Hostname: page-component-7bb8b95d7b-l4ctd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-09-10T22:17:31.580Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Horace, Epistles, 1. 16. 35ff.

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 February 2009

Jonathan Foster
Affiliation:
University of Liverpool

Extract

In this noblest of Epistles Horace has been warning Quinctius to trust his own judgement about his happiness—is he sapiens bonusque? (20). The plaudits of the people are fickle and can be withdrawn overnight. Only a man who is flawed and in need of treatment is delighted by false honour or upset by untrue defamation: the philosophic man is impervious to both. Horace, prompted by the words ‘pone, meum est’, illustrates the idea of defamation by reference to a very ancient and traditional form of Italian popular justice—flagitatio ordefamatory dunning.The three charges made in the Horatian passage—thieving, homosexuality, and unfilial behaviour—also appear in the classic Plautine catalogue of flagitatio at Pseud. 360 ff., where the pimp Ballio is abused: ‘fur’ (365), ‘impudice’ (360), ‘parricida’ (362).

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © The Classical Association 1971

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

page 214 note 1 Ep. 1. Cf. 4. 5, 7. 22.

page 214 note 2 I owe this point to Professor Niall Rudd.

page 214 note 3 Cf. Usener, H., Rh. Mus. lvi (1901), 1 ff.Google Scholar ? Kl. Schriften iv. 356 ff., who does not include the present passage in his fundamental treatment of the subject.

page 214 note 4 Cf. also 367, ‘verberavisti patrem atque matrem’, to which Ballio unashamedly replies, ‘atque occidi quoque’.

page 214 note 5 Cf. Fraenkel, E., J.R.S. li (1961), 48 ff.Google Scholar