Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-t5tsf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-18T01:12:28.856Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Plato Comicvs: Frag. Phaon II.: A Parody of Attic Ritual

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 February 2009

Lewis R. Farnell
Affiliation:
Exeter College, Oxford

Extract

There is no fragment of the older Attic Comedy that concerns Greek religion so intimately as this, and none which has been so misinterpreted. It may also claim to have a certain value for our literary judgment of Plato.

The story of Phaon is preserved for us by three authorities, Aelian, Palaiphatos, and Servius; and with few variations and additions all three present it as follows: Phaon was an elderly Lesbian ferryman who transported Aphrodite, disguised as an old woman, across the sea; and she in reward gave him a magic ointment which restored his youth and ensured him the desperate love of all women. I am not concerned here with the handling of the story in other literature, nor with its original significance. We may suspect that it originated as a ίερòς λόγος. But it is presented to us merely as a piece of folklore, as a theme well suited to the temper of the Middle Attic Comedy. We may suppose that Plato followed a version known to Kratinos, according to which Aphrodite was the chief lover of Phaon and jealous of guarding him against her rivals. For it is certain, as Meineke has pointed out, that it is Aphrodite who delivers the speech contained in this fragment; in line seven she demands a preliminary sacrifice to herself, under the name κουροτρόɸος Only a divinity can demand sacrifice, and κουροτρόο;ος is a familiar epithet of many deities including Aphrodite, and she is the only deity possible in this scene, in which she is trying to keep off the ardent crowd of women from her beloved Phaon, by insisting on long and complicated preliminary rites and sacrifices before their admission to her shrine, where she is keeping him, as she once kept Kinyras.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © The Classical Association 1920

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

page 139 note 1 Var. Hist. 12, 18.

page 139 noge 2 De Incred. 49.

page 139 note 3 Ad Verg. Aen. 3, 279.

page 139 note 4 Anthen., p. 69.

page 140 note 1 Dittenberger, , Syll. 2594, 598Google Scholar.

page 142 note 1 They are mentioned among the offerings to Despoina in the inscription found near Lykosoura (Dittenberger, Syll. 2 939).

page 142 note 2 E.g. Prott-Ziehen, 97, inscription from Amorgos, money-offering called πέλανος.

page 142 note 3 Vide Anthropological Essays presented to E. B. Tylor, p. 81.

page 142 note 4 L. 982.

page 142 note 5 P. 588.

page 143 note 1 B.C.H. 1883, p. 166.

page 143 note 2 This is notably the case in the commentary on the inscription in Prott-Ziehen, Leges Sacratae, 71. The Editors honestly try to interpret the two documents together, but go laboriously astray.

page 143 note 3 1885, p. 85; also in C.I.A. 1657, and Dittenberger Sylloge2, 631.

page 144 note 1 The quotation from his play in Plutarch Praec. reipubl. ger., p. 801 B, proves this—vide Meineke, p. 161.

page 144 note 2 ἐμɸαƖνει δἐ καƖ Πλάτων ἐν ɸαƖῷ ɸαƖδρῳ (emend ɸάωνι) ὼπτακαιδεκάτῳ έτει ύστερọν διδαχθέντι ώς ὲπὶ ɸιλọκλέọνς ώς μɳσɳι αɳτης (i.e. Λάιδọς). The ɸαῖδρoς is an unlikely title, and there is no mention of it in the list given by suidas.

page 145 note 1 Clouds, 52.