Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-8kt4b Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-06T23:41:29.176Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Characterization of El-Tih kaolin quality using mineralogical, geochemical and geostatistical analyses

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 July 2018

A. A. Masoud*
Affiliation:
Geology Department, Faculty of Science, Tanta University, Tanta 31527, Egypt
G. Christidis
Affiliation:
Department of Mineral Resources Engineering, Technical University of Crete, Chania 73100, Greece
K. Koike
Affiliation:
Graduate School of Engineering, Kyoto University, Kyoto 615-8540, Japan

Abstract

Detailed multi-scale characterization of the kaolin quality and the controlling depositional environment is crucial for optimal quality upgrading and for prioritizing potential exploitation areas. In the present work, the quality of El-Tih kaolin, Egypt, was investigated using the chemical/mineralogical characteristics as well as the field observations of the clay. Chemical analysis of major oxides was carried out using energy dispersive X-ray fluorescence (EDS-XRF) spectrometry. Mineralogical analyses were carried out using X-ray diffraction (XRD) and scanning electron microscopy coupled with wavelength-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (SEM-WDS). Spatial heterogeneity of the quality was evaluated applying kriging geostatistical techniques and potential zones were identified.

Results clarified an upward gradual deterioration of the quality via a decrease in the Al2O3 content and thickness of the clay layers, and an increase in the TiO2 content. According to the kriging maps, areas of high potentiality indices (PI) characterized by high Al2O3 and low SiO2 content and maximum thickness of the kaolin are located to the west and east, and decrease toward the central part of the study area. The high PI zones are dominated by pseudo-hexagonal platy kaolinite, often forming accordion- and book-like aggregates with subordinate quartz and traces of Fe and Ti oxides, yielding minimal TiO2 and Fe2O3 contents. These zones of high PI are considered optimal for exploitation. Kaolinite was formed as a result of intensive weathering of rhyolite/granite and basalt in the source area, and subsequent erosion, transportation and deposition of the weathering mantles in a flood environment with marked depositional energy variations. Results allowed comparison with worldwide kaolin occurrences, and suggested the suitability of the studied kaolins for use in paper coating and filling and in higher-grade ceramics, after removal of free Fe- and Ti-oxide impurities.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © The Mineralogical Society of Great Britain and Ireland 2013

