Hostname: page-component-7bb8b95d7b-2h6rp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-09-06T05:26:58.916Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Thermodynamic and structural aspects of the dehydration of smectites in sedimentary rocks

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 July 2018

P. L. Hall ,
D. M. Astill  and
J. D. C. McConnell
P. L. Hall
Affiliation:
Schlumberger Cambridge Research, PO Box 153, Cambridge CB3 0HG
D. M. Astill
Affiliation:
Schlumberger Cambridge Research, PO Box 153, Cambridge CB3 0HG
J. D. C. McConnell
Affiliation:
Schlumberger Cambridge Research, PO Box 153, Cambridge CB3 0HG
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The diagenetic conversion of smectite to illite in shales has been proposed as a mechanism for generating overpressure (fluid pressure above hydrostatic) in sedimentary basins. However, the mechanism and rate-controlling factors of the reaction and the magnitude of the resulting volume change are not known. In this paper the thermodynamics of the reversible hydration/dehydration of smectite are analysed in the pressure/temperature regime of sedimentary rocks. If the interlamellar water is more dense than bulk water, and the pressures on the solid and fluid phases are equal, the dehydration temperature should increase with increasing confining pressure via the Clapeyron-Clausius equation. However, either fluid pressures below the pressure on the solid matrix or high pore-fluid salinities can reduce the dehydration temperature. Experiments on Ca2+-montmorillonite compacted in the presence of distilled water in a steel autoclave fitted with a sensitive pressure transducer failed to detect any overall volume change due to dehydration up to 185°C and 1400 bar. This finding, which is consistent with recent high-pressure DTA and XRD studies on Na+-montmorillonite, suggests that reversible loss of the last two water layers does not occur in sedimentary basins except as part of the more complex diagenetic conversion of smectite to illite. Some recent evidence from high-resolution TEM and microprobe analyses regarding the mechanism of the reaction is also discussed.

Type
Research Article
Information
Clay Minerals , Volume 21 , Issue 4 , October 1986 , pp. 633 - 648
Copyright
Copyright © The Mineralogical Society of Great Britain and Ireland 1986

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Aagard, P. & Helgeson, H.C. (1983) Activity/composition relations among silicates and aqueous solutions: II. Chemical and thermodynamic consequences of ideal mixing of atoms on homological sites in montmorillonites, illites and mixed-layer clays. Clays Clay Miner. 31, 207–217.Google Scholar
Ahn, J.H. & Peacor, D.R. (1984) The smectite to illite transformation in Gulf Coast argillaceous sediments based on microstructure by TEM/AEM. 33rd Annual Clay Minerals Conf., Baton Rouge, Louisiana, Abstracts, p. 22.Google Scholar
Ahn, J.H. & Peacor, D.R. (1986) Transmission and analytical electron microscopy study of the smectite to illite transition. Clays Clay Miner. 34, 165–179.Google Scholar
Anderson, D.M. & Low, P.F. (1958) The density of water adsorbed by lithium−, sodium− and potassium-bentonite. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. Proc. 22, 99–103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bell, T.E. (1986) Microstructure in mixed-layer illite/smectite and its relationship to the reaction of smectite to illite. Clays Clay Miner. 34, 146–154.Google Scholar
Boles, J.R. & Franks, S.G. (1979) Clay diagenesis in Wilcox sandstone of south-west Texas: implications of smectite diagenesis on sandstone cementation. J. Sedim. Petrol 49, 55–70.Google Scholar
Bruce, C.H. (1984) Smectite dehydration: its relation to structural development and hydrocarbon accumulation in the Northern Gulf of Mexico basin. Am. Assoc. Petrol. Geol. Bull 678, 673–683.Google Scholar
Burnham, C.W., Holloway, I.R. & Davis, N.F. (1969) Thermodynamic properties of water to 1000°C and 10,000 bars. Geol. Soc. Am. Spec. Paper 132, 96 pp.Google Scholar
