2. Matthew 10:9–10, 19:24, and 19:21 respectively; quotes taken from the New Revised Standard Version. All other translations in this article are my own.

3. On Spiritual Franciscans generally, see now Burr, David, The Spiritual Franciscans: From Protest to Persecution in the Century after Saint Francis (University Park: Pennsylvania State University Press, 2001)Google Scholar. Specifically on the issue of poverty, see Burr, David, Olivi and Franciscan Poverty: The Origins of the Usus Pauper Controversy (Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 1989)CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Lambert, Malcolm, Franciscan Poverty: The Doctrine of the Absolute Poverty of Christ and the Apostles in the Franciscan Order, 1210–1323, 2nd ed. (St. Bonaventure, N.Y.: Franciscan Institute, 1998).Google Scholar

4. Little, Lester K., Religious Poverty and the Profit Economy of Medieval Europe (Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press, 1978).Google Scholar

5. Foundational here is Ladner, Gerhart, The Idea of Reform: Its Impact on Christian Thought and Action in the Age of the Fathers (Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1959)CrossRefGoogle Scholar. He extends his study up through later periods in his articles “Reformation” and “Reform: Innovation and Tradition in Medieval Christendom,” both reprinted in Ladner, , Images and Ideas in the Middle Ages: Selected Studies in History and Art, 2 vols., Storia e letteratura 155 and 156 (Rome: Edizioni de storia e letteratura, 1983), 2:519–31 and 533–58.Google Scholar

6. A good overview is provided by Strauss, Gerald, “Ideas of Reformatio and Renovatio from the Middle Ages to the Reformation,” in Handbook of European History, 1400–1600: Late Middle Ages, Renaissance, and Reformation, ed. Brady, Thomas A. Jr., Oberman, Heiko A., and Tracy, James D., 2 vols. (Leiden: Brill, 1994–1995), 2:1–30.Google Scholar

7. Again the Franciscans are the most obvious example. See above, n. 3.

8. A central argument of Little, Religious Poverty, see esp. 99–169.

9. On the beguine movement, see McDonnell, Ernest W., The Beguines and Beghards in Medieval Culture, with Special Emphasis on the Belgian Scene (New Brunswick, N.J.: Rutgers University Press, 1954)Google Scholar; more recently Simons, Walter, “The Beguine Movement in the Southern Low Countries: A Reassessment,” Bulletin de l'Institut historique belge de Rome 59 (1989): 63–105Google Scholar; Simons, , Cities of Ladies: Beguine Communities in the Medieval Low Countries, 1200–1565 (Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar. An insightful overview of the entire problem of the “lay religious” in the Middle Ages is Elm, Kaspar, “Vita regularis sine regula: Bedeutung, Rechtsstellung und Selbstverständnis des mittelalterlichen und frühneuzeitlichen Semireligiosentums,” in Häresie und vorzeitige Reformation im Spätmittelalter, ed. Šmahel, František, Schriften des Historisches Kollegs, Kolloquien 39 (Munich: Oldenbourg, 1998), 239–73Google Scholar. The foundational study of the religious impulses that drove such movements is Grundmann, Herbert, Religious Movements in the Middle Ages: The Historical Links between Heresy, the Mendicant Orders, and the Woman's Religious Movement in the Twelfth and Thirteenth Century, with the Historical Foundations of German Mysticism, trans. Rowan, Steven (Notre Dame, Ind.: University of Notre Dame Press, 1995), 139–52 and 241–45.Google Scholar

10. On the Beginenstreit and particularly on Mulberg, see most recently Heusinger, Sabine von, “Beginen am Mittel- und Oberrhein zu Beginn des 15. Jahrhunderts,” Zeitschrft für die Geschichte des Oberrheins 148 (2000): 67–96, esp. 69–87Google Scholar, and Heusinger, , Johannes Mulberg OP († 1414): Ein Leben im Spannungsfeld von Dominikanerobservanz und Beginenstreit, Quellen und Forschungen zur Geschichte des Dominikanerordens, n.s. 9 (Berlin: Akademie verlag, 2000), 47–82. She cites all important earlier literature.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

