Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-n9wrp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-17T05:51:55.876Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Thomas Rogers and the English Sabbath: The Case for a Reappraisal

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 July 2009

Kenneth L. Parker
Kenneth L. Parker
Affiliation:
Bankhead Fellow in European History in the University of Alabama, University, Alabama.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

From the publication of Peter Heylyn's History of the Sabbath in 1636 to the most recent studies of this doctrine, sabbatarianism has been treated as an important and controversial issue in the post-Reformation period. These studies portray sabbatarianism as a puritan innovation, which that party introduced in an effort to reform the church from below, having failed to covert the English church to presbyterianism. This doctrinal innovation has been described by Professor Collinson as “something more than a certain ethical and social attitude to the use of Sunday: it implies the doctrinal assertion that the fourth commandment is not an obsolete ceremonial law of the Jews but a perpetual, moral law, binding on Christians; in other words, that the Christian observance of Sunday has its basis not in ecclesiastical tradition but in the decalogue.”

Type
Research Article
Information
Church History , Volume 53 , Issue 3 , September 1984 , pp. 332 - 347
Copyright
Copyright © American Society of Church History 1984

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Collinson, Patrick, “The Beginnings of English Sabbatarianism,” in Studies in Church History, eds. Dugmore, C. W. and Charles, Duggan (London, 1964) 1: 207–221 (p. 207).Google Scholar

2. Ibid.; Fuller, Thomas, The Church History of Britain, 6 vols. (Oxford, 1845), 5:219;Google ScholarCollier, Jeremy, An Ecclesiastical History of Great Britain, 9 vols. (London, 1852) 7:190;Google ScholarKnappen, M. M., Tudor Puritanism (Chicago, 1970), p. 442;Google ScholarHill, Christopher, Society and Puritanism in Pre-Revolutionary England (London, 1964), pp. 146–218;Google ScholarSolberg, Winton, Redeem the Time (London, 1977), pp. 27–80;CrossRefGoogle ScholarGreaves, Richard, “The Origins of English Sabbatarian Thought,” Sixteenth Century Journal 12 (1981): 19–34;CrossRefGoogle ScholarSprunger, Keith, “English and Dutch Sabbatarianism and the Development of Puritan Social Thought 1600–1660,” Church History 51 (1982): 24–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

3. Rogers, Thomas, The Catholic Doctrine of the Church of England ed. Perowne, J. J. S. (Cambridge, 1854), p. 17.Google Scholar

4. Ibid., pp. 17–20.

5. Ibid., p. 18; Thomas Aquinas, Summa Theologica, la2ae Q100 art 3, 2a2ae Q122 art 4; Bullinger, Heinrich, Fiftie Godlie and Learned Sermons (London, 1572), pp. 136–144;Google ScholarHooper, John, A Declaration of the Ten Holy Commaundements (London, 1548), pp. 100–118;Google ScholarBecon, Thomas, Works, ed. John, Ayre (Cambridge, 1844), pp. 80–85.Google Scholar For a full explanation of the medieval background of this doctrine, see my 1984 Cambridge Ph.D. dissertation, “The English Sabbath, 1558–1640.”Google Scholar

6. Parker, Matthew, Correspondence of Matthew Parker, ed. John, Bruce (Cambridge, 1853), p. 81.Google Scholar

7. The testimonies of Peter Heylyn and Archbishop Ussher confirm this conclusion. Heylyn, Peter, History of the Sabbath (London, 1636), p. 244;Google ScholarUssher, James, The Judgement of the Late Arch-bishop Armagh and Primate of Ireland (London, 1657), p. 106;Google ScholarCleaver, Robert, A Declaration of the Christian Sabbath, pp. 137–138.Google Scholar

8. Corrie, G. E., ed. Certain Sermons (Cambridge, 1850), p. 342.Google Scholar

9. Numbers 15:32–36.

10. Certain Sermons, pp. 343–344.

11. Haugaard, William, Elizabeth and the English Reformation (Cambridge, 1970), p. 276.Google Scholar

12. Alexander Nowell's Catechism and the marginalia of the Geneva Bible and the Bishops' Bible also support this position.

