No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
Note on Didache 1, 2, and Acts 15, 20. 29
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 27 October 2009
Abstract
![Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'](https://static.cambridge.org/content/id/urn%3Acambridge.org%3Aid%3Aarticle%3AS0009840X00026512/resource/name/firstPage-S0009840X00026512a.jpg)
- Type
- Review Article
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © The Classical Association 1897
References
page 148 note 1 It would make the theory of the dependence of the Διδαχ⋯ on the Western Acts far easier, and perhaps render the assumption of Blass' view unnecessary, if we thought that the absence of this passage in Barnabas pointed to its absence in the ‘Two Ways.’
page 148 note 2 The fact that the Western reading in St. Luke is probably a ‘non-interpolation’ according to W.H. has also an obvious bearing on the subject.