11. Nider is best known as an important authority on witchcraft. See now Tschacher, Werner, Der Formicarius des Johannes Nider 1437/38: Studien zu den Anfängen der europäischen Hexenverfolgungen im Spätmittelalter (Aachen: Shaker Verlag, 2000)Google Scholar; and Bailey, Michael D., Battling Demons: Witchcraft, Heresy, and Reform in the Late Middle Ages (University Park: Pennsylvania State University Press, 2003)Google Scholar. In addition to witchcraft, my book also discusses Nider's writings on what he termed the “lay religious”—see esp. 64–73. Also on this subject see Engen, John Van, “Friar Johannes Nyder on Laypeople Living as Religious in the World,” in Vita Religiosa im Mittelalter: Festschrift für Kaspar Elm zum 70. Geburtstag, ed. Felten, Franz J. and Jaspert, Nikolas, Berliner historischen Studien 31, Ordensstudien 13 (Berlin: Duncker & Humblot, 1999), 583–615.Google Scholar Another recent general study is Brand, Margit, Studien zu Johannes Niders deutschen Schriften, Dissertationes historiae fasc. 23 (Rome: Institutum historicum Fratrum Praedicatorum, 1998).Google Scholar

12. Of Mulberg, Nider would write, “socius itineris sepe esse merui huius sancti viri.” Nider, Johannes, Formicarius 2.1, ed. Colvener, C. (Douai, 1602), 99–100.Google Scholar

13. For an overview, see Elm, Kaspar, “Reform- und Observanzbestrebungen im spätmittelalterlichen Ordenswesen: Ein Überblick,” in Reformbemühungen und Observanzbestrebungen im spätmittelalterlichen Ordesnwesen, ed. Elm, Kaspar, Berliner historischen Studien 14, Ordensstudien 6 (Berlin: Duncker & Humblot, 1989), 3–19Google Scholar; Mertens, Dieter, “Monastische Reformbewegungen des 15. Jahrhunderts: Ideen – Siele – Resultate,” in Reform von Kirche und Reich zur Zeit der Konzilien von Konstanz (1414–1418) und Basel (1431–1449), ed. Hlavaček, Ivan and Patschovsky, Alexander (Constance: Universitätsverlag Konstanz, 1996), 157–81Google Scholar. On religious reform carried out under the auspices of late medieval church councils, see Mertens, Dieter, “Reformkonzilien und Ordensreform im 15. Jahrhundert,” in Reformbemühungen und Observanzbestrebungen, 431–57.Google Scholar

14. On Johannes Nider's adherence to this position, see Dahmus, John, “Preaching to the Laity in Fifteenth-Century Germany: Johannes Nider's ‘Harps,’” Journal of Ecclesiastical History 34 (1983): 55–68CrossRefGoogle Scholar; for Nider and the Dominican Johannes Herolt, see Dahmus, , “Late Medieval Preachers and Lay Perfection: The Case of Johannes Herolt, O.P.,” Medieval Perspectives 1 (1986): 122–34Google Scholar; most recently contrasting the views of the laity held by the Franciscan Johannes of Werden to Herolt and Nider, see Dahmus, , “Dormi secure: The Lazy Preacher's Model of Holiness for his Flock,” in Models of Holiness in Medieval Sermons, ed. Kienzle, Beverly Mayne, Textes et études du Moyen Age 5 (Louvain-la-Neuve: Fédération internationale des institutes d'études médiévales, 1996), 301–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

15. The standard study is Lerner, Robert E., The Heresy of the Free Spirit in the Later Middle Ages, rev. ed. (Notre Dame, Ind.: University of Notre Dame Press, 1991), esp. 35–60Google Scholar on beguines. Kieckhefer, Richard, Repression of Heresy in Medieval Germany (Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 1979), 19–51, deals with inquisitorial action against beguines.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

16. On the history of the Vienne decrees, and possible variations between the original conciliar and later published versions, see Tarrant, Jacqueline, “The Clementine Decrees on the Beguines: Conciliar and Papal Versions,” Archivum Historiae Pontificae 12 (1974): 300–308.Google Scholar

17. Kieckhefer, , Repression of Heresy, 19.Google Scholar

18. The text of Ad nostrum may be found in Friedberg, Emil, ed., Corpus iuris canonici, 2 vols. (1879–1881; reprint Graz: Akademische Druck- und Verlagsanstalt, 1959), 2: col. 1183–84Google Scholar; Cum de quibusdam in ibid., 2: col. 1169. Summaries of both in McDonnell, , Beguines and Beghards, 523–38Google Scholar; Lerner, , Heresy of the Free Spirit, 46–48 and 78–84Google Scholar; and Leff, Gordon, Heresy in the Later Middle Ages: The Relation of Heterodoxy to Dissent c. 1250–c. 1450, 2 vols. (Manchester, U.K.: Manchester University Press, 1967), 1:314–15.Google Scholar

