Hostname: page-component-84b7d79bbc-g78kv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-08-01T19:15:22.465Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Glauconitic Mica in the Morrison Formation in Colorado

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2024

W. D. Keller*
Affiliation:
U. S. Geological, Survey and University of Missouri, Columbia, Missouri, USA

Abstract

Glauconitic mica occurs as interstitial clay in a bed of fine-grained sandstone, 15 feet thick, in the upper part of the Brushy Basin shale member of the Morrison formation of Late Jurassic age on Blue and Lone Tree Mesas near Uravan, Montrose County, Colorado. This glauconitic mica, similar to other material ordinarily called glauconite, is interesting because the Morrison formation is generally regarded as nonmarine in origin, whereas glauconite commonly forms in a marine environment.

The identifying properties of the glauconitic mica are: strong 001 d spacing, 9.97A; very weak 002, 5.01A; strong 003, 3.34A; 060, 1.51A; green color, pleochroic; X and Z indices, approximately 1.578 and 1.600; SiO2 49 percent, Al2O3 18 percent, Fe2O3 13 percent, FeO 1.3 percent, MgO 2.8 percent, K2O 7.8 percent, TiO2 1.1 percent, ignition loss 6 percent, others approximately 1 percent.

The glauconitic sandstone is underlain by variegated mudstones about 480 feet thick, which contain montmorillonite (with very sparse relicts of shards), illite, quartz, and also, in several layers, scanty analcime. The Burro Canyon formation of Early Cretaceous age overlies the glauconitic sandstone.

This paper discusses alternative origins of the glauconitic mica possible within the framework of an appropriate chemical environment other than, and apart from, one typically marine.

Type
Article
Copyright
Copyright © Clay Minerals Society 1956

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

Publication authorized by the Director, U. S. Geological Survey. This report concerns work done on behalf of the Division of Raw Materials of the U. S. Atomic Energy Commission. This paper was also presented at the Twentieth International Geological Congress in Mexico City, September, 1956.

References

Literature Cited

Cloud, P. E. Jr., 1955, Physical limits of glauconite formation: Am. Assoc. Petroleum Geologists Bull., v. 39, p. 484493.Google Scholar
Craig, L. C., Holmes, C. N., Cadigan, R. A., Freeman, V. L., Mullens, T. E., and Weir, G. W., 1955, Stratigraphy of the Morrison and related formations, Colorado Plateau region, a preliminary report: U. S. Geol. Survey Bull. 1009-E, p. 125165.Google Scholar
Foster, M. D., 1956, Correlation of dioctahedral potassium micas on the basis of their charge relations: U. S. Geol. Survey Bull. 1036-D, p. 5767.Google Scholar
Hendricks, S. B., and Ross, C. S., 1941, Chemical composition and genesis of glauconite and celadonite: Am. Mineralogist, v. 26, p. 683708.Google Scholar
Keller, W. D., 1953, Illite and montmorillonite in green sedimentary rocks: Jour. Sedimentary Petrology, v. 23, p. 39.Google Scholar
Krumbein, W. C., and Garrels, R. M., 1952, Origin and classification of chemical sediments in terms of pH and oxidation-reduction potentials: Jour. Geology, v. 60, p. 133.Google Scholar
McKay, E. J., 1955, Geologic map of the Red Canyon quadrangle, Colorado: U. S. Geol. Survey Geologic Quadrangle Map, GQ 58.Google Scholar
Waters, A. C., and Granger, H. C., 1953, Volcanic debris in uraniferous sandstones, and its possible bearing on the origin and precipitation of uranium: U. S. Geol. Survey Circ. 224, 26 p.Google Scholar
Weeks, A. D., 1953, Mineralogic study of some Jurassic and Cretaceous claystones and silt- stones from western Colorado and eastern Utah: U. S. Geol. Survey (Atomic Energy Comm.), TEI-285, 22 p.Google Scholar