No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
Horace, Odes i. 28. 7–8
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 27 October 2009
Abstract
![Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'](https://static.cambridge.org/content/id/urn%3Acambridge.org%3Aid%3Aarticle%3AS0009840X00090600/resource/name/firstPage-S0009840X00090600a.jpg)
- Type
- Review Article
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © The Classical Association 1948
References
1 I was there, of course, arguing against Mr. Griffiths's deduction that since it must here mean ‘died’ it was ‘inexact’; but what I wrote is obviously equally applicable as against this other view, which had occurred to me as one that nobody would ever maintain.
2 Rose's remissus appears to have been intended for an incidental improvement. That word is, of course, ruled out by the following admissus, with which it would make antithesis but not point.