Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-r5zm4 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-28T21:51:37.521Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Evaluation of the efficacy of halloysite nanotubes in the removal of acidic and basic dyes from aqueous solution

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 May 2019

Tholiso Ngulube*
Affiliation:
Department of Ecology and Resources Management, School of Environmental Sciences, University of Venda, Private Bag X5050, Thohoyandou, 0950, Limpopo, South Africa
Jabulani Ray Gumbo
Affiliation:
Department of Hydrology and Water Resources, School of Environmental Sciences, University of Venda, Private Bag X5050, Thohoyandou, 0950, Limpopo, South Africa
Vhahangwele Masindi
Affiliation:
Council for Scientific and Industrial Research (CSIR), Built Environment, Hydraulic Infrastructure Engineering, PO Box 395, Pretoria, 0001, South Africa Department of Environmental Sciences, School of Agriculture and Environmental Sciences, University of South Africa (UNISA), PO Box 392, Florida, 1710, South Africa
Arjun Maity
Affiliation:
Department of Applied Chemistry, University of Johannesburg, Johannesburg, South Africa DST/CSIR National Centre for Nanostructured Materials, Council for Scientific and Industrial Research (CSIR), Pretoria, South Africa

Abstract

The present work describes the removal of Direct Red 81, Methyl Orange, Methylene Blue and Crystal Violet from aqueous solution using halloysite nanotubes. The clay mineral was physicochemically characterized using various methods. The influences of pH, interaction time, initial dye concentration, adsorbent amount and temperature on adsorption were monitored and interpreted. Although previous work has shown that acidic pH conditions favour the adsorption of pollutants from aqueous systems by clay materials, in this study maximum removal was possible over a wide range of pH conditions (pH ≥2–12). Adsorption was very rapid, and equilibrium was attained within 30 min. For all four dyes studied, chemical reaction seemed significant in the rate-controlling step, and the pseudo-second-order chemical reaction kinetics provided the best correlation of the experimental data. Thermodynamically, the process was spontaneous, with Gibbs energy decreasing with increasing temperature. Halloysite would be suitable for removing dyes from aqueous solution. This was further tested by using the halloysite nanotubes for the removal of complex dyes from printing and ink industry effluents.

Type
Article
Copyright
Copyright © Mineralogical Society of Great Britain and Ireland 2019 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