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abdallah, A.M., Adindani, A. & Fahmy, N. (1963) Stratigraphy of lower Mesozoic rocks, western side of Gulf of Suez, Egypt. Geological Survey of Egypt Paper, 27, p. 23.Google Scholar
Abdel-Khalek, N.A. (1999) The Egyptian kaolin: an outlook in the view of the new climate of investment. Applied Clay Science, 15, 325–336.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Abdel-Khalek, N.A., Hassan, F. & Arafa, M.A. (1998) Froth flotation of ultrafine Egyptian kaolin. Fizykochemiczne Problemy Mineralurgii, 32, 265–27.Google Scholar
Alsharhan, A.S. & Salah, M.G. (1997) Lithostratigraphy, sedimentology and hydrocarbon habitat of the pre-Cenomanian Nubian Sandstone in the Gulf of Suez Oil Province, Egypt. Geo Arabia, 2, 385–400.Google Scholar
Aly, G.M. (2005) Mineralogy, Geochemistry and Economic Evaluation of some Kaolin Occurrences in Egypt. PhD Thesis, Geology Department, Faculty of Science, Tanta University, Egypt, 269 pp.Google Scholar
Brown, O.R., Yusof, M.B.B.M. & Salim, M.R.B. (2011) Compaction parameters of kaolin clay modified with palm oil fuel ash as landfill liner. First Conference on Clean Energy and Technology (CET), IEEE; Malaysia, Kuala Lumpur, 27–29 June 2011, 199–204. DOI: 10.1109/CET.2011.6041463Google Scholar
Carretero, M.I. & Pozo, M. (2009) Clay and non-clay minerals in the pharmaceutical industry. Applied Clay Science, 46, 73–80.Google Scholar
Christidis, G.E. (2011) Industrial Clays. Pp 341414 in: Advances in the Characterization of Industrial Minerals (Christidis, G.E., editor). EMU Notes in Mineralogy, 9, Mineralogical Society, London.Google Scholar
Dombrowski, T. (1993) Theories of origin for the Georgia kaolins: A review. Pp. 75–98 in: Kaolin Genesis and Utilization (Murray, H., Bundy, W.M. & Harvey, C., editors). The Clay Minerals Society, Boulder, Colorado, USA.Google Scholar
Ekosse, G. (2000) The Makoro kaolin deposit, sourtheastern Botswana: its genesis and possible industrial applications. Applied Clay Science, 16, 301–320.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
El Beialy, S.A., Head, M.J. & El Atfy, H.S. (2010) Palynology of the Mid-Cretaceous Malha and Galala Formations, Gebel El Minshera, North Sinai, Egypt. Palaios, 25, 517–526.Google Scholar
El-Shishtawy, A.M., Al-Dosuky, B.T., Salem, I.A., El Assy, I.E. & Aly, G.A. (2008) Mineralogical and geochemical characteristics of Cretaceous kaolin deposits from West Central Sinai, Egypt. Geophysical Research Abstracts, 10, EGU2008-A- 10518.Google Scholar
ESRI. (2009) ArcGIS Desktop Software. Redlands, CA: ArcGIS Desktop 9.3.Google Scholar
Gámiz, E., Melgosa, M., Sánchez-Maraňón, M., Martín-García, J.M. & Delgado, R. (2005) Relationships between chemico-mineralogical composition and color properties in selected natural and calcined Spanish kaolins. Applied Clay Science, 28, 269–282.Google Scholar
German, K., Schwarz, T. & Wipki, M. (1994) Mineral deposit formation in Phanerozoic sedimentary basins of north-east Africa: the contribution of weathering. Geologische Rundschau, 83, 787–798.Google Scholar
Gomes, C.d.S.F. & Silva, J.B.P. (2007) Minerals and clay minerals in medical geology. Applied Clay Science, 36, 4–21.Google Scholar
Goovaerts, P. (1997) Geostatistics for Natural Resource Evaluation. Oxford University Press, New York.Google Scholar
Grim, R.E. (1962) Applied Clay Mineralogy. McGraw-Hill Book Co. Inc., New York, Toronto, London, 422 pp.Google Scholar
Hurst, V.J. & Pickering, S.M. (1997) Origin and classification of coastal-plain kaolins, southeastern USA, and the role of groundwater and microbial action. Clays and Clay Minerals, 45, 274–285.Google Scholar
Hutton, T.J. (1977) Titanium and zirconium minerals. Pp. 673–688 in: Minerals in Soil Environment (Dixon, J.B. & Weed, S.B., editors). Soil Science Society of America, Madison, WI, USA.Google Scholar
ICDD–International Centre for Diffraction Data (2009) Powder Diffraction File PDF, -4+, Release 2008-2009. CD ROM. Newton Square, PA, USA.Google Scholar
Li, Y., Xia, B., Zhao, Q., Liu, F., Zhang, P., Du, Q., Wang, D., Li, D., Wang, Z. & Xia, Y. (2011). Removal of copper ions from aqueous solution by calcium alginate immobilized kaolin. Journal of Environmental Sciences, 23, 404–411.Google Scholar
Ligas, P., Uras, I., Dondi, M., & Marsigli, M. (1997) Kaolinitic materials from Romana (North-West Sardinia), Italy, and their ceramic properties. Applied Clay Science, 12, 145–163.Google Scholar
Ma, H.Z. & Wang, B. (2006) Multifunctional microsize modified kaolin and its application in wastewater treatment. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 136, 365–370.Google Scholar
Maynard, R.N., Millman, N. & Iannicelli, J. (1969) A method for removing titanium dioxide impurities from kaolin. Clays and Clay Minerals, 17, 59–62.Google Scholar
