No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
Haplology
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 27 February 2009
Abstract
![Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'](https://static.cambridge.org/content/id/urn%3Acambridge.org%3Aid%3Aarticle%3AS0009840X00220076/resource/name/firstPage-S0009840X00220076a.jpg)
- Type
- Review Article
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © The Classical Association 1965
References
page 140 note 1 The same applies to the assumption of achaplology at Lucilius 123 inde Diciarchitum populos. Dicarchitum is to be read; cf. Marx ad loc.
page 140 note 2 Hainsworth says that the haplology here is ‘generally accepted’. It is not accepted in the excellent (and only) modern commentary on the poem, that of C. F. Russo.
page 141 note 1 The facts are given by Chantraine, i. 84–85.