In this journal (XII. 171, A Seventh-Century English Edition oj Virgil) I showed that an English monastery-teacher's marginal interpretations of Virgil had furnished material to the English group of Latin Glossaries—Corpus, First Amplonian (or Erfurt I.), Second Amplonian (or Erfurt II.), etc.; also that this English edition (if we may dignify it with the name ‘edition’) had no connexion with that Spanish Virgil whose ‘glossae collectae’ make Professor Goetz' so-called Virgil Glossary (C.G.L. IV. 427–470) and furnished material to the Abolita Glossary (cf. Weir, C.Q. XII. 22; Lindsay and Thomson, Ancient Lore in Medieval Latin Glossaries, pref. p. viii).