19. On the persecutions in Strassburg, see Lerner, , Heresy of the Free Spirit, 85–105Google Scholar, and Patschovsky, Alexander, “Straßburger Beginenverfolgungen im 14. Jahrhundert,” Deutsches Archiv für Erforschung des Mittelalters 30 (1974): 56–198Google Scholar. On other persecutions in the Rhineland, see Neumann, Eva Gertrude, Rheinisches Beginen- und Begardenwesen: Ein Mainzer Beitrag zur religiösen Bewegung am Rhein, Mainzer Abhandlurigen zur mittleren und neueren Geschichte 4 (Meisenheim am Glan: Hain, 1960), 150–61Google Scholar. On the persecutions in Basel beginning in 1318, see Degler-Spengler, Brigitte, Die Beginen in Basel (Basel: n.p., 1970; originally published in Basler Zeitschrift für Geschichte und Altertumskunde 69 [1969]: 5–83 and [1970]: 29–118), 25–28Google Scholar, and Schmitt, Clément, “Le conflict des Franciscans avec le clergé séculaire à Bale sous l'évěque Gérard de Wippingen (1318–1324),” Archivum Franciscanum Historicum 54 (1961): 216–25.Google Scholar

20. For an overview, see Kieckhefer, , Repression of Heresy, 22–28Google Scholar. Lerner, , Heresy of the Free Spirit, 125–63Google Scholar, concentrates on charges of Free Spirit heresy against beguines in this period.

21. For an overview of the general course of this conflict, see Lawrence, C. H., The Friars: The Impact of the Early Mendicant Movement on Western Society (London: Longman, 1994), 152–65Google Scholar; Swanson, R. N., “The ‘Mendicant Problem’ in the Later Middle Ages,” in The Medieval Church: Universities, Heresy, and the Religious Life, Essays in Honour of Gordon Leff, ed. Biller, Peter and Dobson, Barrie, Studies in Church History, Subsidia 11 (Woodbridge, U.K.: Boydell, 1999), 217–38.Google Scholar

22. Grundmann, , Religious Movements, 141Google Scholar; McDonnell, , Beguines and Beghards, 456–58Google Scholar; Schmitt, Jean-Claude, Mort d'une hérésie: L'Eglise et les clercs face aux beguines et aux béghards du Rhin supérieur du XIVe et XVe siècle, Civilisations et sociétés 56 (Paris: Mouton, 1978), 56–57.Google Scholar

23. The central argument of Patschovsky, “Straßburger Beginenverfolgungen.”

24. Degler-Spengler, , Beginen in Basel, 33Google Scholar; Schmitt, , Mort d'une hérésie, 128–29Google Scholar; Degler-Spengler, Brigitte, “Die Beginenstreit in Basel, 1400–1411: Neue Forschungsergebnisse und weitere Fragen,” in Il movimento francescano della penitenza nella societá medioevale, ed. D'Alatri, Mariano (Rome: Istituto storico dei Cappuccini, 1980), 95–105, at 101Google Scholar; Neidiger, Bernhard, Mendikanten zwischen Ordensideal und städtischer Realität: Untersuchungen zum wirtschaftlichen Verhalten der Bettelorden in Basel, Berliner historischen Studien 5, Ordensstudien 3 (Berlin: Duncker & Humblot, 1981), 126–32Google Scholar; Patschovsky, Alexander, “Beginen, Begarden und Terziaren im 14. und 15. Jahrhundert: Das Beispiel des Basler Beginenstreits (1400/04–1411),” in Festschrift für Eduard Hlawitschka zum 65. Geburtstag, ed. Schnith, Karl Rudolf and Pauler, Roland, Münchner historischen Studien, Abteilung mittelalterliche Geschichte 5 (Kallmünz: Lassleben, 1993), 403–18, at 408Google Scholar; Heusinger, , Johannes Mulberg, 50–51.Google Scholar

25. Basel, Öffentliche Bibliothek der Universität, MS A IX 21, fol. 91r–v. The edition of the tract in Schmitt, Mort d'une hésérie, 205–7, is unreliable. A superior edition is now available in Heusinger, , Johannes Mulberg, 131–32.Google Scholar On dating of the work, see Patschovsky, , “Beginen, Begarden und Terziaren,” 404Google Scholar, and Heusinger, , Johannes Mulberg, 47–49.Google Scholar

