Hostname: page-component-5c6d5d7d68-wbk2r Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-08-16T20:23:58.869Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Layer charges of vermiculites in two forest Inceptisols in northern Taiwan

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 July 2018

C. W. Pai
Affiliation:
The Experimental Forest, National Taiwan University, Taipei, 106
M. K. Wang*
Affiliation:
Department of Agricultural Chemistry, National Taiwan University, Taipei, 106, Taiwan
H. B. King
Affiliation:
Taiwan Forestry Research Institute, Council of Agriculture, Executive Yuan, Taipei, 106
J.-L. Hwong
Affiliation:
Taiwan Forestry Research Institute, Council of Agriculture, Executive Yuan, Taipei, 106
*

Abstract

Inceptisols are the major forest soils in northern Taiwan. Some chemical, physical and morphological properties have been documented for these soils, yet there is little information on the mineralogy and the charge characteristics of their constituent 2:1 clay minerals. In this study we conducted a detailed characterization of the clay mineralogy of two Inceptisols. Two pedons were sampled at diagnostic horizons and the clay mineralogy was examined by X-ray diffraction. The magnitude of the layer charge of the 2:1 phyllosilicates was estimated using the alkylammonium exchange method (nC = 12). The clay mineralogy of both soils was dominated by vermiculite and mica with small amounts of kaolinite. The surface horizon contained more mica and kaolinite than the lower horizons. The mean layer charge of vermiculite ranged between 0.60 and 0.86 cmolc/(O10(OH)2). The distribution of clay layer charge decreased with increasing soil depth in two pedons. Differences in layer charge between samples are due to differences in weathering processes. The difference in the extent of clay mineral weathering in the A and Bsm horizons could be partly because the mineral surfaces in the Bsm horizon were coated with organo-Fe complexes which protected them from weathering.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © The Mineralogical Society of Great Britain and Ireland 2006

