Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-cnmwb Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-22T22:32:23.166Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Relation of Diagenetic Alteration and Soil-Forming Processes to the Uranium Deposits of the Southeast Texas Coastal Plain

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2024

Alice D. Weeks  and
D. Hoye Eargle
Alice D. Weeks
Affiliation:
U.S. Geological Survey, Washington, D.C., and Austin, Texas, USA
D. Hoye Eargle
Affiliation:
U.S. Geological Survey, Washington, D.C., and Austin, Texas, USA
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The Upper Eocene Jackson Group is the chief host rock of the uranium deposits in the Karnes area of the southeast Texas Coastal Plain. It is highly tuffaceous and the uranium deposits are within approximately 100 ft of the unconformity with the overlying Catahoula Tuff (Miocene?). Glass shards, fragments of sanidine and plagioclase, grains of finegrained volcanic rocks, and biotite and other minerals in these sediments were highly reactive chemically, causing complex diagenetic alteration and the development of alkaline carbonate pore water. Extensive caliche development and silica induration associated with a recent hotter, drier climate favored the concentration of uranium. The origin of these shallow uranium deposits is believed to have been controlled by the complex diagenesis of the highly reactive volcanic detritus, by development of a “builtin” solvent for uranium (the alkaline carbonate pore water), and by climatic, structural, and permeability conditions that allowed concentration and deposition of uranium rather than dilution and dispersal. The tuffaceous rocks are considered to have been the source of the uranium and associated molybdenum, phosphorus, and arsenic.

Type
Symposium on Bentonites and Texas Uranium Deposits
Information
Clays and Clay Minerals (National Conference on Clays and Clay Minerals) , Volume 10 , February 1961 , pp. 23 - 41
Copyright
Copyright © Clay Minerals Society 1961

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Anders, R. B. (1057) Ground-water geology of Wilson County, Texas: Texas Board of Water Engineers, Bull. 5710, 62 pp.Google Scholar
Anders, R. B. (1960) Ground-water geology of Karnes County, Texas: Texas Board of Water Engineers, Bull. 6007, 107 pp.Google Scholar
Anders, R. B. and Baker, E. T. Jr. (1961) Ground-water geology of Live Oak County, Texas: Texas Board of Water Engineers, Bull. 6105, 119 pp.Google Scholar
Bullwinkel, E. P. (1954) The chemistry of uranium in carbonate solutions: U.S. Atomic Energy Comm., RMO-2614, 66 pp.Google Scholar
Dapples, E. C. (1959) The behavior of silica in diagenesis: in Silica in Sediments, a Symposium with Discussions, Soc. Econ. Paleontologists and Mineralogists Spec. Pub. 7, pp. 36–54.Google Scholar
Denson, N. M. and Gill, J. R. (1955) Uranium-bearing lignite and its relation to volcanic tuffs in eastern Montana and North and South Dakota: in Contributions to the Geology of Uranium and Thorium for the United Nations International Conference on Peaceful Uses of Atomic Energy, Geneva, Switzerland, 1955, pp. 413–418. U.S. Geol. Survey Prof. Paper 300.Google Scholar
Bargle, D. H. (1959) Sedimentation and structure, Jackson group, south-central Texas: Gulf Coast Assoc. Geol. Socs. Trans., v. 9, pp. 31–39.Google Scholar
Eargle, D. H. and Weeks, A. D. (1961a) Uranium-bearing clays and tuffs of south-central Texas, in Field Excursion Central Texas, 10th National Clay Conference, Oct. 14-15, 1961, Texas Bur. Econ. Geol., Guidebook no. 3, pp. 19–44.Google Scholar
Eargle, D. H. and Weeks, A. D. (1961b) Possible relation between hydrogen sulfide-bearing hydrocarbons in fault-line oil fields and uranium deposits in the southeast Texas Coastal Plain: in Short Papers in the Geological Sciences: U.S. Geol. Survey Prof. Paper 424-D, art. 295, pp. D-7-9.Google Scholar
Garrels, B. M. (1957) Geochemistry of sandstone-type uranium deposits: in Dunning, J. B. and Prentice, B. R., eds., Advances in Nuclear Engineering, v. 2, Nuclear Engineering and Sci. Cong., 2nd, Philadelphia 1957, Proc., Pergamon Press, New York, pp. 288–293.Google Scholar
Garrels, R. M. (1960) Mineral Equilibria: Harper, New York, 254 pp.Google Scholar
Garrels, R. M., Hostetier, P. B., Christ, C. L. and Weeks, A. D. (1957) Stability of uranium, vanadium, copper, and molybdenum minerals in natural waters at low temperatures and pressures (abs.): Geol. Soc. America Bull., v. 68, p. 1732.Google Scholar
Green, Jack (1959) Geochemical table of the elements for 1959: Geol. Soc. America Bull., v. 70, pp. 1127–1184.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hem, J. D. (1959) Study and interpretation of the chemical characteristics of natural water: U.S. Geol. Survey Water-Supply Paper 1473, 269 pp.Google Scholar
Love, J. D. (1952) Preliminary report on uranium deposits in the Pumpkin Buttes area, Powder River basin, Wyoming: U.S. Geol. Survey Circ. 176, 37 pp.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MacKallor, J. A. and Bunker, C. M. (1958) Ore controls in the Karnes County uranium area, Texas (abs.): Geol. Soc. America Bull., v. 69, p. 1607.Google Scholar
Moxham, R. M. and Eargle, D. H. (1961) Airborne radioactivity and geologic map of the Coastal Plain area of southeast Texas: U.S. Geol. Survey Geophys. Inv. Map GP-198.Google Scholar
Pettijohn, F. J. (1957) Sedimentary Bocks, 2nd ed.: Harper, New York, 718 pp.Google Scholar
Rosholt, J. N. Jr. (1959) Natural radioactive disequilibrium of the uranium series: U.S. Geol. Survey Bull. 1084-A, pp. 1–30.Google Scholar
Waters, A. C. and Granger, H. C. (1953) Volcanic debris in uraniferous sandstone and its possible bearing on the origin and precipitation of uranium: U.S. Geol. Survey Circ. 224, 26 pp.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weeks, A. D. and Eargle, D. H. (1960) Uranium at Palangana salt dome, Duval County, Texas: in Short Papers in the Geological Sciences, U.S. Geol. Survey Prof. Paper 400-B, art. 24, pp. B-48-B-52.Google Scholar
Weeks, A. D., Truesdell, A. H. and Hafity, Joseph (1957) Nature of the ore boundary and its relation to diagenesis and mineralization, Uravan district, Colorado (abs.): Geol. Soc. America Bull., v. 68, pp. 1810–1811.Google Scholar
Weeks, A. W. (1945) Balcones, Luling, and Mexia fault zones in Texas: Amer. Assoc. Petroleum Geologists Bull., v. 29, pp. 1733–1737.Google Scholar
Wilcox, R. E. (1959) Some effects of recent volcanic ash falls with especial reference to Alaska: U.S. Geol. Survey Bull. 1028-N, pp. 409–476.Google Scholar