26. Preserved in Mulberg's Tractatus contra beguinas et beghardos. I cite here from the recent edition in Heusinger, , Johannes Mulberg, 133–73, which is based on Basel, Öffentiliche Bibliothek der Universität, MS A IX 21, fols. 91v–109v.Google Scholar

27. Degler-Spengler, , Beginen in Basel, 33–34Google Scholar; Patschovsky, , “Beginen, Begarden und Terziaren,” 412Google Scholar; Heusinger, , Johannes Mulberg, 52–55 and 58–59.Google Scholar

28. Bishop Marquard of Constance's summons of August 1, 1405, is found in Basel, Öffentliche Bibliothek der Universität, MS E I 1k, fols. 486r–488v, while his decision of November 28, 1405 protecting the tertiaries is found in ibid., fols. 380v–389r. A brief version of Odo of Colonna's letter, dated November 10, 1405, is found in Basel, Öffentliche Bibliothek der Universität, MS E I li, fol. 29v. Full versions are in ibid., fols. 105v–108v, and Basel, MS E I 1k, fols. 480r–484r.

29. Degler-Spengler, , Beginen in Basel, 37–38Google Scholar. A detailed account of all twenty-two houses of lay religious in Basel is found in ibid., 92–108.

30. Degler-Spengler, , Beginen in Basel, 36–39.Google Scholar

31. Buchsman, , Positio (Heusinger, Johannes Mulberg, 131).Google Scholar

32. As mentioned above, female beguines rarely, if ever, seem to have actively begged. The most thorough study of beguine forms of life and activities, focusing on the region around Lake Constance just to the east of Basel, is Wilts, Andreas, Beginen im Bodenseeraum (Sigmaringen: Thorbecke, 1994).Google Scholar Attacks on “lay mendicancy” were perhaps made because active lay begging was more easily condemned than the passive reception of alms, or perhaps to link such attacks on beguines more emphatically to criticism of the mendicant orders. As will be seen below, the later Dominican author Johannes Nider, in his defense of lay poverty, was careful to separate the issue of alms from that of full mendicancy (see below, esp. n. 82).

33. “Licet de patrimomo crucifixi uiuere sit altario seruientibus debitum, nec non aliena stipe sustentari, ordinibus mendicantibus sit a iure concessum, mendicitate tamen se transigere est tam clerici quam laycis ualidis uniuersaliter illicitum,” and “de mendicitate uiuere sit aliis clericis, aliis scilicet a mendicantibus ordinibus et laycis ualidis uniuersaliter illicitum.” Mulberg, , Contra beguinas (Heusinger, Johannes Mulberg, 141, 142).Google Scholar

34. Mulberg, , Contra beguinas (Heusinger, Johannes Mulberg, 161–66).Google Scholar The decision of the Mainz council to which Mulberg refers is found in Mansi, Joannes Dominicus, ed. Sacrorum conciliorum nova et amplissima collectio, 53 vols. (1758–1798, 1901–1927; reprint Graz: Akademische Druck- und Verlagsanstalt, 1960–1961), 25: cols. 635–38.Google Scholar Editions of material related to beguines in Strassburg are found in Patschovsky, , “Straßburger Beginenverfolgungen,” 126–98.Google Scholar On the decision from Heidelberg, see Heusinger, , Johannes Mulberg, 56–58.Google Scholar

35. Lawrence, , The Friars, 222–23.Google Scholar For the reform movement in German lands, see the excellent surveys by Hillenbrand, Eugen, “Die Observantenbewegung in der deutschen Ordensprovinz der Dominikaner,” in Reformbemühungen und Observanzbestrebungen, 219–71Google Scholar; Neidiger, Bernhard, “Die Observanzbewegungen der Bettelorden im Südwestdeutschland,” Rottenburger Jahrbuch für Kirchengeschichte 11 (1992): 175–96Google Scholar; and Heusinger, , Johannes Mulberg, 11–38.Google Scholar Older but still essential is Löhr, Gabriel M., Die Teutonia im 15. Jahrhundert: Studien und Texte vornehmlich zur Geschichte ihrer Reform, Quellen und Forschungen zur Geschichte des Dominikanerordens in Deutschland 19 (Leipzig: Harrassowitz, 1924).Google Scholar An important new study on the issues of property and wealth in several religious orders is Mixson, James D., “Professed Proprietors: Religion, Property and the Origins of the Observant Movement” (Ph.D. diss., University of Notre Dame, 2002).Google Scholar