Burst, J.F. (1969) Diagenesis of Gulf Coast clayey sediments and its possible relation to petroleum migration. Am. Assoc. Petrol. Geol. Bull 53, 73–93.Google Scholar
Cheatham, J.B. (1984) Wellbore stability. J. Petrol Tech. June 1984, 889–896.Google Scholar
Chenevert, M.E. (1970) Shale control with balanced-activity oil continuous muds. J. Petrol. Tech. Oct. 1970, 1309–1316.Google Scholar
Colten, V.A. (1985) Experimental determination of smectite hydration states under simulated diagenetic conditions. Ph.D. Thesis, University of Illinois (Urbana-Champaign), 144 pp.Google Scholar
Curtis, C.D. (1985) Clay mineral precipitation and transformation during burial diagenesis. Phil. Trans. Roy. Soc. Lond. A315, 91–105.Google Scholar
Deeds, C.T. & Van Olphen, H. (1961) Density studies in clay liquid systems. I. The density of water adsorbed by expanding clays. Advan, Chem. Ser. 33, 332–339.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dunoyer De, Segonzac G. (1970) The transformation of clay minerals during diagenesis and low-grade metamorphism: a review. Sedimentology 15, 281–346.Google Scholar
Dypvik, H. (1983) Clay mineral transformation in Tertiary and Mezozoic sediments from the North Sea. Am. Assoc. Petrol. Geol. Bull. 67, 160–165.Google Scholar
Eberl, D.D. & Hower, J. (1976) Kinetics of illite formation. Geol Soc. Amer. Bull. 87, 1326–1330.Google Scholar
Eberl, D.D. & Hower, J. (1977) The hydrothermal transformation of sodium and potassium smectite into mixed-layer clay. Clays Clay Miner. 25, 215–228.Google Scholar
Eberl, D.D., Whitney, G. & Khoury, H. (1978) Hydrothermal reactivity of smectite. Am. Miner. 63, 401–409.Google Scholar
Eberl, D.D. (1980) Alkali cation selectivity and fixation by clay minerals. Clays Clay. Miner. 28, 161–172.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eslinger, E. & Sellars, B. (1981) Evidence for the formation of lllite from smectite during burial metamorphism in the Belt Supergroup, Clark Fork, Idaho. J. Sedim. Petrol. 51, 203–216.Google Scholar
Foscolos, A.E. & Kodama, H. (1974) Diagenesis of clay minerals from Lower Cretaceous shales of northeastern British Columbia. Clays Clay Miner. 22, 319–336.Google Scholar
Garrels, R.M. (1984) Montmorillonite-illite stability diagrams. Clays Clay Miner. 32, 161–166.Google Scholar
Heling, D. (1974) Diagenetic alteration of smectite in argillaceous sediments of the Rhinegraben. Sedimentology 21, 463–472.Google Scholar
Heystek, H. (1954) An occurrence of a regular mixed-layer clay mineral. Mineral Mag. 30, 400–408.Google Scholar
Hougardy, J., Serratosa, J.M., Stone, W.E.E. & Van Olphen, H. (1970) Interlayer water in vermiculite: thermodynamic properties, packing density, nuclear pulse resonance and infrared absorption. Special Disc. Faraday Soc. 1, 187–193.Google Scholar
Hower, J., Eslinger, E.V., Hower, M.E. & Perry, E.A. (1976) Mechanism of burial metamorphism of argillaceous sediments: 1. Mineralogical and chemical evidence. Geol. Soc. Am. Bull, 87, 725–737.Google Scholar
Johns, W.D. & Shimoyama, A. (1972) Clay minerals and petroleum forming reactions during burial and diagenesis. Am. Assoc. Petrol Geol. Bull. 56, 2160–2167.Google Scholar
Keren, R. & Shainberg, I. (1975) Water vapor isotherms and heat of immersion of Na/Ca-montmorillonite systems. I. Homoionic clay. Clays Clay Miner. 23, 193–200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keren, R. & Shainberg, I. (1980) Water vapor isotherms and heat of immersion of Na/Ca-montmorillonite systems. III. Thermodynamics. Clays Clay Miner. 28, 204–210.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Khitarov, N.I. & Pugin, V.A. (1966) Behavior of montmorillonites under elevated temperatures and pressures. Geochem. Int. 3, 621–626.Google Scholar
Klimentidis, R.E. & Mackinnon, I.D.R. (1986) High resolution imaging of ordered mixed-layer clays. Clays Clay Miner. 34, 155–164.Google Scholar
Koster Van, Groos A.F. & Guggenheim, S. (1984) The effect of pressure on the dehydration reaction of interlayer water in Na montmorillonite. Am. Miner. 69, 872–879.Google Scholar
