No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
Katharsis - Alexandre Ničev: La Catharsis Tragique dans Aristote. Nouvelles Contributions. Pp. 175. Sofia: Université de Sofia, Kliment Ohridski, 1982.
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 16 February 2009
Abstract
![Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'](https://static.cambridge.org/content/id/urn%3Acambridge.org%3Aid%3Aarticle%3AS0009840X00103555/resource/name/firstPage-S0009840X00103555a.jpg)
- Type
- Reviews
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © The Classical Association 1984
References
1 The exceptions include Lucas, D. W., CR 22 (1972), 204–205Google Scholar and Rees, B. R., CR 25 (1975), 146.Google Scholar
2 Review of L'Enigme in Izvestija AN SSSR, Serija literatury i jazyka (Moscow) 30 (1971), 6, 560–562.Google Scholar
3 Aristotel i antichnaya literatura teoriya in Aristotel i antichnaya literatura (Moscow, 1978), 13–14.Google Scholar
4 My translation.
5 Losev is able to demonstrate (p. 209) that a theory similar to N.'s was proposed over a century ago by Kock, Theodor in his Über den Aristotelischen Begriff der Katharsis in der Tragödie und die Anwendung auf König Oedipus (Elbing, 1851)Google Scholar. N.'s theory differs from Kock's mainly in the former's emphasis on doxa. At any rate, N. does not seem to have thought Kock's theory worth mentioning in La Catharsis.