13. See note 2 above.

14. Andrewes, Lancelot, The Moral Law Expounded (London, 1642), pp. 324–362.Google Scholar

15. British Library, Harl. Ms 7038, p. 78. I am grateful to Kenneth Fincham for this reference.

16. Collinson, , ‘Beginnings,’ p. 216;Google ScholarKnappen, M. M., “The Early Puritanism of Lancelot Andrewes,” Church History, 2 (1933): 95–104;CrossRefGoogle ScholarAndrewes, Lancelot, Ninety-Six Sermons, 5 vols. (Oxford, 1841), 2:227–228, 426; 4:321;Google Scholar Chinchester Visitation Articles 1606, and amended to 1609; Ely Visitation Articles 1610 and 1613.

17. Whitgift, John, Works, ed. John, Ayre, 3 vols. (Cambridge, 1852), 2:265–567, 569, 572, 574–575, 585, 587, 591.Google Scholar

18. Ibid., 2:565, 593.

19. Strype, John, The Life and Acts of John Whitgift, 3 vols. (Oxford, 1822), 1:151–152.Google Scholar

20. Kennedy, W. P. M., Elizabethan Episcopal Administration, 3 vols. (London, 1924), 2:60.Google Scholar

21. Babington, Gervase, A Very Fruitful Exposition of the Commandments (London, 1583), pp. 169–178;Google ScholarBabington, Gervase, Workes (London, 1615), p. 10.Google Scholar

22. King, John, Lectures upon Jonas (Oxford, 1597), p. 96;Google ScholarBayly, Lewis, The Practice of Pietie, 30th ed. (London, 1632), pp. 377–482;Google Scholar Authur Lake, “Theses de Sabbato,” appended to Twisse, William, Morality of the Fourth Commandment (London, 1641)Google Scholar, sig. A3r.

23. Howson, John, A Sermon Preached at St. Maries in Oxford (Oxford, 1602)Google Scholar, sig. C1v.

24. East Sussex Record Office 467/7/9; Strype, Whitgift, 3:224–26; Overall, John, The Convocation Book of MDCVI (Oxford, 1844), pp. 87–93.Google Scholar The authorship of a Bodleian manuscript concerning the morality of the sabbath precept is ascribed to John Hayward, although a contemporary hand attributes the ideas to Bishop Overall. Bodleian Library, Rawlinson MS D. 1350, fols. 228–247.

25. Richard Hooker, Ecclesiastical Polity, Book 5, chap. 70, art. 9.

26. Barrow, Henry, The Writings of Henry Barrow, ed. Carlson, L. H. (London, 1962), pp. 384–391.Google Scholar

27. Whitgift, , Works, 2:565, 593;Google Scholar Howson, Sermon, Sigs. B3v, B4r.

28. Whitgift, , Works, 1:200, 202;Google ScholarRogers, John, The Summe of Christianitie (n.p., 1560)Google Scholar, fol. 12v; Bunny, Edmund, A Short Summe of Christian Religion (London, 1576), fols. 46–52;Google ScholarKnewstub, John, The Lectures of John Knewstub upon the Twentieth Chapter of Exodus (London, 1577), pp. 63–76;Google ScholarShutte, Christopher; A Compendius Forme and Summe of Christian Doctrine (London, 1581)Google Scholar, sig. B8v; Becon, , Works, pp. 80–85;Google ScholarBecon, Thomas, A New Postil (London, 1566), fols. 130–132;Google ScholarBateman, Stephen, The New Arrival of the Three Gracis (London, 1580)Google Scholar, sig. D6r; Bullinger, , Sermons, p. 141.Google Scholar

29. John Rylands Library, Rylands English MS 874, fols. 20r-22r.

30. Andrewes, , Sermons, 2:426;Google ScholarBayly, , Pietie, 380–81;Google Scholar Lake. “Theses” sig. A2r; Bownde, Nicholas, Sabbathum Veteris et Novi Testamenti or The True Doctrine of the Sabbath (London, 1606), Epistle, p. 84;Google ScholarPerkins, William, A Godly and Learned Exposition or Commentary upon the Three First Chapters of the Revelation (London, 1606), p. 43;Google ScholarBurton, William, An Abstract of the Doctrine of the Sabbath (London, 1606), pp. 16–17;Google ScholarWidley, George, The Doctrine of the Sabbath (London, 1604), p. 45.Google Scholar

31. For a survey of the literature, see Avis, P. D. L., ‘Moses and the Magistrate: A Study in the rise of Protestant Legalism,” Journal of Ecclesiastical History 26 (1975): 149–172.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

