Hostname: page-component-5c6d5d7d68-txr5j Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-08-22T09:56:43.456Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Notes

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 October 2009

Abstract

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Notes
Copyright
Copyright © The Classical Association 1910

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Recent handbooks of mythology throw no new light on the matter (Gruppe, , Gr. Myth. u. Rel., p. 545 n. 2Google Scholar; Seeliger in Roscher's Lex. 2. 1. 64).

2 The trustworthiness of Natalis Comes is impeached by Joseph Scaliger (Epis. 309: homo futilissimus) and Huet (De Claris interpretibus 8. 5: verborum quippe et characteris securus, vix obtinet sententias). For an example of error, compare Schol. Apoll. Rh. 4. 86: with Mythol. (1581) VI. 8: Fugit autem noctu (utidictum est) cum Argo naui Iason e regione Colchorum, illud consilium suggerente Venere, veluti testatur Idmcn in his: e.q.s. ‘Idmon’ appears in the catalogue of authors cited in the Mythology.

3 Bull. d. Inst., 1838, p. 13.

4 Arch. Zeit. 12 (Denkm. u. Forsch. 6) 1854, 208.

5 Venice 1568, 1581, Frankfort 1581, Paris 1583, Frankfort 1584, [Geneva] 1596, Lyons 1602, 1605, Geneva 1605, Paris 1605, Padua 1616, Geneva 1620, Padua 1637, Geneva 1651, [Lyons] 1653. French translations: Lyons 1607, Rouen 1611, Paris 1627.