Associate Editor: C.-H. Zhou

References

Adebowale, K.O., Olu-Owolabi, B.I. & Chigbundu, E.C. (2014) Removal of safranin-O from aqueous solution by adsorption onto kaolinite clay. Journal of Encapsulation and Adsorption Sciences, 4, 89104.Google Scholar
Ahmed, S., Rasul, M.G., Martens, W.N., Brown, R. & Hashib, M.A. (2010) Heterogeneous photocatalytic degradation of phenols in wastewater: a review on current status and developments. Desalination, 261, 318.Google Scholar
Anirudhan, T.S. & Ramachandran, M. (2015) Adsorptive removal of basic dyes from aqueous solutions by surfactant modified halloysite clay (organoclay): kinetic and competitive adsorption isotherm. Process Safety and Environmental Protection, 95, 215225.Google Scholar
Arshadi, M., Mousavini, F., Amiri, M.J. & Faraji, A.R. (2016) Adsorption of methyl orange and salicylic acid on a nano-transition metal composite: kinetics, thermodynamic and electrochemical studies. Journal of Colloid and Interface Science, 483, 118131.Google Scholar
Benefield, L.A. (2002) Wastewater Quality/Strength/Content. Wastewater Management Program. Washington State Department of Health, Turnwater, WA, USA.Google Scholar
Berthier, P. (1826) Analyse de l'halloysite. Annales de Chimie et de Physique, 32, 332335.Google Scholar
Boukhemkhem, A. & Rida, K. (2017) Improvement adsorption capacity of methylene blue onto modified Tamazert kaolin. Adsorption Science & Technology, 35, 752773.Google Scholar
Cadena, F., Rizvi, R. & Peters, R.W. (1990) Feasibility studies for the removal of heavy metals from solution using tailored bentonite. Presented at: Hazardous and Industrial Wastes Twenty-Second Mid-Atlantic Industrial Waste Conference. Drexel University, Philadelphia, PA, USA.Google Scholar
Cannon, J.F., Gammon, S.D. & Hunsberger, L.R. (1994) KineticsLab: the Crystal Violet/sodium hydroxide reaction. Journal of Chemical Education, 71, 238.Google Scholar
Cheah, W., Hosseini, S., Khan, M.A., Chuah, T.G. & Choong, T.S.Y. (2013) Carbon coated monolith, a mesoporous material for the removal of methyl orange from aqueous phase: adsorption and desorption studies. Chemical Engineering Journal, 215–216, 747754.Google Scholar
Ciesielczyk, F., Bartczak, P., Zdarta, J. & Jesionowski, T. (2017) Active MgO–SiO2 hybrid material for organic dye removal: a mechanism and interaction study of the adsorption of C.I. Acid Blue 29 and C.I. Basic Blue 9. Journal of Environmental Management, 204, 123135.Google Scholar
D'Souza, L., Devi, P., Divya, S.M.P. & Naik, C.G. (2008) Use of Fourier transform infrared (FTIR) spectroscopy to study cadmium-induced changes in Padina tetrastromatica (Hauck). Analytical Chemical Insights, 3, 135143.Google Scholar
Errais, E., Duplaya, J., Elhabiri, M., Khodja, M., Ocampo, R., Baltenweck-Guyot, R. & Darragi, F., (2012) Anionic RR120 dye adsorption onto raw clay: surface properties and adsorption mechanism. Colloids and Surfaces A: Physicochemical Engineering Aspects, 403, 6978.Google Scholar
Freundlich, H.Z. (1906) Over the adsorption in solution. Journal of Physical Chemistry, 57A, 385470.Google Scholar
Gamoudi, S. & Srasra, E. (2018) Removal of cationic and anionic dyes using purified and surfactant-modified Tunisian clays: kinetic, isotherm, thermodynamic and adsorption-mechanism studies. Clay Minerals, 53, 159174.Google Scholar
Gu, Z., Gao, M., Luo, Z., Lu, L., Ye, Y. & Liu, Y. (2014) Bis-pyridinium dibromides modified organobentonite for the removal of aniline from wastewater: a positive role of π–π polar interaction. Applied Surface Science, 290, 107115.Google Scholar
Hajjaji, M., Beraa, A., Coppel, Y., Laurent, R. & Caminade, A. (2018) Adsorption capacity of sodic- and dendrimers-modified stevensite. Clay Minerals, 53, 525544.Google Scholar
