Hostname: page-component-84b7d79bbc-dwq4g Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-08-04T03:47:51.042Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Comoedia Togata - André Daviault: Comoedia Togata. Fragments. (Collection Budé.) Pp. 310 (96–258 mostly double pages). Paris: Les Belles Lettres, 1981.

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 February 2009

H. D. Jocelyn
H. D. Jocelyn
Affiliation:
University of Manchester
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Reviews
Information
The Classical Review , Volume 32 , Issue 2 , October 1982 , pp. 154 - 157
Copyright
Copyright © The Classical Association 1982

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 cf. Bader, B., ZPE 12 (1973), 270–276Google Scholar, Questa, C., Maia 26 (1974), 314Google Scholar. Dingel, reiterates his view at ZPE 14 (1974), 168.Google Scholar

2 See Strzelecki, Wl., Quaestiones Verrianae (Warsaw, 1932), pp. 81–92.Google Scholar

3 It would be better to make Paulus' commentary on the Historiae of L. Coelius Antipater (Charis. pp. 161. 8–12, 181. 10–12, 281. 23–6) the source of Julius Romanus' statement than to hypothesise a commentary on one of Afranius' scripts (as do Marx, F., RE I i [1893], 710Google Scholar, and Mariotti, Sc., Der kleine Pauly 1 (1964), p. 108).Google Scholar

4 Awareness of Verrius' tendency to cite units of metre rather than of sense (see J. Vahlen, Ennianae poesis reliquiae 2 (Leipzig, 1903), pp. lxv–lxxi) would have assisted with the problem of punctuating and interpreting Afran. 15 (= 17 Daviault, p. 147).

5 Daviault omits Priscian's reference to Caper from his report of the context of Afran. 16 (Gramm. Lat. II. 499. 17–500. 11).

6 The Danieline citations probably stem in the first instance from the commentary of Donatus. Servius includes none (cf. Lloyd, R. B., HSCPh 65 (1961), 302–304)Google Scholar, an interesting pointer to how the early fifth century school regarded the Togata. Schol. Ver. Virg. Buc. 7. 33 (citing Atta 10–11) comes expressly from the commentary of Aemilius Asper; perhaps also those on Aen. 2. 670 and 10. 564.

7 On the common source of the fourth century chapters de tropis see Barwick, K., Remmius Palaemon und die römische Ars grammatica (Leipzig, 1922 [Philologus, Suppl. 15. 2]), pp. 42–43.Google Scholar