36. Hillenbrand, , “Observantenbewegung,” 226–27.Google Scholar

37. A position shared by the principal Dominican reform leader in Italy, Giovanni Dominici. On the early observant position on poverty, see Neidiger, Bernhard, “Der Armutsbegriff der Dominikanerobservanten: Zur Diskussion in den Konventen der Provinz Teutonia (1389–1513),” Zeitschrift für die Geschichte des Oberrheins 145 (1997): 117–58, at 120–23Google Scholar; Egger, Franz, Beiträge zur Geschichte des Predigerordens: Die Reform des Basler Konvents 1429 und die Stellung des Ordens am Basler Konzil 1431–1448 (Bern: Peter Lang, 1991), 82–83Google Scholar; and Heusinger, , Johannes Mulberg, 33.Google Scholar

38. Hillenbrand, , “Observantenbewegung,” 230Google Scholar; Heusinger, , Johannes Mulberg, 25–26.Google Scholar

39. Kaeppeli, Thomas, ed., Registrum litterarum fratris Raymundi de Vineis Capuani, magistri ordinis 1380–1399, Monumenta Ordinis Fratrum Praedicatorum Historica 19 (Rome: Institutum historicum Fratrum Praedicatorum, 1937), 160.Google Scholar

40. When St. Catherine's was successfully reformed thirty years later by Johannes Nider, the observants again faced resistance from the Nuremberg town council; Kern, Theodore von, “Die Reformation des Katharinenklosters zu Nürnberg im Jahre 1428,” Jahrbuch des historischen Vereins im Mittelfranken 31 (1863): 1–20, esp. 3–6.Google Scholar The following year, when Nider came to Basel and reformed the Dominican priory there, the wealthy female house of Klingental successfully resisted reform, thanks in part to the sisters' powerful relations on the Basel town council. See Hillenbrand, , “Observantenbewegung,” 236Google Scholar; Weis-Müller, Renée, Die Reform des Klosters Klingental und ihr Personenkreis, Basler Beiträge zur Geschichtswissenschaft 59 (Basel: Helbing & Lichtenhahn, 1956), 15–16.Google Scholar

41. Neidiger, , Mendikanten, 99–126Google Scholar; see also Neidiger, , “Liegenschaftsbesitz und Eigentumsrechte der Basler Bettelordenskonvente: Beobachtung zur Mendikantenarmut im 14. und 15. Jahrhundert,” in Stellung und Wirksamkeit der Bettelorden in der städtischen Gesellschaft, ed. Elm, Kaspar, Berliner historischen Studien 3, Ordensstudien 2 (Berlin: Duncker & Humblot, 1981), 103–17, esp. 115.Google Scholar

42. Neidiger, , Mendikanten, 128–30.Google Scholar

43. Mulberg, , Contra beguinas (Heusinger, Johannes Mulberg, 168–72).Google Scholar

44. Jacobus de Subiago de Mediolano, Relatio defactis in causa Iohannis Mulberg et conventus Predicatorum in Basilea contra fratrem OFM super beghinis, Basel, Öffentliche Bibliothek der Universität, MS E I li, fols. 458r–469r, at fols. 458r and 459v–460r.

45. Basel, Öffentliche Bibliothek der Universität, MS E I li, which contains a miscellany of documents relating to the campaign against the beguines, yields several documents favorable to Mulberg stating that he directed his actions only against abuses and errors, and “non contra terciam regulam” (fol. 7v), and that he did not oppose the third rule “in se, nec modus vivendi eiusdem” (fol. 8v). Mulberg himself, in an appeal of his case to Rome on August 8, 1405, maintained that he did not intend to attack the Franciscan order or even their tertiaries per se, but only “ritum tamen beghinatus, beghardorum, [et] lolhardorum ab ecclesia sancta reprobatum”: Basel, Öffentliche Bibliothek der Universität, MS E I 1k, fol. 491r.

46. Schmitt, , Mort d'une hérésie, 155–58Google Scholar; Degler-Spengler, , “Beginenstreit in Basel,” 101Google Scholar; Patschovsky, , “Beginen, Begarden und Terziaren,” 407Google Scholar; Heusigner, , Johannes Mulberg, 46.Google Scholar

47 See Heusinger, , Johannes Mulberg, 73–76Google Scholar, and Gilomen, Hans-Jörg, “Kirchliche Theorie und Wirtschftspraxis: Der Streit urn die Basler Wucherpredigt des Johannes Mulberg,” Itinera: Kirchengeschichte und allgemeine Geschichte in der Schweiz, die Aufgabe der Helvetia Sacra 4 (1986): 34–62.Google Scholar

