No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
Radermacher's Demetrius de Elocutione - Demetrii Phalerei qui dicitur de Elocutione libellus. Praefatus recensuit adnotavitque Ludovicus Radermacher. Lipsiae, in aedibus B. G. Teubneri. MCMI. Pp. xvi, 132. 5 m.
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 27 October 2009
Abstract
![Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'](https://static.cambridge.org/content/id/urn%3Acambridge.org%3Aid%3Aarticle%3AS0009840X00207944/resource/name/firstPage-S0009840X00207944a.jpg)
- Type
- Reviews
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © The Classical Association 1903
References
page 211 note 1 In § 156 ἔγραφεν must surely be a misprint for ἔγραΦεν.
page 213 note 1 At the very beginning of the treatise, Radermacher (like Spengel) rightly retains μιμτροις unobelized in the text. In support of the manuscript reading, he refers to W. Christ Gr. Metriks 2 p. 120, and might still more appositely hare quoted π. ρμ. §. 180 (cp. §4).
page 215 note 1 Though agreeing with Radermacher that, on the whole, the first century A.D. is a more likely date than the first century B.C., I do not regard the evidence as conclusive and should be sorry to ignore Demetrius Syrus (Cic. Brut. 315) as a possible claimant.
page 215 note 2 Finckh was, I believe, the first to direct attention to the passage of Diog. Laert. (vii. 1) here in question. May I also point out that (1) R.'s residing χλας in § 174 has been anticipated by Th. Gomperz (Philodem und die ästhetischen Schriften der herculanischen Bibliothek, p. 71); (2) misled apparently by the abbreviation ‘Schneid.’ in Walz, R. attributes (in § 2) to Schneidewin an emendation due to Schneider ?