No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
The Greek Evidence for the Origin of the Imperial Appeal
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 27 October 2009
Abstract
An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
![Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'](https://static.cambridge.org/content/id/urn%3Acambridge.org%3Aid%3Aarticle%3AS0009840X00187839/resource/name/firstPage-S0009840X00187839a.jpg)
- Type
- Review Article
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © The Classical Association 1894
References
page 143 note 1 Even in this case it may not be an appeal because the emperor still continued to exercise this jurisdiction personally (Vit. Hadriani 22).
page 143 note 2 Plin. (ad Trai. 81) says that he was ‘appellatum’: and yet this was admittedly a case of first instance, arising from the request of the prosecutor ‘ut cognoscerem pro tribunali.’
page 144 note 1 If we do not follow Dio's apparent statement that had ‘maius imperium’ over these (liii. 32).