48. Heusinger, , Johannes Mulberg, 78–79.Google Scholar

49. Löhr, , Teutonia, 1.Google Scholar

50. An overview of the Dominican reform in Italy can be found in Creytens, R. and d'Amato, A., “Les actes capitulaires de la congregation Dominicaine de Lombardie (1482–1531),” Archivum Fratrum Praedicatorum 31(1961): 213–306, here 214–29.Google Scholar On Dominici's appointment as vicar, see Creytens, Raymond, “Les vicaires généraux de la congrégation Dominicaine de Lombardie (1459–1531),” Archivum Fratrum Praedicatorum 32 (1962): 211–84, at 216.Google Scholar The office of vicar was a special position created by the master general of the order and answerable directly to him. Houses under the supervision of a vicar effectively removed from the control of the provincial. The office thus roused much opposition. In 1391 the chapter general had sought to eliminate all observant vicars, but Raymond of Capua had resisted. See Raymond of Capua, Opuscula litterae (Rome, 1895), 122Google Scholar; also Creytens, and d'Amato, , “Les actes capitulaires,” 216–17.Google Scholar Thereafter in 1397, 1405, 1410, 1421, 1426, and 1428, chapters general continued to seek to abolish the office. See Reichert, Benedictus Maria, ed., Acta capitulorum generalium Ordinis Praedicatorum ab anno 1380 usque ad annum 1498, Monumenta Ordinis Fratrum Praedicatorum Historica 8 (Rome: Institutum historicum Fratrum Praedicatorum, 1900), 100, 128, 140, 168, 198, and 207.Google Scholar

51. Egger, , Belträge zur Geschichte des Predigerordens, 83.Google Scholar

52. Hillenbrand, , “Observantenbewegung,” 232.Google Scholar

53. Mortier, Daniel Antonin, Histoire des Maîtres Généraux de l'Ordre des Frères Prêcheurs, 8 vols. (Paris: Picard, 1903–1920), 4:145.Google Scholar

54. Mortier, , Histoire des Maîtres Généraux, 4:142–43.Google Scholar

55. Löhr, , Teutonia, 4–5Google Scholar; Neidiger, , “Armutsbegriff,” 128–29.Google Scholar In fact strict communal poverty had already ceased to be an issue by 1419 with the reform of the Bern convent; see Heusinger, , Johannes Mulberg, 33.Google Scholar

56 Nider, Johannes, De reformatione status cenobiticiGoogle Scholar 2.12, Basel, Öffentliche Bibliothek der Universität, MS B III 15, fols. 186v–248v, at fol. 220v. For brief overviews of this work, see Hillenbrand, , “Observantenbewegung,” 222–24Google Scholar, or Schieler, Kaspar, Magister Johannes Nider aus dem Orden der Prediger-Brüder (Mainz: Kirchheim, 1885), 397–401.Google Scholar A more extended analysis of the treatise, and Nider's reform thought in general, may be found in Bailey, , Battling Demons, 75–89.Google Scholar

57. As noted briefly in Patschovsky, , “Beginen, Begarden und Terziaren,” 408.Google Scholar

58. The most complete overview of the council is Helmrath, Johannes, Das Baster Konzil: Forschungsstand und Probleme (Cologne: Bohlau, 1987).Google Scholar For more detail on the Dominicans in Basel, including Nider, see Egger, Beiträge zur Geschichte des Predigerordens. On Nider as a professor in vienna, see Frank, Isnard Wilhelm, Hausstudium und Universitätsstudium der Wiener Dominikaner bis 1500, Archiv für österreichische Geschichte 127 (vienna: Bohlau, 1968), 214–16Google Scholar, and Tschacher, , Der Formicarius des Johannes Nider, 71–74.Google Scholar

59. Haller, Johannes and others, eds., Concilium Basiliense: Studien und Quellen zur Geschichte des Concils von Basel, 8 vols. (1896–1936; reprint Wiesbaden: Kraus, 1971), 8:109.Google Scholar

60. Haller, , Concilium Basiliense, 1:227–28Google Scholar; Koller, Heinrich, ed., Reformation Kaiser Siegmunds, Monumenta Germaniae Historica, Staatschriften des späteren Mittelalters 6 (Stuttgart: Hiersemann, 1964), 216 and 218.Google Scholar

