No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
Triphiodorus and Musaeus - Bernard Gerlaud: Triphiodore, La Prise d'llion. Texte établi et traduit. (Collection des Universités de France.) Pp. 180 (75–102 double). Paris: Les Belles Lettres, 1982. 90 frs. - Henricus Livrea: Triphiodorus, Ilii Excidium. (Bibliotheca Scriptorum Graecorum et Romanorum Teubneriana.) Pp. xxvi + 50. Leipzig: Teubner, 1982. 23 M. - Henricus Livrea adiuvante Paulo Eleuteri: Musaeus, Hero et Leander. (Bibliotheca Scriptorum Graecorum et Romanorum Teubneriana.) Pp. xxv + 19. Leipzig: Teubner, 1982. Paper, 14 M.
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 16 February 2009
Abstract
- Type
- Reviews
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © The Classical Association 1983
References
1 The situation is similar in Colluthus, where we have one tenth-century manuscript (Paris. Suppl. Gr. 388) versus the same b, represented by a few more copies than in Triphiodorus. Livrea's stemma (Colluto, Il Ratto di Elena, 1968) can no doubt be refined in the light of the new stemma for Triphiodorus.
2 Despite 647 and Il. 2. 527; cf. Q.S. 1. 258. Perhaps υἱ⋯ς should be written in 647 too.
3 Similar variants at Musae. 236 and 334.
4 At Q.S. 2. 430 the paradosis has ⋯ν⋯νιπε, contra Gerlaud's note.
5 See at μαζο⋯, 40 π⋯σα, 143 τετανυσμ⋯νον, 206 ⋯⋯σσαι (Gerlaud p. 70), 213 ⋯υκρα⋯ρους, 216 ῥοιτει⋯δος, 363 νομοῖο, 421 ⋯περ⋯κεις, 579 ⋯νη⋯ι, 586 ⋯ξ⋯ρνγον, 641 ⋯σπ⋯σθαι also 557 V (Livrea xi, Gerlaud 61 n. 1), 643 MV (Livrea xi, Gerlaud 60 n. 8). Livrea contradicts himself about the reading of N at 213 (p. xv and ad loc.).
6 A corrected copy, for there is a confusing error of drawing or printing: the line connecting γ and μ should connect δ and μ. One may like to add the geographical coordinates determined in Eleuteri's book: β South Italy, γ Byzantium, ζ Venice, μ Florence, V°U Rome.
7 Connections with the β family are also apparent at 257, 267, 301, 312.
8 In the apparatus, similarly, the symbol α (archetype) is often used tendentiously.
9 My two commentaries on Hesiod are for some reason listed in the bibliography, but not the two articles in which I have published conjectures on Musaeus: Phil. 106 (1962), 315 and 110(1966), 167.
10 The asyndeton in 333 is surprising and could easily be eliminated by writing ⋯π' ⋯γρ⋯πνοισιδ'.