Macdonald, G.J.F. (1953) Anhydrite-gypsum equilibrium relations. Am. J. Sci. 251, 884–898.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McHardy, W.J., Wilson, M.J. & Tait, J.M. (1982) Electron microscope and X-ray diffraction studies of filamentous illitic clay from sandstones of the Magnus Field. Clay Miner 17, 23–39.Google Scholar
Martin, R.T. (1962) Adsorbed water on clay: a review. Clays Clay Miner. 9, 28–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mooney, R.W., Keenan, A.G. & Wood, L.A. (1952) Adsorption of water vapor by montmorillonite. I Heat of desorption and application of BET theory. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 74, 1367–1371.Google Scholar
Muffler, L.J. & White, D.E. (1969) Active metamorphism of Upper Cenozoic sediments in the Salton Sea geothermal field and the Salton Trough, south-eastern California. Geol. Soc. Am. Bull 80, 157–182.Google Scholar
Nadeau, P.H., Tait, J.M., McHardy, W.J. & Wilson, M.J. (1984a) Interstratified XRD characteristics of physical mixtures of elementary clay particles. Clay Miner. 19, 67–76.Google Scholar
Nadeau, P.H., Wilson, M.J., McHardy, W.J. & Tait, J.M. (1984b) Interstratified clays as fundamental particles. Science 225, 923–925.Google Scholar
Nadeau, P.H., Wilson, M.J., McHardy, W.J. & Tait, J.M. (1984c) Interparticle diffraction: a new concept for interstratification of clay minerals. Clay Miner. 19, 757–770.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van Olphen, H. & Fripiat, J.J. (1979) Data Handbook for Clay Materials and other Non-metallic Minerals. Pergamon, Oxford.Google Scholar
Pearson, M.J., Watkins, D. & Small, J.S. (1982) Clay diagenesis and organic maturation in northern North Sea sediments. Proc. Int. Clay Conf. Bologna and Pavia, 665–675.Google Scholar
Perry, E.A. & Hower, J. (1970) Burial diagenesis in Gulf Coast pelitic sediments. Clays Clay Miner. 18, 165–177.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Perry, E.A. & Hower, J. (1972) Late-stage dehydration in deeply buried pelitic sediments. Am. Assoc. Petrol. Geol. Bull. 56, 2013–2021.Google Scholar
Powers, M.C. (1967) Fluid-release mechanisms in compacting marine mudrocks and their importance in oil exploration. Am. Assoc. Petrol Geol. Bull. 51, 1240–1254.Google Scholar
Primmer, T. & Shaw, H.F. (1986) Diagenesis in shales: evidence from backscatter SEM and electron microprobe analyses (Preprint of paper submitted to Proc. lnt. Clay Conf., Denver, 1985).Google Scholar
Putnis, A. & McConnell, J.D.C. (1980) Principles of Mineral Behaviour. Elsevier, 227 pp.Google Scholar
Reynolds, R.C. & Hower, J. (1970) The nature of interlayering in mixed-layer illite-montmorillonites. Clays Clay Miner. 18, 25–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rieke, H.H. & Chillingarian, G.V. (1974) Compaction of Argillaceous Sediments. Elsevier, Amsterdam, 319 pp.Google Scholar
Roberson, H.E. & Lahann, R.W. (1981) Smectite to illite conversion rates: effect of solution chemistry. Clays Clay Miner. 29, 129–135.Google Scholar
Singer, A. & Müller, G. (1983) Diagenesis in argillaceous sediments. Pp. 115–212 in: Diagenesis in Sediments and Sedimentary Rocks, (Larsen, G. and Chilingar, G. V., editors). Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp. 115–212.Google Scholar
Sŕodoń, J. (1984) X-ray powder diffraction identification of illitic minerals. Clays Clay Miner. 32, 337–349.Google Scholar
Steiger, R.P. (1982) Fundamentals and use of potassium/polymer drilling fluids to minimize drilling and completion problems associated with hydratable clays. J. Petrol. Tech. Aug. 1982, 1661–1670.Google Scholar
Steiner, A. (1967) Clay minerals in hydrothermally altered rocks at Wairakei, New Zealand. Clays Clay Miner. 16, 193–213.Google Scholar
Surdam, R.C. & Crossley, L.J. (1985) Organic-inorganic reactions during progressive burial: key to porosity and permeability enhancement and preservation. Phil. Trans. Roy. Soc, Lond. A315, 135–156.Google Scholar
Weaver, C.E. & Beck, K.C. (1971) Clay-water diagenesis during burial: how mud becomes gneiss. Geol. Soc. Amer. Spec. Paper 134, 96 pp.Google Scholar