Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-n9wrp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-21T17:26:52.893Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A Bodleian Collation of a Tibullus MS

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 October 2009

W. M. Lindsay
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Original Contributions
Information
The Classical Review , Volume 12 , Issue 9 , December 1898 , pp. 445 - 446
Copyright
Copyright © The Classical Association 1898

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

446 1 Let me call attention to a copy of Statius' Silvae, Florence 1480 (Auct. N. inf. i. 6), with this entry at V. ii. 48 ‘ in antiquo erat venivea.’

446 2 Not however No. 112 of the ‘Poetae in Duodecimo’ in the ‘ Bibliotheca Heinsiana,’ viz. ‘Terentius, exc. Rob. Stephanus, 1540…Perpetuus Jos. Scaligeri comes, cujus multa leguntur.’ What has become of this volume?

446 3 Here are their present press-marks: Auct. S v. 10–12 (= Bibl. Heins. ‘Poetae in 12mo.’ No. 37), Auct. S v. 7–9 (= do. No. 38), Auct. S v. 5 (= No. 648 of ‘Poetae in 8vo.’), Auct. S v. 2 (=No. 637 of do.), Auct. S v. 1 (perhaps= No. 355 of do.), Auct. ii. R 6. 25 (= No. 641 of do.), Auct. ii. R 6. 23 (perhaps= No. 640 of do.). A good deal maybe learnt about the several MSS. from the descriptions jotted on fly-leaves by Heinsius. And the enquiry of a recent editor, whether Heinsius’ ‘codex Neapolitanus’ definitely ascribed the ‘de Medicamine Faciei’ to Ovid may be answered from Heinsius' entry on p. 323 of Auct. S v. 10: ‘ In cod. Neap. S. Johannis Carbonarii post Artem et Amores leguntur, Ovidivs De Philomela, De Pvlice, De Medicamine Avrivm (constat versibus 21), De Specvlo (est de medicamine faciei), DE Nvce, De cvcvlo, De Hvmoribvs, De Lvdo Schaccorvm. Omnia nugatoria.’

446 4 Auct. S v. 13–15 (= Bibl. Heins. ‘Poetae in 12 mo.’ No. 36), Auct. S v. 6 (‘Poetae in 8vo.’, No. 631), Auct. ii. R 6. 21 (= do., No. 639). But Auct. S v. 3 and 4, with collations, apparently by Nic, Faber, do not seem to have come from the ‘ Bibliotheca Heinsiana.’

446 5 So styled in the last marginal note (on Dom. Mars. 3.). Elsewhere ‘codex vetustus,’ ‘codex veterrimus,’ ‘codex vetus,’ c. antiquissimus, &c.

446 6 Ad. ii. 26. Securum… Venus] sic Aurispa Seneca aliter presidio noctis sentio adesse deam.