32. Hastings, Robinson, ed., The Zurich Letters, 2 vols. (Cambridge, 1842), 1:295–296.Google Scholar

33. Whitgift, , Works, 1:270, 201.Google Scholar

34. Roberts, Humphrey, An Earnest Complaint (London, 1572)Google Scholar, Epistle; see also Stockwood, John, A very fruitful sermon preached at Paules Crosse (London, 1579), p. 50.Google Scholar

35. Whitgift, , Works, 1:271, 273, 278.Google Scholar Also see Bishop Hutton's views on this subject, Strype, , Whitgift, 3:224–225.Google Scholar

36. “Lawes Divine, Morall and Martiall,” in Peter Force, ed., Tracts and Other Papers, 4 vols. (New York, 1947), 3:10–11.Google Scholar There is no evidence that the death penalty ever actually was used against sabbath-breakers in Virginia. Solberg, , Redeem the Time, pp. 86–89.Google Scholar

37. See list of Vistation Articles above.

38. Visitation Articles for Exeter, 1599; Rochester, 1565; St. Davids, 1583.

39. Visitation Articles for Berkshire Archdeaconry, 1595. Hostility toward this activity is usually associated with puritans, but Archbishop Laud's endorsement of this activity during the 1633 Book of Sports controversy should not obscure the fact that some Elizabethan and Jacobean bishops attempted to suppress these festivals.

40. Visitation Articles for Chester, 1617.

41. Hartley, T. E., ed., Proceedings in the Parliaments of Elizabeth I, 2 vols. (Leicester, 1981), 1:202.Google Scholar

42. Strype, John, Annals of the Reformation, 7 vols. (Oxford, 1824), 1:1:318–319.Google Scholar

43. Visitation Articles for Ely, 1579.

44. University Library, Cambridge, Ely Diocesan Records, D/2/10 and D/2/10a.

45. Stubbes, Phillip, The Anatomie of Abuses (London, 1583)Google Scholar, sig. L2v.

46. Curtis, Mark H., “Hampton Court Conference and its Aftermath,” History 46 (1961): 1–16;CrossRefGoogle ScholarShriver, Frederick, “Hampton Court Re-Visited: James I and the Puritans,” Journal of Ecclesiastical History 33 (1982):48–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

47. Cardwell, Edward, A History of Conferences (Oxford, 1840), p. 187.Google Scholar

48. Collinson, , “Beginnings,” pp. 219–221.Google Scholar

49. Rogers, , Doctrine, pp. 3–18.Google Scholar

50. Bownde, Nicholas, doctrine of the Sabbath (London, 1595)Google Scholar, sig. A4r.

51. John Rylands Library, Rylands English MS 524, fol. 48r/v.

52. Rogers, , Doctrine, p. 18.Google Scholar

53. Sarah, Williams, ed., Letters Written by John Chamberlain (London, 1861), pp. 47–48;Google Scholar see Hayward, John:n Dictionary of National Biography; Calender of State Papers Domestic, 1598–1601, pp. 165, 450–452.Google Scholar

54. A letter from Whitgift to Secretary Cecil, dated 10 May 1600, describes the suppression of a third book associated with Essex. While the author and title are unknown, Dawson, the printer named in the letter, did not print the books of either Bownde or Hayward, which confirms this as an additional case (British Library, Additional MS 4160, fol. 109).

55. British Library, Additional MS 38492, fol. 104.

56. Rogers, , Doctrine, p. 20.Google Scholar

57. Ibid., p. 20; Greenham, Richard, ‘A treatise of the Sabbath,” in Works (London, 1599), pp. 300–388;Google ScholarEstye, George, Exposition upon the tenne commaundements (London, 1602;Google ScholarDod, John and Cleaver, Robert, A treatise or exposition upon the ten commandements (London, 1603);Google Scholar Widley, Doctrine of the Sabbath; Bownde, Sabbathum Veteris; Burton, Abstract; Three posicions concerninge the aucthoritie of the Lordes daye, printed in 1606 but not extant, see Arber's, Stationers Register, vol. 3 (London, 1875 p. 146;Google ScholarSprint, John, Propositions tending to proove the necessarie use of the christian Sabbaoth or Lord's day (London, 1607).Google Scholar

58. For a detailed study of these issues, see my 1984 Cambridge Ph.D. dissertation “The English Sabbath, 1558–1604.”Google Scholar