^{page 100 note 1} Strictly speaking the change from hand A to hand B takes place in the middle of f. 60v.

^{page 100 note 2} There must be some mistake in the numbers. The year of the world 6993 extended from Sept.

1st, 1484, to Aug. 31st, 1485, and corresponded with the third year of the Indiction. Accor dingly, if Aug. 21st, 1485, was meant, νδ. $$y$$ should have been written; if 1486 was the year, νδ. $$S'$$ would be right, but the year of the world should be ςλϞ (=6994).

^{page 102 note 1} The contents of the supplementary leaves are as follows:

ff. [I]-[9b] = Bk. I. 1–13 (p. 3. 1μρας… p. 17. 2 καὶ Δημαι [νέτη]).

f. [24] = I. 19 (p. 25. 29 τ ἴσον. … p. 27. 16 δελϕῷ τῷ μῷ).

ff. [90] = V. 13–15 (p. 134. 19 ταῖς το προσώ που … p. 136. 4 ἒπαιζον εἶπɛν).

ff. [97]-[II6] = V. 23-VI. 14 (p. 145. 22 κα το των οὓτω … p. 175. 17 ὑπ τν συνεϰντων).

ff. [122]-[124] = VII. 5–8 (p. 183. 2. νεβησαν … p. 187. 28 διαδρναι μν).

f. [129]= VII. 11–12 (p. 193. 30 [προα]πηγορενμνον … p. 195. 13 τοῖς ρωμνοις).

ff. [133]-[136] = VII. 15–21 (p. 199. 28 κλλος … p. 205. 29 γκρατεᾳ).

f [139] = VII. 23 (p. 208. 25 ἒϰων ὦ μτερ … p. 210. 6 μτερος ἴσθι [sic]).

^{page 102 note 2} The letter F here and for the rest of the article refers, of course, only to the original MS.

^{page 102 note 3} For an account of the two families and their members see Classical Quarterly, XIX. (1925), p. 177Google Scholar sqq., and also XX. (1926), p. 37 sqq. Since I wrote those articles much new evidence has come to light, and they need to be considerfably modified and supplemented. But the central theory as to the existence of two main groups seems to be sound, and for the purposes of the present article that is sufficient. It is important, however, to notice that the MS. referred to in both my earlier articles as the Codex Xylandri or X, which at that time I assumed to be lost, has subsequently turned out to be the extant Marcianus 409 (which I now call Z), or, if not Marcianus 409, a MS. so much like it that the point is immaterial. Further it should be observed that Z, though mixed, belongs to the β rather than to the γ tradition.

^{page 103 note 1} See the latter half of note 3, p. 3 supr.

^{page 103 note 2} E.g. I. 17 [p. 22. 17] βρτερον ZFT: βροτραν vel - ως vel -αν ὡς cett.

IX. 6 [p. 251. 24] αθιπων ZFT for αἰτων.

^{page 104 note 1} Such corrections are by no means necessarily right.

^{page 104 note 2} Perhaps because νελομνη occurs a few lines earlier (p. 175. 24).

^{page 104 note 3} E.g. I. 33 [p. 38. 14–5] and VI. 13 [p. 174. 22–3].

^{page 104 note 4} Vindobonensis 116 (A) and a group of three Paris MSS.—2904, 2906 and 2907 (Δ). A and Δ are not very closely related either to one another or to FT; but all have some things in common and all provide the same kind of variant.

^{page 104 note 5} The same correction was proposed by Canter.