Hajjaji, W., Andrejkovičová, S., Pullar, R., Tobaldi, D., Lopez-Galindo, A., Jammousi, F. & Labrincha, J. (2016) Effective removal of anionic and cationic dyes by kaolinite and TiO2/kaolinite composites. Clay Minerals, 51, 1927.Google Scholar
Ho, Y.S. & McKay, G. (1998) A comparison of chemisorption kinetic models applied to pollutant removal on various sorbents. Process Safety and Environmental Protection, 76, 332340.Google Scholar
Ho, Y.S. (2006) Review of second-order models for adsorption systems. Journal of Hazardous Materials B, 136, 681689.Google Scholar
Izuagie, A.A., Gitari, W.M. & Gumbo, J.R. (2016) Synthesis and performance evaluation of Al/Fe oxide coated diatomaceous earth in groundwater defluoridation: towards fluorosis mitigation. Journal of Environmental Science and Health A, 51, 810824.Google Scholar
Jiang, L., Huang, Y. & Liu, T. (2015) Enhanced visible-light photocatalytic performance of electrospun carbon-doped TiO2/halloysite nanotube hybrid nanofibers. Journal of Colloid and Interface Science, 439, 6268.Google Scholar
Joussein, E., Petit, S., Churchman, J., Theng, B., Righi, D. & Delvaux, B. (2005) Halloysite clay minerals – a review. Clay Minerals, 40, 383426.Google Scholar
Kadirvelu, K. & Namasivayam, C. (2000) Agricultural by-product as metal adsorbent: sorption of lead (II) from aqueous solution onto coirpith carbon. Environmental Technology, 21, 10911097.Google Scholar
Kamble, R., Ghag, M., Gaikawad, S. & Panda, B.J. (2012) Halloysite nanotubes and applications: a review. Journal of Advanced Science Research, 3, 2529.Google Scholar
Kausar, A., Iqbal, M., Javeda, A., Aftab, K., Nazli, Z., Bhatti, H.N. & Nouren, S. (2018) Dyes adsorption using clay and modified clay: a review. Journal of Molecular Liquids, 256, 395407.Google Scholar
Langmuir, I. (1918) The adsorption of gases on plane surfaces of glass, mica and platinum. Journal of the American Chemical Society, 40, 13611403.Google Scholar
Liu, R., Fu, K., Zhang, B., Mei, D., Zhang, H. & Liu, J. (2012) Removal of Methyl Orange by modified halloysite nanotubes. Journal of Dispersion Science and Technology, 33, 711718.Google Scholar
Liu, R., Zhang, B., Mei, D., Zhang, H. & Liu, J. (2011) Adsorption of Methyl Violet from aqueous solution by halloysite nanotubes. Desalination, 268, 111116.Google Scholar
Luo, P., Zhao, Y.F., Zhang, B., Liu, J.D., Yang, Y. & Liu, J.F. (2010) Study on the adsorption of Neutral Red from aqueous solution onto halloysite nanotubes. Water Research, 44, 14891497.Google Scholar
Mekatel, E., Amokrane, S., Aid, A., Nibou, D. & Trari, M. (2015) Adsorption of methyl orange on nanoparticles of a synthetic zeolite NaA/CuO. Comptes Rendus Chimie, 18, 336344.Google Scholar
Mu, B. & Wang, A. (2016) Adsorption of dyes onto palygorskite and its composites: a review. Journal of Environmental Chemical Engineering, 4, 12741294.Google Scholar
Ngulube, T., Gumbo, J.R., Masindi, V. & Maity, A. (2017) An update on synthetic dyes adsorption onto clay-based minerals: a state-of-art review. Journal of Environmental Management, 191, 3557.Google Scholar
Ngulube, T., Gumbo, J.R., Masindi, V. & Maity, A. (2018) Calcined magnesite as an adsorbent for cationic and anionic dyes: characterization, adsorption parameters, isotherms and kinetics study. Heliyon, 4, e00838.Google Scholar
Ofomaja, A.E. (2010) Intraparticle diffusion process for lead (II) biosorption onto mansonia wood sawdust. Bioresource Technology, 101, 58685876.Google Scholar
Ogunmodede, O.T., Ojo, A.A., Adewole, E. & Adebayo, O.L. (2015) Adsorptive removal of anionic dye from aqueous solutions by mixture of kaolin and bentonite clay: characteristics, isotherm, kinetic and thermodynamic studies. Iranian Journal of Energy and Environment, 6, 147153.Google Scholar
Park, Y., Ayoko, G.A. & Frost, R.L. (2011) Characterisation of organoclays and adsorption of p-nitrophenol: environmental application. Journal of Colloid Interface Science, 360, 440456.Google Scholar