Melo, V.F., Singh, B., Schaefer, C.E.G.R., Novais, R.F. & Fontes, M.P.F. (2001) Chemical and mineralogical properties of kaolinite-rich Brazilian soils. Soil Science Society of America Journal, 65, 1324–1333.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morsy, A.M. & Shata, A.A.S (1992) Mineralogy and genesis of some kaolin deposits in west central Sinai. Proceedings of the 3rd Conference Geol. Sinai. Develop., Ismailia, Egypt, 127–140.Google Scholar
Murray, H.H. (2007) Applied Clay Mineralogy: Occurrences, Processing and Application of Kaolins, Bentonites, Palygorskite-Sepiolite, and Common Clays. Elsevier, Developments in Clay Science, 2, 180 pp.Google Scholar
Murray, H.H. & Keller, W.D. (1993) Kaolins, kaolins and kaolins. Pp. 1–24 in: Kaolin Genesis and Utilization (Murray, H.H., Bundy, W. & Harvey, C., C., editors). The Clay Minerals Society, Special Publication, 1, Boulder, Colorado, USA.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Naganathan, S., Razak, H.A. & Hamid, S.N. (2010) Effect of kaolin addition on the performance of controlled low-strength material using industrial waste incineration bottom ash. Waste Management Research, 28, 848–860.Google Scholar
Nesbitt, H.W. & Young, G.M. (1982) Early Proterozoic climate and plate motions inferred from major element chemistry of lutites. Nature, 299, 715–717.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nour, W.M.N. & Awad, H.M. (2008) Effect of MgO on phase formation and mullite morphology of different Egyptian clays. Journal of the Australian Ceramic Society, 44(2), 27–37.Google Scholar
Nyakairu, G.W.A., Koeberl, C. & Kurzweil, H. (2001) The Buwambo kaolin in central Uganda: mineralogical and chemical composition. Geochemical Journal, 35, 245–256.Google Scholar
Oladoja, N.A. & Asia, I.O. (2005) Studies on the use of fortified kaolinitic soil–clay in industrial effluent purification. Water Quality Research Journal of Canada, 40, 500–509.Google Scholar
Pinheiro, P.G., Fabris, J.D., Mussel, W.N., Murad, E., Scorzelli, R.B. & Garg, V.K. (2005) Beneficiation of a commercial kaolin from Mar de Espanha, Minas Gerais, Brazil: chemistry and mineralogy. Journal of South American Earth Sciences, 20, 267–271.Google Scholar
Psyrillos, A., Howe, J.H., Manning, D.A.C. & Burley, S.D. (1999) Geological controls on kaolin particle shape and consequences for mineral processing. Clay Minerals, 34, 193–208.Google Scholar
Quintelas, C., Rocha, Z., Silva, B., Fonseca, B., Figueiredo, H. & Tavares, T. (2009) Removal of Cd(II), Cr(VI), Fe(III) and Ni(II) from aqueous solutions by an E. coli biofilm supported on kaolin. Chemical Engineering Journal, 149, 319–324.Google Scholar
Qusa, M.E. (1986) Clays in Egypt: a Commodity Package, USAID Project 263-0105. Geological Survey & Mining Authority, Egypt.Google Scholar
Salem, M.A.A. (1990) Comparative petrological and mineralogical studies on the kaolin bearing successions in west central Sinai with emphasis on industrial applications. MSc thesis, Faculty of Science, El Mansora University, Egypt.Google Scholar
Schroeder, P.A., Pruett, R.J. & Mealear, N.D. (2004) Crystal-chemical changes in an oxidative weathering front in a Georgia kaolin deposit. Clays and Clay Minerals, 52, 211–220.Google Scholar
Siddiqui, M.A., Ahmed, Z. & Saleemi, A.A. (2005) Evaluation of Swat kaolin deposits of Pakistan for industrial uses. Applied Clay Science, 29, 57–72.Google Scholar
Siska, P., Goovaerts, P., Hung, I. & Bryant, V. (2005). Predicting ordinary kriging errors caused by surface roughness and dissectivity. Earth Surface Processes and Landforms, 30, 601–612.Google Scholar
Soman, K. (1997) Geology of Kerala. Geological Society of India, 335 pp.Google Scholar
Sousa, D.J.L., Varaja, A., Yvon, J. & Da Costa, G.M. (2007) Mineralogical, micromorphological and geochemical evolution of the kaolin facies deposit from the Capim region (northern Brazil). Clay Minerals, 42, 69–87.Google Scholar
U.S. Geological Survey, Mineral Commodity Summaries (January 2011) http://minerals.usgs.gov/minerals/pubs/commodity/clays/mcs-2011-clays.pdf. Google Scholar
Veglio, F., Passarielo, B., Toro, L. & Marabini, A.M. (1996) Development of a bleaching process for a kaolin of industrial interest by oxalic, ascorbic, and sulfuric acids: preliminary study using statistical methods of experimental design. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research, 35, 1680–1687.Google Scholar
Vimonses, V., Lei, S., Jin, B., Chow, C.W.K. & Saint, C. (2009) Adsorption of Congo Red by three Australian kaolins. Applied Clay Science, 43, 465–472.Google Scholar
Voicu, G. & Bardoux, M. (2002) Geochemical behavior under tropical weathering of the Barama–Mazaruni greenstone belt at Omai gold mine, Guiana Shield. Applied Geochemistry, 17, 321–336.Google Scholar