61. Lerner, , Heresy of the Free Spirit, 172.Google Scholar

62. On De secularium religionibus, see Engen, Van, “Friar Johannes Nyder.” On both De secularium religionibus and De paupertate perfecta seculariumGoogle Scholar, see Bailey, , Battling Demons, 64–73.Google Scholar For manuscript copies of both treatises, see Kaeppeli, Thomas, ed., Scriptores Ordinis Praedicatorum medii aevi, 4 vols. (Rome: ad Santa Sabina, 1970–1993), 2:511–12. Additional copies of De paupertate perfecta secularium are found in Munich, Bayerische Staatsbibliothek, Clm. 18195, fols. 243r–259v, and Nuremberg, Germanisches National-museum, Hs. 101 221, fol. 266v (excerpt). Additional copies of De secularium religionibus are found in Emmerich, Stadtarchiv, MS 13, fols. 20r–23v (excerpts from chapters 1 and 4), and Melk, Stiftsbibliothek, Cod. mell. 1833, fols. 161r–167r (Johannes von Speyer, Excerpta ex tractatu magistri Ioannis Nider de eremetis et anachoretis = De secularium, chapters 11 and 12). Here I have relied on the copies in Basel, Öffentliche Bibliothek der Universität, MS B III 15, fols. 1r–54r.Google Scholar

63. On dating, see Bailey, , Battling Demons, 152.Google Scholar

64. On use of treatises at Basel, see Miethke, Jürgen, “Die Konzilien als Forum der öffentlichen Meinung im 15. Jahrhundert,” Deutsches Archiv für Erforschung des Mittelalters 37 (1981): 736–73, esp. 753–55.Google Scholar In this sense, De paupertate perfecta secularium was similar to another treatise produced by Nider at approximately this same time; see Bailey, Michael D., “Abstinence and Reform at the Council of Basel: Johannes Nider's De abstinencia esus carnium,” Mediaeval Studies 59 (1997): 225–60, at 235.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

65. “pro defensione LoIhardorum, Beghardorum siue Beginarum, tam in reguli tercia sancti Francisci quam extra existencium.” Buchsmann, , PositioGoogle Scholar (Heusinger, , Johannes Mulberg, 132).Google Scholar

66. A phrase used in various documents collected in Basel, Öffentliche Bibliothek der Universität, MS E I li, fols. 19v–20r, 21v–22r, 23r–v, and 25r. The distinction is also drawn sharply throughout the treatise strongly opposing Mulberg's actions by Jacobus de Mediolano, Relatio de factis in causa Iohannis Mulberg.

67. As per the decisions by Cardinal Odo Colonna (Basel, Öffentliche Bibliothek der Univerität, MS I li, fol. 29v and 107r, or MS I 1k, fol. 482r) and Bishop Marquard of Constance (Basel, Öffentliche Bibliothek der Universität, MS E I 1k, fol. 381r).

68. In chapter 3 of De secularium religionibus (fols. 4v–5v), Nider “solvit dubium utrum fratres et sorores de tercia regula sancti Francisci condempnetur per ea que contra beguinas et beghardos fulminata sunt, et ponit opinionem quod non.” In chapter 4 (fols. 5v–7v), he then “solvit aliud dubium et ostendit quod non omnes beghardi vocati et beguine vocate comdempnantur per iura allegata in secundo et tercio capitulo, sed triplex genus talium vivit licite in seculo.”

69. Nider explicitly mentions his earlier arguments from De paupertate perfecta secularium in De secularium religionibus, fol. 2r.

70. Nider, De paupertate, fol. 23v.

71. “Repondetur quod paupertas existencium in ordine perfeccior est per se … quam cuiuscumque singularis persone extra ordinem et extra collegium existentis.” Ibid., fol. 26r.

72. Ibid., fol. 26v.

73. Ibid., fols. 27v–28r. Nider cites Aquinas, Summa contra gentiles 3.130 and 3.133. In fact, he seems to be referring to 3.132 (S. Thomae Aquinatis opera omnia, ed. Busa, Roberto, 7 vols. [Stuttgart: Frommann-Holzboog, 1980], 2:103–4).Google Scholar

74. Neumann, , Rheinisches Beginen- und Begardenwesen, 130–31.Google Scholar

75. Tremp, Kathrin Utz, “Zwischen Ketzerei und Krankenpflege – Die Beginen in der spätmittelalterlichen Stadt Bern,” in Zwischen Macht und Dienst: Beiträge zur Geschichte und Gegenwart von Frauen im kirchlichen Leben der Schweiz, ed. Bietenhard, Sophia (Bern: Stämpfli, 1991), 27–52, esp. 38–42.Google Scholar

76. Nider cites Genesis 3:19, “in sudore vultus tui vesceris pane,” as well as Job 5:7, “homo ad laborem nascitur” (De paupertate, fol. 28v). He also cites many early religious authorities on the value of labor, including Jerome, Ad rusticum monachum, Cassian, De institutis monachorum 1.4, and the Rule of Saint Benedict (ibid., fol. 29r).

