Hostname: page-component-7bb8b95d7b-nptnm Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-09-30T02:05:35.230Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Clay Minerals in Some Illinois Soils Developed from Loess and Till Under Grass Vegetation

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2024

A. H. Beavers
Affiliation:
University of Illinois, USA
W. D. Johns
Affiliation:
University of Illinois, USA
R. E. Grim
Affiliation:
University of Illinois, USA
R. T. Odell
Affiliation:
University of Illinois, USA
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Clay mineral analyses were made of three groups of soil profiles — one developed from Peorian loess overlying Illinoian till — one associated with glacial till of Wisconsin age — one developed on deep to thin loess overlying Wisconsin till. These groups were investigated to determine the influence of parent material and intensity of weathering upon the soil profile development and clay mineral composition.

Montmorillonite, illite, and chlorite are the dominant clay minerals in all the samples studied. In known loess samples, montmorillonite is invariably the most abundant clay mineral component. In the samples of unweathered till of Wisconsin age, illite and chlorite are the abundant clay minerals.

Type
Article
Copyright
Copyright © The Clay Minerals Society 1954

References

Allen, V. T. (1930) Minerals formed in the weathered zones of glacial deposits: Am. Soil Surv. Assn. Bull. 11, p. 116.Google Scholar
Bray, R. H. (1934) A chemical study of soil development in Peorian loess region of Illinois: Am. Soil Surv. Assn. Bull. 15, pp. 5865.Google Scholar
Bray, R. H. (1935) The origin of horizons in claypan soils: Am. Soil Surv. Assn. Bull. 16, pp. 7075.Google Scholar
Bray, R. H. (1936) The significance of the weathering loss of K and Mg in soil colloids extracted from Illinois soils: Soil Sci, Soc. Am. Proc., vol. 1, pp. 153159.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johns, W. D., Grim, R. E., and Bradley, W. F. (1954) Quantitative estimation of clay minerals by diffraction methods: Jour. Sedimentary Petrology, vol. 24, No. 4, pp. 242251.Google Scholar
Smith, Guy D. (1942) Illinois loess— Variations in its properties and distribution: III. Agr. Exp. Sta. Bull. 490, pp. 139184.Google Scholar
Swineford, Ada, and Frye, J. C. (1951) Petrography of the Peoria loess in Kansas: Jour. Geology, vol. 59, pp. 306322.10.1086/625870CrossRefGoogle Scholar