III, 306ff, 345ff.

45 Ibid., III, 312, 346.

46 Ibid., I (New Series), 457.

47 Ibid., III, 306ff, and I (New Series), 321; also The Constitution and Associated Statutes of the Theological Seminary at Andover (Boston, 1808).

48 Title page, June 1, 1809; cf. Morse, op. cit., 116.

49 Panoplist, III (New Series), 44; IV (New Series), 45.

50 Ibid., III, 330.

51 Ibid., III (New Series), 88.

52 Ibid., III, 188f.

53 Ibid., II, 237.

54 Ibid., III, 283. New auxiliaries for promotion continued to be established. In 1811, for example, the Foreign Mission Society of Boston and Vicinity was founded. “The sole object of the society shall be to raise money and pay it over to the American Board of Commissioners for Foreign Missions,” Panoplist, IV (New Series), 233.

55 American, Quarterly Register, I, 3, 42.

56 Panoplist, IV (New Series), 45.

57 Ibid., XI, 475ff.

58 Ibid., IX, 145.

59 Ibid., V, 92.

60 Ibid., XII, 133f.

61 Ibid., XI, 475.

62 Ibid., XIII, 360. Cf. American Quarterly Register, III, 108ff.

63 American Quarterly Register, IV, 92.

64 Ibid., IV, 259.

65 Ibid., IV, 249ff.

66 Ibid., I, 3, 42.

67 Detailed accounts of the full extent of this system are contained in Foster, Charles I., An Errand of Mercy (Chapel Hill, 1960)Google Scholar and Griffin, C. S., Their Brothers' Keepers (New Brunswick, 1960).Google Scholar

68 Published at New York, 1836, 111, 131–133.

69 Minutes of the General Assembly, 1816.

70 Life of Ashbel Green, VDM., ed. Joseph Jones (New York, 1849), 320.

71 Samuel Miller, Life of Samuel Miller, D.D. (2 vols.: Philadelphia, 1869), I, 35ff.

72 Letter of Miller to Benjamin Rush, June 30, 1811, Rush mss. (Library Company of Philadelphia), 27, 135.

73 A. A. Hodge, Life of Charles Hodge, D.D., LL.D. (New York, 1880).

74 Letter of Ebenezer Hazard to Morse, May 3, 1799 (Historical Society of Pennsylvania), Chief Government Officials During the Revolution, I, 22.

75 Letter of Green to Joshua M. Wallace, February 2, 1818 (HSP), Wallace Papers, VI, 187.

76 Letters as follows: Green to E. D. Griffin, November 18, 1805 (HSP), Gratz, Moderators, Presbyterian Church; Joseph Eckley to Green, August 28, 1783; Joseph Eckley to Green, August 28, 1792 (HSP), Gratz, American Churches, Case 9. Cf. William Engles, A Patriot's Plea for Domestic Missions (Philadelphia, 1833), 6f, 16.

77 Boudinot's previous activity in the moral crusade is partially recounted by Griffin, op. cit., 27ff.

78 S. J. Baird, History of the New School (Philadelphia, 1868), 286.

79 The Education Register (August, 1830). This journal was bound with the Christian Advocate.

80 American Quarterly Register, V, 342.

81 Christian Advocate (1828), 259.

82 Minutes of the General Assembly of the Presbyterian Church in the United States of America, 1828.

83 On Breckinridge's role in obtaining southern slave-holding support for the Old School, see my earlier article: “The Role of the South in the Presbyterian Schism of 1837–38,” Church History, XXIX (1960).Google Scholar

84 Cf. Haroutunian, Joseph, Piety vs. Moralism (New York, 1932)Google Scholar. Passim.

85 Relevant to the division of 1837–38 is comment by Mead; “From Coercion to Persuasion” (note 8), 331f.

86 That this was explicit policy is testified by the Christian Advocate (1834), 84.

87 Hudson argues that the original English denominational idea is ecumenical (see note 7).