No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
Agrippa's Response to paul
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 27 October 2009
Abstract
- Type
- Original Contributions
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © The Classical Association 1908
References
page 239 note 1 Let a few suffice: Plut. Pericles 159 F , Coriol. 217 F , Mar. 427 A , Crass. 547 C, Polyb. 10. 18, Appian, Mithrid. 330, Themistius 11. 143 C, Eustath. Il. β p. 339. 18 .
page 241 note 1 Wetstenius, Kuinoel, Neander, de Wette, Lange, Robinson, Hackett, Conybeare.
page 241 note 2 Valla, Luther, Beza, Grotius, Castalio, Du Veil, Bengel, Stier.
page 241 note 3 Oecumenius, Olshausen, Baumgarten, Meyer, Lechler.
page 241 note 4 It is worthy of note that so many scholars unconsciously betray their dissatisfaction with πε⋯θεις by discarding the idea it involves, to a certain extent, and introducing another word to express the main idea (something which translates ) whenever they attempt to paraphrase the passage.
page 241 note 5 Kritisch-Exegetisches Handbuch über die Apostelgeschichte.