Peng, Q., Liu, M., Zheng, J. & Zhou, C. (2015) Adsorption of dyes in aqueous solutions by chitosan–halloysite nanotubes composite hydrogel beads. Microporous and Mesoporous Materials, 201, 190201.Google Scholar
Pennell, K.D. (2016) Specific surface area. Pp. 18 in: Reference Module in Earth Systems and Environmental Sciences Publisher (Scott, A.E., editor). Elsevier, New York, NY, USA.Google Scholar
Prokop, A., Maziarz, P. & Matusik, J. (2015) Removal of selected anions by raw halloysite and smectite clay. Geology, Geophysics and Environment, 41, 125126.Google Scholar
Sari, A. & Tuzen, M. (2014) Cd (II) adsorption from aqueous solution by raw and modified kaolinite. Applied Clay Science, 88–89, 6372.Google Scholar
Sarma, G.K., Gupta, S.S. & Bhattacharyya, K.G. (2016) Adsorption of Crystal Violet on raw and acid-treated montmorillonite, K10, in aqueous suspension. Journal of Environmental Management, 171, 110.Google Scholar
Sarma, G.K., Gupta, S.S. & Bhattacharyya, K.G. (2011) Methylene Blue adsorption on natural and modified clays. Separation Science and Technology, 46, 16021614.Google Scholar
Santamarina, J.C., Klein, K.A., Wang, Y. & Prencke, E. (2002) Specific surface: determination and relevance. Canadian Geotechnical Journal, 39, 233241.Google Scholar
Santos, S.C.R., Oliveira, A.F.M. & Boaventura, R.A.R. (2016) Bentonitic clay as adsorbent for the decolourisation of dyehouse effluents. Journal of Cleaner Production, 126, 667676.Google Scholar
Słomkiewicz, P.M., Szczepanik, B. & Garnuszek, M. (2015) Determination of adsorption isotherms of aniline and 4-chloroaniline on halloysite adsorbent by inverse liquid chromatography. Applied Clay Science, 114, 221228.Google Scholar
Subbaiah, M.V. & Kim, D.S. (2016) Adsorption of Methyl Orange from aqueous solution by aminated pumpkin seed powder: kinetics, isotherms, and thermodynamic studies. Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety, 128, 109117.Google Scholar
Tomar, V., Prasad, S. & Kumar, D. (2014) Adsorptive removal of fluoride from aqueous media using citrus limonum (lemon) leaf. Microchemal Journal, 112, 97103.Google Scholar
Xiang, W., Zhang, G.K., Zhang, Y.L., Tang, D.D. & Wang, J.T. (2014) Synthesis and characterization of cotton-like Ca–Al–La composite as an adsorbent for fluoride removal. Chemical Engineering Journal, 250, 423430.Google Scholar
Xie, Y., Qian, D., Wu, D. & Ma, X. (2011) Magnetic halloysite nanotubes/iron oxide composites for the adsorption of dyes. Chemical Engineering Journal, 168, 959963.Google Scholar
Yagub, M.T., Sen, T.K., Afroze, S. & Ang, H.M. (2014) Dye and its removal from aqueous solution by adsorption: a review. Advanced Colloid Interface Science, 209, 172184.Google Scholar
Yang, R., Li, D., Li, A. & Yang, H. (2018) Adsorption properties and mechanisms of palygorskite for removal of various ionic dyes from water. Applied Clay Science, 151, 2028.Google Scholar
Yao, Y., Bing, H., Feifei, X. & Xiaofeng, C. (2011) Equilibrium and kinetic studies of Methyl Orange adsorption on multiwalled carbon nanotubes. Chemical Engineering Journal, 170, 8289.Google Scholar
Zhang, Y., Fua, L. & Yang, H. (2012) Insights into the physicochemical aspects from natural halloysite to silica nanotubes. Colloids and Surfaces A: Physicochemical Engineering Aspects, 414, 115119.Google Scholar
Zhao, Y., Abdullayev, E., Vasiliv, A. & Lvov, Y. (2013) Halloysite nanotubule clay for efficient water purification. Journal of Colloid and Interface Science, 406, 121129.Google Scholar
Zulfikar, M.A. (2013) Materials, effect of temperature on adsorption of humic acid from peat water onto pyrophyllite. International Journal of Chemical Environmental and Biological Sciences, 1, 8891.Google Scholar
Supplementary material: File

Ngulube et al. supplementary material

Ngulube et al. supplementary material 1

Download Ngulube et al. supplementary material(File)
File 798.2 KB