Hostname: page-component-7bb8b95d7b-l4ctd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-09-13T21:34:46.496Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

On Some Derivatives of τ λ ο ς

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 October 2009

Abstract

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Original Contributions
Copyright
Copyright © The Classical Association 1901

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 How τλος, which appears primarily to have meant ‘completion’ or ‘accomplishment,’ came to acquire the signification ‘authority,’ it is not easy to say. Perhaps I may be permitted to hazard the suggestion that the meaning ‘authority’ arose from the referring of disputes among the people to the king or head-man, in whose hands would be said to lie the ‘conclusion’ or decision of the matter. From this the extension to the wider sense ‘authority’ would be natural, if not inevitable; and to describe the king himself or his representatives as τ τλος, ‘the authorities,’ would be a further easy step to which there are many parallels. The transference would be similar to that by which we use the title ‘Great Seal’ to denote the seal's custodian. Τλος; would thus describe the king from the point of view of his judicial functions, as ρξ describes him from the side of those in which he takes the initiative, as in administration and military command. The use of the word to mean ‘tax’ may have arisen from its employment to denote the court-fee demanded for the delivery of a judicial decision; but in fact, any dues demanded by those ν τλει might naturally be so-called, without a primary reference to court-fees. The history of the Engl. word ‘fine’ (=penalty) affords a curiously close parallel.