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bailey, S.W (1980) Summary of recommendation of AIPEA nomenclature committee. Clays and Clay Minerals, 28, 73—78.Google Scholar
Baker, W.E (1973) The role of humic acids from Tasmanian podzolic soils in mineral degradation and metal mobilization. Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta, 37, 269—281.Google Scholar
Barnhisel, R.I & Bertsch, P.M (1989) Chlorite and hydroxy-interlayered vermiculite and smectite. Pp. 729—788.in: Minerals in Soil Environments, 2nd edition (Dixon, J.B. and Weed, S.B., editors). SSSA Book Series, no 1, Soil Science Society of America, Madison, Wisconsin, USA.Google Scholar
Chiang, H.C, Chen, Z.S, Lin, K.C & Horng, F.W (1994) Soil Morphology, Properties and Classification of Alpine Forest Soils in Taiwan. Taiwan Forestry Research Institute, Taipei, Taiwan, 391 pp.Google Scholar
Chiang, H.C, Wang, M.K, Houng, K.H, White, N. & Dixon, J.B (1999) Mineralogy of B horizons in alpine forest soils of Taiwan. Soil Science, 164, 111—122.Google Scholar
Dawson, H.J, Ugolini, F.C, Hrutfiord, B.F & Zachara, J. (1978) Role of soluble organics in the soil processes of a podzol, central Cascades, Washington. Soil Science, 126, 290—296.Google Scholar
Eberl, D.D (1980) Alkali cation selectivity and fixation by clay minerals. Clays and Clay Minerals, 28, 161—172.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Egli, M., Mirabella, A., Mancabelli, A. & Sartori, G. (2004) Weathering of soils in alpine areas as influenced by climate and parent material. Clay Minerals, 52, 287—233.Google Scholar
Gee, G.W & Bauder, J.W (1986) Particle size analysis. Pp. 383—411 in: Methods of Soil Analysis. Part 1,2nd edition (Klute, A., editor). Agronomy Monograph, 9, ASA and SSSA, Madison, Wisconsin, USA. Google Scholar
Ghabru, S.K, Mermut, A.R & St. Arnaud, R.J (1989) Layer-charge and cation-exchange characteristics of vermiculite (weathered biotite) isolated from a Gray Luvisol in Northeastern Saskatchewan. Clays and Clay Minerals, 37, 164—172.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ho, C.S (1988) An Introduction to the Geology of Taiwan, Explanatory Text of the Geologic Map of Taiwan, 2nd edition. Ministry of Economic Affairs, Taipei, Taiwan.Google Scholar
Hongve, D., P.A.W., Van Hees & Lundstrôm, U.S (2000) Dissolved components in precipitation water percolated through forest litter. European Journal of Soil Science, 51, 667—677.Google Scholar
Jackson, M.L (1979) Soil Chemical Analysis — Advanced Course, 2nd edition. University of Wisconsin, Madison, Wisconsin, USA.Google Scholar
Kodama, H. & Brydon, J.E (1968) A study of clay minerals in podzolic soils in New Brunswick, Eastern Canada. Clay Minerals, 7, 295—309.Google Scholar
Lagaly, G. (1981) Characterization of clays by organic compounds. Clay Minerals, 16, 121.Google Scholar
Lagaly, G. (1982) Layer charge heterogeneity in vermiculite. Clays and Clay Minerals, 30, 215—222.Google Scholar
Lagaly, G. & Weiss, A. (1969) Determination of the layer charge in mica-type layer silicates. Pp. 61—80.in: Proceedings of the International Clay Conference. (Heller, L., editor). Israel University Press, Jerusalem.Google Scholar
Laird, D.A, Scott, A.D & Fenton, T.E (1988) Layer charge of smectites in an ArgialboU-Argiaqoll sequence. Soil Science Society of America Journal, 52, 463—467.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Loveland, P.J & Digby, P. (1984) The extraction of Fe and Al by 0.1 M pyrophosphate solution: a comparison of some techniques. Journal of Soil Science, 35, 243—250.Google Scholar
McKeague, J.A, Brydon, J.E & Miles, N.M (1971) Differentiation of form of extractable iron and aluminum in soils. Soil Science Society of America Journal, 35, 33—38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McLean, E.O (1982) Soil pH and lime requirement. Pp. 199—224.in: Methods of Soil Analysis. Part 1, 2nd edition (Klute, A., editor). Agronomy Monograph, 9. American Soil Association and the Soil Science Society of America, Madison, Wisconsin, USA.Google Scholar
Mehra, O.P & Jackson, M.L (1960) Iron oxide removal from soils and clays by a dithionite-citrate system buffered with sodium bicarbonate. Clays and Clay Minerals, 7, 317—327.Google Scholar
Mirabella, A. & Egli, M. (2003) Structural transformations of clay minerals in soils of a climosequence in an Italian alpine environment. Clays and Clay Minerals, 51, 264—278.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nelson, D.W & Sommera, L.E (1982) Total carbon, organic, and organic matter. Pp. 539—577.in: Methods of Soil Analysis Part 1, 2nd edition (Klute, A., editor). Agronomy Monograph, 9. American Soil Association and the Soil Science Society of America, Madison, Wisconsin, USA.Google Scholar
Pai, C.W (2003) Chemical and physical properties, Clay mineralogy and 14C dating of eight forest soils in Taiwan. PhD dissertation, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan.Google Scholar
Pai, C.W, Wang, M.K, Wang, W.M & Houng, K.H (1999) Smectite in iron-rich calcareous soil and black soils of Taiwan. Clays and Clay Minerals, 47, 389—398.Google Scholar
Pai, C.W, Wang, M.K & Chen, C.P (2002) Evaluation of the dodecylammonium methods in determining layer charge of 2:1 phyllosilicates. Soils and Environments, 5, 143—152.Google Scholar
Pai, C.W, Wang, M.K, Chiang, H.C, King, H.B, Hwong, J.L & Hu, H.T (2003) Characterization of iron nodules in an Ultisol of central Taiwan. Australian Journal of Soil Research, 41, 37—46.Google Scholar
Righi, D., Petit, S. & Bouchet, A. (1993) Characterization of hydroxyl-interlayered vermiculite and illite/smectite interstratified minerals from the weathering of chlorite in a Cryorthod. Clays and Clay Minerals, 41, 285—495.Google Scholar
Rhoades, J.D (1982) Cation exchange capacity. Pp. 149—157.in: Methods of Soil Analysis - Part 2, 2nd edition (Page, A.L. et al., editors). Agronomy Monograph, 9. American Soil Association and the Soil Science Society of America, Madison, Wisconsin, USA.Google Scholar
Righi, D., Huber, K. & Keller, C. (1999) Clay formation and podzol development from postglacial moraines in Switzerland. Clays and Clay Minerals, 34, 319—332.Google Scholar
Robert, M., Razzaghe-Karimi, M.H, Vicente, M.A & Veneau, G. (1979) Rôle du facteur biochimique dans l'altération des minéraux silicates. Science du Sol, 3, 153—174.Google Scholar
G., Rûhlicke & Kohler, E.E (1981) A simplified procedure for determining layer charge by the nalkylammonium method. Clay Minerals, 16, 305—307.Google Scholar
Schnitzer, M. & Kodama, H. (1976) The dissolution of mica by fulvic acid. Geoderma, 15, 381—391.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Senkayi, I., Dixon, J.B Hossner, L.R & Kippenberger, L.A (1985) Layer charge evaluation of expandable soil clays by an alkylammonium method. Soil Science Society of America Journal, 49, 1054—1061.Google Scholar
Soil Survey Staff (1993) Soil Survey Manual. USDA Agricultural Handbook 18, Washington, D.C. Soil Survey Staff (1998) Key to Soil Taxonomy, 7th edition. USDA-NRCS, Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
Tessier, D. & Pedro, G. (1987) Mineralogical characterization of 2:1 clays in soils. Pp. 78—84.in: Importance of Clay Texture (Schultz, L.G. et al., editors). The Clay Minerals Society, Bloomington, Indiana, USA.Google Scholar
Wang, M.K, Chang CM., Cheng, Y.W, Houng, K.H & Chiang, H.C (1999) Comparison of synthetic and soil Al-substituted lepidocrocite. Soil Science, 164, 311—321.Google Scholar
Wilson, M.J (1999) The origin and formation of clay minerals in soils: past, present and future perspectives. Clay Minerals, 34, 7—25.Google Scholar