Hostname: page-component-5c6d5d7d68-thh2z Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-08-16T20:23:48.505Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The new passage of Tiberius Claudius Donatus

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 February 2009

S. J. Harrison
Affiliation:
Corpus Christi College, Oxford
M. Winterbottom
Affiliation:
Corpus Christi College, Oxford

Extract

Peter Marshall has done what all those concerned with manuscripts dream of doing: he has turned up a substantial lost portion of an ancient text. His discovery is related, with great modesty, in an article in Manuscripta 37 (1993), 3–20, where he prints for the first time Tiberius Claudius Donatus' commentary on Virgil, Aeneid 6.1–157, edited from a gathering written in the sixteenth century and now bound into Vaticanus Latinus 8222 ff. 2r–9v. We offer here some emendations to the text he prints; we are grateful to Prof. M. D. Reeve and Dr S. J. Heyworth for their suggestions, which we have incorporated in what follows. The bold figures represent the lines of Aeneid 6.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © The Classical Association 1995

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Professor Marshall tells us that illis at 146 (sequetur [sc. ramus] Ladductus manu, et Mis probabis utrum te vocent fata) is a misprint for the illic of the MS. Prof. Reeve attractively suggests illinc.