77. Nider, De paupertate, fol. 29v.

78. “Sic ergo patet quod religiosi et secula[r]es qui sine furtu, sine concupiscencia alienarum rerum, et sine turpi cura vitam habere possunt, undecumque ex precepto apostoli laborare non tenentur.” Nider, De paupertate, fol. 30r. He gives no exact citation, but is probably drawing on Aquinas, Summa contra gentiles 3.135. See Aquinas, , Opera omnia, 2:105.Google Scholar

79. Nider, De paupertate, fol. 31r. He refers to Augustine, De opere monachorum, probably chapters 9–10 (Migne, J. P., ed. Patrologiae cursus completes, series Latina, 221 vols. [Paris: Migne, 1841–1864], 40: col. 555–56)Google Scholar, and to Aquinas, probably his Contra impugnantes paupertatem 2.4, “Utrum religiosus propriis manibus laborare” (Aquinas, , Opera omnia, 3:537–39).Google Scholar

80. “Utrum voluntarie pauperes devoti qui aut oraccioni aut leccioni aut psalmis aut eciam verbo dei … privatim possint excusan a labore manuum?” Nider, De paupertate, fol. 31v.

81. “mellius est dare eleemosynas sanctis pauperibus quam quibuscumquam aliis.” Nider, De paupertate, fol. 35r. He cites Aquinas' commentary on Jerome, Ad vigilancium hereticum. This is found in Aquinas, Contra impugnantes paupertatem 2.6 (Aquinas, , Opera omnia, 3:543).Google Scholar

82. “Mendicitas propter Christum assumpta non solum non est reprobanda, sed maxime laudanda.” Nider, De paupertate, fol. 42v. Again, probably referring to Aquinas, Contra impugnantes paupertatem, 2.6 (Aquinas, , Opera omnia, 3:543–45). It should be noted, as mentioned above, that female beguines, who were clearly Nider's main, although not exclusive, focus in this treatise, rarely if ever actually begged, although communities of beguines often did receive a considerable amount of alms (see above, n. 32). The careful distinction of mendicancy from mere receipt of alms seems another example of the purely theoretical nature of Nider's treatise.Google Scholar

83. Nider cites Henry, Quodlibet 13.7. See Decorte, J., ed., Henrici de Gandavo quodlibet XIII, Henrici de Gandavo opera omnia 18 (Leuven: University Press, 1985), 205–40.Google Scholar

84. “Qui voluntariam paupertatem pro Christo accipit omnibus temporalibus a se abdicatis, melius facit mendicando victum querere quam manibus laborando.” Nider, De paupertate, fol. 46v. Unfortunately, he gives no indication of which of Bernard's many works he is using.

85. “Duplex est mendicitas. Una que est effectus paupertatis necessie et coacte, alia que est effectus paupertatis voluntarie propter deum assumpte. Prima non est meritoria, et ideo perfeccius est vivere de labore manuum quam mendicare primo modo. Secunda autem est meritoria, et ideo perfeccius est vivere de mendicitate illa quam de labore.” Nider, De paupertate, fol. 46v.

86. “Dico ergo quod ut in pluribus ad maiorem perfeccionem possent pervenire voluntarie pauperes, si in parte vel in toto viverent de eleemosynis. … Et hec sit prima conclusio.” Nider, De paupertate, fol. 47r.

87. “Secunda conclusio est quod si aliquibus paucis horis possent aquirere totum victum suum honesto labore, plus valeret eis ad perfeccionem consequendam vivere de labore manuum quam totum victum habere per mendicacionem sive per eleemosynas sibi datas et nunquam operari.” Nider, De paupertate, fol. 47r.

88. “Tercia conclusio est quod si non possunt totum victum neccessarium paucis horis et honesto labore non implicando aquirere, possunt tamen aquirere partem, tunc plus valeret ad perfeccionem consequendam ut in pluribus quod partim viverent de labore manuum, partim de eleemosynis, quam quod nunquam laborarent.” Nider, De paupertate, fol. 47v.

89. Wilts, , Beginen in Bodenseeraum, 152–53, 238–39.Google Scholar