Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-dh8gc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-17T18:19:59.989Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Note on the Genuineness of the New Plautus Fragment

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 October 2009

E. A. Lowe
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Review Article
Information
The Classical Review , Volume 37 , Issue 1-2 , February 1923 , pp. 24
Copyright
Copyright © The Classical Association 1923

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Sitzungsber. d. preuss. Akad. d. Wiss., pp. 468–476 (and facsimile), 497–503.

2 Vol. XXXIII. (1919) 152.

3 ‘Comptes rendus de l'Académie des Inscriptions et Belles Lettres,’ pp. 223–229 (Bulletin, Mai-Juin, 1922): ‘Un prétendu fragment de Plaute en onciale du IVe siècle.’

4 Letter a with roundish bow is not unknown in very old uncial; cf. the Bodleian Chronicle of Jerome (Auct. T. 2. 26), saec. V., or the Florentine Pandects, saec. VI. Nor do the objections to the ‘boucle anterieure’ of the letter u and of the cross stroke of t seem convincing.

5 See the guides given by Chatelain in his Uncialis Scriptura and the writer's observations in A Sixth-Century Fragment of the Letters of Pliny the Younger, p. 19 sq. (Washington, 1922).