Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-vdxz6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-27T20:41:39.121Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The Aorist in μή Clauses

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  13 February 2009

N. M. Holley
Affiliation:
Bedford College, London

Abstract

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Review Article
Copyright
Copyright © The Classical Association 1953

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 In the Hippolytus passage a perfect indicative would be normal in syntax, but too emphatic for politeness. Could the indicative have been used in the other passages? The examples quoted (e.g. Kühner-Gerth, 553 b. 6) are always of present fears about the present or past. In an admittedly not exhaustive search I have not been able to find an instance in secondary sequence and should have thought that the pluperfect at any rate would be difficult to explain.

2 Van Herwerden proposed, although without manuscript authority, to read παρεῖπεν, on the analogy of Od. v. 300 δε⋯δω μ⋯ δ⋯ π⋯,νηα θε⋯ νημρτ⋯α εἰ πεν, but there the meaning is rather, ‘The goddess was right, I am afraid.’